Return to Article Details Pointwise coproximinality in Lp(μ,X)

Pointwise Coproximinality in Lp(μ,X)

Eyad Abu-Sirhan

May 2, 2023; accepted: June 18, 2023; published online: July 5, 2023.

Let X be a Banach space, G be a closed subspace of X, (Ω,Σ,μ) be a σ-finite measure space, L(μ,X) be the space of all strongly measurable functions from Ω to X, and Lp(μ,X) be the space of all Bochner p-integrable functions from Ω to X. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relationship between the pointwise coproximinality of L(μ,G) in L(μ,X) and the pointwise coproximinality of Lp(μ,G) in Lp(μ,X).

MSC. 41A50, 41A52, 41A655.

Keywords. Best coapproximation; coproximinal; Banach space.

Department of Mathematics, Tafila Technical University, Jordan, e-mail: abu-sirhan2@ttu.edu.jo, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-5554

1 Introduction

In this article, (X,) will be referred to as a Banach space over the field R of real numbers, G as a closed subspace of X, and (Ω,Σ,μ) as a σ-finite nontrivial measure space, i.e. Ω is a countable union of measurable sets each with finite measure and there exists at least AΣ with >μ(A)>0. For p1, we suppose Lp(μ,X) is the space of all Bochner p-integrable functions from Ω to X, L(μ,X) is the linear space of all μ-equivalence classes of strongly measurable functions from Ω to X, see [ 10 ] . If a subset M of L(μ,X) is closed with regard to the pointwise limits of sequences, we say that it is closed. For EΩ and a function f:ΩX, χE is the characteristic function of the set E and χEf is the function χEf(s)=χE(s)f(s). A function f:ΩX is said to be simple if

f=i=1nxiχEi,

where xiX and Ei=f1(xi) is measurable for i=1,2,,n. A function f:ΩX is said to be strongly measurable if there exists a sequence of simple functions {fn} with

limnfn(s)f(s)=0,a.e.

Let M be a closed subspace of L(μ,X), we write Lp(M) for the Banach space of all functions in M such that Ωf(s)p is finite. An element g0G is said to be a best coapproximation of xX if

gg0xggG.

The set of all elements of best coapproximation of x in G will be denoted by RG(x). If RG(x) is nonempty for any xX, G is said to be a coproximinal subspace of X. This new kind of approximation has been introduced by C. Franchetti and M. Furri (1972) [ 4 ] to characterize real Hilbert spaces among real reflexive Banach spaces.

P.L. Papini and I. Singer (1979) [ 8 ] then went into greater depth on the best coapproximation. It has lately been studied in Lp(μ,X); for example, see [ 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 5 ] . With finite measure spaces, though, [ 5 , 6 , 7 ] have dealt. This paper’s goal is to demonstrate the connection between the pointwise coproximinality of Lp(μ,G) in Lp(μ,X) and the pointwise coproximinality of L(μ,G) in L(μ,X). Pointwise coproximinality is a counterpart of pointwise proximinality, it should be noted, see [ 9 , 2 ] .

2 Pointwise Coproximinality

Definition 1

Let M be a subset of L(μ,X) and fL(μ,X). An element ϕ0 in M is said to be a best pointwise coapproximation of f from M if for any ϕM,

ϕ0(s)ϕ(s)f(s)ϕ(s)a.e.

M is said to be pointwise coproximinal in L(Ω,X) if each element of L(Ω,X) has a best pointwise coapproximation from M.

Lemma 1

Let M be a subset of L(μ,X), fM, and AΣ. If M is pointwise coproximinal in L(μ,X), then χAfM.

Proof â–¼
Assume that M is pointwise coproximinal and there exist AΣ, fM, such that χAfM. By assumption there exists ϕA in M such that
ϕA(s)ϕ(s)χAf(s)ϕ(s)a.e.

and for all ϕM. Taking ϕ=0 one obtains

ϕA(s)χAf(s)=χA(s)f(s)a.e.

For ϕ=f one obtains

ϕA(s)f(s)χAf(s)f(s)=χAc(s)f(s)a.e.

By 1, ϕA(s)=0a.e.sAc and by 2 ϕA(s)=f(s)a.e.sA, that is, χAf=ϕAM. The proof is completed by the contradiction.

Proof â–¼

Corollary 1

Let M be a closed subspace of L(μ,X). If M is pointwise coproximinal in L(μ,X), then M is an L(μ,R)-submodule of L(μ,X).

Proof â–¼
The proof follows from lemma 1 and the fact that the set of all simple functions in L(μ,X) is dense in L(μ,X).

Let A={An:nN} be a family of countable subset of Ω. if AnΣ for any nN, AiAj=ϕ for ij, and μ(ΩnNAn)=0, then the set A is said to be measurable partition of Ω [ 3 ] .

Proof â–¼

Lemma 2 [ 2 ]

Let G be a closed subspace of X, 1p, fLp(μ,X), and hL(μ,X). If h is pointwise coapproximation to f, then hLp(μ,G) and it is a best coapproximation to f from Lp(μ,G).

Lemma 3

Let M be a closed subspace of L(μ,X) and fM. Then there exists a measurable partition {Dn,nN} such that

f(s)=nNχDnf(s)

and χDnfLp(M), 1p, for all n in N .

Proof â–¼
Since (Ω,Σ,μ) is σ-finite, we may assume that Ω=nNAn, An is measurable, AnAn+1, and μ(An)< for any nN. For each nN, let
Bn={sΩ:f(s)n},

Cn=AnBn, and Dn=CnCn1. Then {Dn,nN} is a measurable partition, χDnfLp(M) by lemma 1, and f=n=1χDnf.

Proof â–¼

Theorem 1

Let G be a closed subspace of X. Then the following are equivalent

(1) L(μ,G) is pointwise coproximinal in L(μ,X).

(2) Lp(μ,G) is pointwise coproximinal in Lp(μ,X).

Proof â–¼
(1)(2). LetfLp(μ,X). Then fL(μ,X) and it has a best pointwise coapproximation f0 from L(μ,G). By lemma 2, f0 is a best pointwise coapproximation to f from Lp(μ,G).

(2)(1). Let fL(μ,X). By lemma 3, there exists {Dn:nN} measurable partition of Ω such that

f=nNχDnf

and χDnfLp(μ,X) for any n in N and 1p. By assumption, there exists ϕnLp(μ,G) such that

ϕn(s)ϕ(s)χDnf(s)ϕ(s)a.e.
3

for all ϕL(μ,G). Taking ϕ=0 yields,

ϕn(s)χDnf(s)a.e.

and hence ϕn=χDnϕn. If we let \Barϕ=nNϕn, then \BarϕL(μ,G). We claim that

\Barϕ(s)ϕ(s)f(s)ϕ(s)a.e.

for all ϕL(μ,G). If the claim is incorrect, then ϕ0L(μ,G) exists such that

μ{s:\Barϕ(s)ϕ0(s)>f(s)ϕ0(s)}>0

and let A0={s:\Barϕ(s)ϕ0(s)>f(s)ϕ0(s)}. By lemma 3, there exists a measurable partition {Cn:nN} of Ω such that

ϕ0=nNχCnϕ0

and χCnϕ0Lp(μ,G) for any n in N and 1p. Then {CnDm:n,mN} is a measurable partition of Ω. Hence there exist n0,m0N such that μ(A0Cm0Dn0)>0. If sA0Cm0Dn0, then

\Barϕ(s)ϕ0(s)>f(s)ϕ0(s),χDn0ϕn(s)χCm0ϕ0(s)>χDn0f(s)χCm0ϕ0(s).

Let

B0={s:χDn0ϕn(s)χCm0ϕ0(s)>χDn0f(s)χCm0ϕ0(s)}.

Then A0Cm0Dn0B0 and μ(B0)>0, which contradicts 1.

Proof â–¼

Theorem 2 [ 2 ]

If Lp(μ,G) is pointwise coproximinal in Lp(μ,X), then G is coproximinal in X.

Corollary 2

If L(μ,G) is coproximinal in L(μ,X), then G is coproximinal in X.

Proof â–¼
It is obvious that pointwise coproximinality of L(μ,G) in L(μ,x) follows from coproximinality of L(μ,G) in L(μ,x). Then Lp(μ,G) is pointwise coproximinal in Lp(μ,X) by theorem 1. Therefore Lp(μ,G) is coproximinal in Lp(μ,X) and the result follows from theorem 2.
Proof â–¼

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the referee who provided useful and detailed comments on a earlier version of the manuscript.

Bibliography

1

E. Abu-Sirhan, A remark on best coapproximation in L(μ,X), Intern. J. Math. Anal., 13 (2019), pp. 449–458, https://doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2019.9847.

2

E. Abu-Sirhan, Pointwise best coapproximation in the space of Bochner integrable functions, J. Numer. Anal. Approx. Theory, 49 (2020), pp. 95–99, https://doi.org/10.33993/jnaat492-1206.

3

J. Diestel and J. Uhl, Vector Measures, vol. 15 of Mathematical Surveys, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, (1977), https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/015.

4

C. Franchetti and M. Furi, Some characteristic properties of real Hilbert spaces, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 17 (1972), pp. 1045–1048.

5

M. Haddadi, N. Hejazjpoor, and H. Mazaheri, Some results about best coapproximation in Lp(μ,X), Anal. Theory Appl., 26 (2010), pp. 69–75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10496-010-0069-0.

6

J. Jawdat, Best coapproximation in L(μ,X), J. Appl. Engrg. Math., 8 (2018), pp. 448–454.

7

H. Mazaheri and S. J. Jesmani, Some results on best coapproximation in L1(μ,X), Mediterr. J. Math., 4 (2007), pp. 497–503, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-007-0131-0.

8

P. L. Papini and I. Singer, Best coapproximation in normed linear spaces, Monatshefte für Mathematik, 88 (1979), pp. 27–44.

9

G. Tie-Xin and Y. Zhao-Yong, Pointwise best approximation in the space of strongly measurable functions with applications to best approximation in Lp(μ,X), J. Approx. Theory, 78 (1994), pp. 314–320, https://doi.org/10.1006/jath.1994.1081.

10

G. Tie-Xin and Y. Zhao-Yong, A note on pointwise best approximation, J. Approx. Theory, 93 (1998), pp. 344–347, https://doi.org/10.1006/jath.1997.3173.