Return to Article Details Characterization of mixed modulus of smoothness in weighted Lp spaces

Characterization of mixed modulus of smoothness in weighted Lp spaces,a

Ramazan Akgün1,2,3

August 22nd, 2016.

1This work has been supported by Balikesir University Scientific Research Project 2016/58.

2 Results of this work were presented in the International Conference on Analysis and Its Applications (ICAA-2016), which held in 12-15 of July at the Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir, Turkey.

3Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Balikesir, Cagis Yerleskesi, 10145, Balikesir, Turkey, e-mail: rakgun@balikesir.edu.tr.

The paper is concerned with estimates for the mixed modulus of smoothness in Lebesgue spaces with Muckenhoupt weights, Steklov type averages.

MSC. 42A10, 41A17.

Keywords. Modulus of smoothness, Lebesgue spaces, Muckenhoupt weights, partial de la Vallée Poussin means, Fourier series.

1 Introduction

The main aim of this research is to investigate the approximation properties of some means of two dimensional Fourier series in Lebesgue spaces Lωp(T2) with weights ω in the Muckenhoupt’s class Ap(T2,J), where J is the set of rectangles in T2:=T×T, T:=[0,2π] with sides parallel to coordinate axes. Trigonometric approximation by "angle" and mixed K-functional will be the main tools. We obtain the main properties of the weighted mixed modulus of smoothness Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ω in Lωp(T2), ωAp(T2,J), 1<p<. Note that, in general, in weighted spaces, such as Lωp(T2), the classical translation operators are not bounded. Instead of classical translation operators we use Steklov type operators to define the weighted mixed modulus of smoothness Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ω in Lωp(T2) (see [ 2 ] ). Starting from 70s, in the classical nonweighted Lebesgue spaces Lp(T2) (defined on T2 or Td, d1), some problems related to the classical nonweighted mixed modulus of smoothness ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p have been actively studied by mathematicians: M. K. Potapov [ 14 , 17 ] , [ 18 ] , [ 15 , 16 ] ; Potapov, Simonov, Lakovich [ 20 ] ; Potapov, Simonov, Tikhonov [ 22 ] , [ 19 , 21 ] ; A. F. Timan [ 27 ] ; M. F. Timan [ 28 , Chapter 2 ] . Among these problems we mention direct and inverse theorems of angular approximation [ 14 , 17 ] , [ 18 ] ; Hardy-Littlewood, Marcinkiewicz-Littlewood-Paley and embedding results [ 15 , 16 ] ; transformed Fourier series; embedding results of the Besov-Nikolski and Weyl-Nikolskii classes [ 19 , 21 ] , Ulyanov type inequalities [ 23 ] ; mixed K-functionals [ 6 ] , [ 25 ] ; fractional order classical mixed modulus of smoothness [ 24 ] .

In what follows, AB will mean that, there exists a positive constant Cu,v,, depending only on the parameters u,v, and can be different in different places, such that the inequality ACB holds. If AB and BA we will write AB.

It is well known that the main property of modulus of smoothness
Ωr(,δ1,δ2)p,w is that it decreases to zero as max{δ1,δ2}0. This rate can be characterized by some class Φa1,a2 defined below: the class Φa1,a2 (a1,a2R×R) consists of functions ψ(,) satisfying conditions

  • ψ(t1,t2)0 bounded on (0,)×(0,),

  • ψ(t1,t2)0 as max{t1,t2}0,

  • ψ(t1,t2) is non-decreasing in t1 and t2, (d) tiaiψ(ti) is non-increasing in ti (i=1,2).

We suppose that J is the set of rectangles in T2 with the sides parallel to coordinate axes. A function ω:T2R:=[0,) is called a weight on T2 if ω(x1,x2) is measurable and positive almost everywhere on T2. We denote by Ap(T2,J), (1<p<) the collection of locally integrable weights ω:T2R such that ω(x1,x2) is 2π-periodic with respect to each variable x,y and

C:=supGJ(1|G|Gω(x1,x2)dx1dx2)(1|G|G[ω(x1,x2)]11pdx1dx2)p1<.
1

The least constant C in (1) will be called the Muckenhoupt’s constant of ω and denoted by [ω]Ap.

The main result of this work is the characterization of the modulus of smoothness, given in the following theorem.

Theorem 1

Let rN, p(1,) and wAp(T2,J).

  • If fLωp(T2), then there exists ψΦ2r,2r such that

    Ωr(f,t1,t2)p,wψ(t1,t2)
    2

    holds for all t1,t2(0,)×(0,) with equivalence constants depending only on r and [w]Ap.

  • If ψΦ2r,2r then there exist f0Lωp(T2) and the positive real numbers t0,t3 such that

    Ωr(f0,δ1,δ2)p,wψ(δ1,δ2)
    3

    holds for all δ1,δ2(0,t0)×(0,t3) with equivalence constants depending only on r and [w]Ap.

For functions in Lωp(T), p(1,), ωAp(T) Theorem 1 was obtained by the author in [ 1 ] . In this work we simplify the (long) proof given in [ 1 ] .

This type characterization theorem was proved in [ 26 ] (one dimensional case) for the spaces Lp(T), p[1,), with classical moduli of smoothness of fractional order. The class Φϱ describes completely the class of all majorants for the moduli of smoothness ωr(,δ)p in the space Lp(T), p[1,). For ωr(,δ)p, rN the characterization problem was investigated by O. V. Besov, S. B. Stechkin [ 4 ] , V. I. Kolyada [ 12 ] ; for ωr(,δ)p, r>0 the characterization theorem was obtained by S. Tikhonov [ 26 ] .

2 Preliminaries

Let L1(T2) be the collection of Lebesgue integrable functions f(x1,x2):T2R such that f(x1,x2) is 2π-periodic with respect to each variable x1,x2. Let 1<p<, ω(x1,x2)Ap(T2,J), and let Lωp(T2) be the collection of Lebesgue integrable functions f(x1,x2):T2R such that f(x1,x2) is 2π-periodic with respect to each variable x1,x2 and

fp,ω:=(T2|f(x1,x2)|pω(x1,x2)dx1dx2)1/p<.

When ω(x1,x2)1 we denote fp,1=:fp and L1p(T2)=:Lp(T2) for 1p<; L1(T2)=:L(T2).

We define Steklov type averages by

σh1,h2f(x1,x2)=14h1h2x1h1x1+h1x2h2x2+h2f(t,τ)dtdτ.σh1,f(x1,x2)=12hx1h1x1+h1f(t,τ)dt,σ,h2f(x1,x2)=12kx2h2x2+h2f(t,τ)dτ.

Lemma 2

[ 8 , Theorem 3.3 ] , [ 2 ] If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), then

{σh1,h2fp,ω,σh1,fp,ω,σ,h2fp,ω}fp,ω,
4

uniformly in h1,h2, where the constants depend only on [ω]Ap and p.

For 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), h1,h2, rN, we define the mixed differences by

h1,r,f(x1,x2)=(Iσh1,)rf(x1,x2),,h2,rf(x1,x2)=(Iσ,h2)rf(x1,x2),h1,h2r,rf(x1,x2)=h1,r,(,h2,rf)(x1,x2),

where I is identity operator on T2. Using the inequalities (4) we get

{h,r,fp,ω,,k,rfp,ω,h,kr,rfp,ω}fp,ω,
5

for 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), rN, with constants depending only on [ω]Ap and p,r.

The mixed modulus of smoothness of fLωp(T2), 1<p<, ω(x,y)Ap(T2,J), r{0}N, can be defined as

Unknown environment 'tabular'
6

If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), rN, then from (6) and (5) Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ωfp,ω with constant depending only on [ω]Ap and p,r.

Note that from the definition of Ωr(f,,)p,ω, it has the following properties when 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), rN:

  • Ωr(f,0,0)p,ω=0.

  • Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ω is subadditive with respect to f.

  • Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ωΩr(f,t1,t2)p,ω for 0δiti;i=1,2.

When ω(x1,x2)1 we denote Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,1=:Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p for 1p<; Ωr(f,δ1,δ2),1=:Ωr(f,δ1,δ2).

Let 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), and fLωp(T2), then there is λ(1,) such that fLλ(T2), namely, we have Lωp(T2)Lλ(T2) and this gives possibility to define the corresponding Fourier series of f.

Lemma 3

[ 2 ] If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), and fLωp(T2), then we have

L(T2)Lωp(T2)Lλ(T2)
7

for some λ>1.

We define Tm,n as the set of all trigonometric polynomials of degree at most m with respect to variable x1 and of degree at most n with respect to variable x2. Then

Ym1,m2(f)p,ω=inf{fi=12Tip,ω:TiTmi},

where Tmi is the set of all two dimensional trigonometric polynomials of degree at most mi with respect to variable xi (i=1,2)

Let 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J) and n1=0n2=0An1,n2(x1,x2) be the corresponding Fourier series for fLωp(T2). We define the partial sums of Fourier series of fLωp(T2), 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J) as

Sm,(f)(x1,x2)=n1=0mn2=0An1,n2(x1,x2,f),S,n(f)(x1,x2)=n1=0n2=0nAn1,n2(x1,x2,f),Sm1,m2(f)(x1,x2)=n1=0m1n2=0m2An1,n2(x1,x2,f).

Define the partial de la Valleè Poussin means of f as

Vm,(f)(x1,x2)=1m+1k=m2m1Sk,(f),V,n(f)(x1,x2)=1n+1l=n2n1S,l(f),Vm1,m2(f)(x1,x2)=1(n+1)(m+1)k=m12m11l=m22m21Sk,l(f).

Lemma 4

[ 2 ] If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2), then

{Sm,(f)p,ω,S,n(f)p,ω,Sm1,m2(f)p,ω}fp,ω,{Vm,(f)p,ω,V,n(f)p,ω,Vm1,m2(f)p,ω}fp,ω,fWm1,m2fp,ωYm1,m2(f)p,ω

where Wm1,m2f(x1,x2):=(Vm1,(f)+V,m2(f)Vm1,m2(f))(x1,x2) with all constants depending only on [ω]Ap and p.

By Theorem 6 of [ 13 ]

fCm1,m2αfp,ω0
11

as m1,m2 where Cm1,m2αf is αth Cesàro mean of f. From this we can deduce that C(T2) is a dense subset of Lωp(T2) for 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J). Then Ym1,m2(f)p,ωfCm1,m2αfp,ω0 and Ym1,m2(f)p,ω0 as m1,m2.

Let Wp,ωr,s, r,sN, (respectively Wp,ωr,;Wp,ω,s) denote the collection of functions fL1(Td) such that f(r,s)Lωp(Td) (respectively f(r,)Lωp(Td); f(,s)Lωp(Td)).

The following inequalities can be obtained by the method given in [ 2 ] . For 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), rN, there exist constants depending only on [ω]Ap and p,r so that

(i) (Jackson inequalities of Favard type)

Ym1,m2(g1)p,ω1(m1+1)2rg1(2r,)p,ω,g1Wp,ω2r,,Ym1,m2(g2)p,ω1(m2+1)2rg2(,2r)p,ω,g2Wp,ω,2r,Ym1,m2(g)p,ω1(m1+1)2r(m2+1)2rg(2r,2r)p,ω,gWp,ω2r,2r.

(ii) if δ1,δ2>0 then

Ωr(g1,δ,)p,ωδ2Ωr1(g1(2,),δ,)p,ω,g1Wp,ω2,,Ωr(g2,,ξ)p,ωξ2Ωr1(g2(,2),,ξ)p,ω,g2Wp,ω,2,Ωr(g,δ1,δ2)p,ωδ12δ22Ωr1(g(2,2),δ1,δ2)p,ω,gWp,ω2,2.

and hence

Ωr(f,δ,)p,ωδ2rf(2r,)p,ω,Ωr(f,,ξ)p,ωξ2rf(,2r)p,ω,Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ωδ12rδ22rf(2r,2r)p,ω.

Definition 5

The mixed K-functional is defined as

K(f,δ1,δ2,p,ω,r,s):=:=infg1,g2,g{fg1g2gp,ω+δ1rrg1xrp,ω+δ2ssg2ysp,ω+δ1rδ2sr+sgxrysp,ω}

where the infimum is taken for all g1, g2, g so that g1Wp,ωr,, g2Wp,ω,s,gWp,ωr,s where r,sN, 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2).

(iii) If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2) and rN, then there exist constants depending only on Muckenhoupt’s constant [ω]Ap of ω and p,r so that the equivalence

Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ωK(f,δ1,δ2,p,ω,2r)
18

and the properties

Ωr(f,λδ1,ηδ2)p,ω(1+λ)2r(1+η)2rΩr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ω,Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,ωδ12rδ22rΩr(f,t1,t2)p,ωt12rt22r,0<tiδi;i=1,2,

hold for δ1,δ2>0, where x:=max{zZ:zx}.

(iv) (11) can be refined by the inequality (19) below [ 2 ] . If 1<p<, ωAp(T2,J), fLωp(T2) and rN, then there exists C[ω]Ap,p,r depending only on Muckenhoupt’s constant [ω]Ap of ω and p,r so that

Ym1,m2(f)p,ωC[ω]Ap,p,rΩr(f,1m1,1m2)p,ω
19

where m1,m2N.

3 Proof of Theorem 1

Let ωr(,δ1,δ2)p, 1p, be the usual nonweighted mixed modulus of smoothness:

ωr(g,δ1,δ2)p:=sup0h1δ1,0h2δ2(ITh1,)r(IT,h2)rgp,\quad gLp(T2),

where Th1,g(x1,x2):=g(x1+h1,x2); T,h2g(x1,x2):=g(x1,x2+h2). From [ 25 ] (1p<) and [ 6 ] (p=) and (18) there exist positive constants, depending only r,p, such that

ω2r(g,δ1,δ2)pΩr(g,δ1,δ2)p
20

holds for 1p and gLp(T2).

Theorem 2.5 of [ 26 ] give that: Let rN, p[1,].

(a) If fLp(T2), then there exists ψΦr,r such that

ωr(f,t1,t2)pψ(t1,t2)
21

holds for all t1,t2(0,)×(0,) with equivalence constants depending only on r.

(b) If ψΦr,r then there exist f0Lp(T2) and the positive real numbers t0,t3 such that

ωr(f0,δ1,δ2)pψ(δ1,δ2)
22

holds for all δ1,δ2(0,t0)×(0,t3) with equivalence constants depending only on r.

Proof â–¼
[Proof of Theorem 1] (i) Note that if FC(T2) then from (7)

h1,h2r,rFp,wCp,[w]Aph1,h2r,rFC(T2).
23

Using Theorem 2.5 (A) of [ 26 ] , (7), (20), (18), (23) there exists ψΦ2r such that

Ωr(F,δ1,δ2)p,wCp,[w]ApΩr(F,δ1,δ2)Cp,[w]Apω2r(F,δ1,δ2)Cr,p,[w]Apψ(δ1,δ2).

If p(1,), Ap(T2,J), fLωp(T2), then, by (11), for any ε>0 there exists FC(T2) such that fFp,w<ε. Thus

Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,wΩr(fF,δ1,δ2)p,w+Ωr(F,δ1,δ2)p,wCr,p,[w]ApfFp,w+Cr,p,[w]Apψ(δ1,δ2).

Letting ε0+ we get

Ωr(f,δ1,δ2)p,wCr,p,[w]Apψ(δ1,δ2).

On the other hand, from (18), (20), (7) and Theorem 2.5 (A) of [ 26 ]

ψ(δ1,δ2)Cr,p,[w]Apω2r(f,δ1,δ2)1Cr,p,[w]ApΩr(f,δ1,δ2)p,w

and the equivalence (2) is established.

(ii) For the equivalence (3) let ψΦ2r. By Theorem 2.5 (B) and Remark 2.7 (1) of [ 26 ] there exist fL(T2) and the positive real numbers t0,t3 such that

ω2r(f,δ1,δ2)pψ(δ1,δ2),p=1,

holds for all δ1,δ2(0,t0)×(0,t3) with equivalence constants depending only on r. Then by (18), (20) we get

ψ(δ1,δ2)Crω2r(f,δ1,δ2)1CrΩr(f,δ1,δ2)1Cr,p,[w]ApΩr(f,δ1,δ2)p,wCr,p,[w]ApΩr(f,δ1,δ2)Cr,p,[w]Apω2r(f,δ1,δ2)Cr,p,[w]Apψ(δ1,δ2)

for all δ1,δ2(0,t0)×(0,t3).

Proof â–¼

Acknowledgements

The author wish to express his sincere gratitude to the referee(s) for his/her valuable suggestions.

Bibliography

1

R. Akgün, Realization and characterization of modulus of smoothness in weighted Lebesgue spaces, Algebra i Analiz, 26, pp. 64–87, 2014; St. Petersburg Math. J., 26 (2015), pp. 741–756. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

2

R. Akgün, Mixed modulus of continuity in Lebesgue spaces with Muckenhoupt weights, In press, Turkish Math. J., 40, 2016. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

3

E. Berkson and T.A. Gillespie, On restrictions of multipliers in weighted setting , Indiana Univ. Math. J., 52 (2003), pp. 927–961. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

4

O.V. Besov and S.B. Stechkin, A description of the moduli of continuity in L2, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 134 (1977), pp. 27–30.

5

P.L. Butzer, H. Dyckhoff, E. Görlich and R. L. Stens, Best trigonometric approximation, fractional order derivatives and Lipschitz classes, Canad. J. Math., 29 (1977), pp. 781–793. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

6

C. Cottin, Mixed K-functionals: a measure of smoothness for blending-type approximation, Math. Z., 204 (1990), pp. 69–83. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

7

R. Fefferman and E. Stein, Singular integrals in product spaces, Adv. Math., 45 (1982), pp. 117–143. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

8

A. Guven and V. Kokilashvili, On the mean summability by Cesaro method of Fourier trigonometric series in two-weighted setting, J. Inequal. Appl., bf 2006, Article ID: 41837 (2006), pp. 1–15. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

9

R. Hunt, B. Muckenhoupt and R. Wheeden, Weighted norm inequalities for the conjugate function and Hilbert transform, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 176 (1973), pp. 227–251. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

10

D.M. Israfilov, Approximation by p-Faber Polynomials in the Weighted Smirnov Class Ep(G,ω) and the Bieberbach Polynomials, Constr. Approx., 17 (2001), pp. 335–351. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

11

S.Z. Jafarov, On moduli of smoothness in Orlicz classes, Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb., 33 (2010), pp. 95–100.

12

V.I. Kolyada, Imbedding in the classes φ(L), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 39 (1975), pp. 418–437.

13

A.D. Nakhman and B.P. Osilenker, Estimates of weighted norms of some operators generated by multiple trigonometric Fourier series, Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedeni Matematika, 239 (1982), pp. 39–50 (Russian).

14

M. K. Potapov, Approximation by "angle" (in Russian), In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Constructive Theory of Functions and Approximation Theory, Budapest, 1969; Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 371–399, 1972.

15

M. K. Potapov, The Hardy-Littlewood and Marcinkiewicz-Littlewood-Paley theorems, approximation "by an angle", and the imbedding of certain classes of functions, in Russian, Mathematica (Cluj), 14 (1972), pp. 339–362.

16

M. K. Potapov, A certain imbedding theorem in Russian, Mathematica (Cluj), 14 (1972), pp. 123–146.

17

M. K. Potapov, Approximation "by angle", and imbedding theorems, in Russian, Math. Balkanica, 2 (1972), pp. 183–198.

18

M. K. Potapov, Imbedding of classes of functions with a dominating mixed modulus of smoothness in Russian, Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov., 131 (1974), pp. 199–210.

19

M. K. Potapov and B. V. Simonov, On the relations between generalized classes of Besov-Nikolskiı̆ and Weyl-Nikolskiı̆ functions, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 214 (1996), pp. 243–259.

20

M. K. Potapov, B.V. Simonov and B. Lakovich, On estimates for the mixed modulus of continuity of a function with a transformed Fourier series, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N S), 58 (1995), pp. 167–192.

21

M.K. Potapov, B. V. Simonov and S. Y. Tikhonov, Embedding theorems for Besov-Nikolskiı̆ and Weyl-Nikolskiı̆ classes in a mixed metric, Moscow Univ. Math. Bull., 59 (2005), pp. 19–26.

22

M.K. Potapov, B. V. Simonov and S. Y. Tikhonov, Transformation of Fourier series using power and weakly oscillating sequences, Math. Notes., 77 (2005), pp. 90–107. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

23

M.K. Potapov, B. V. Simonov and S. Y. Tikhonov, Relations between mixed moduli of smoothness and embedding theorems for the Nikolskiı̆ classes, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 269 (2010), pp. 197–207. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

24

M.K. Potapov, B. V. Simonov and S. Y. Tikhonov, Mixed moduli of smoothness in Lp,1<p< : A survey, Surv. Approx. Theory, 8 (2013), pp. 1–57.

25

K.V. Runovski, Several questions of approximation theory, PhD Disser. Cand. Nauk., Moscow State University MGU, Moscow, Russia, 1989.

26

S. Tikhonov, On moduli of smoothness of fractional order, Real Anal. Exchange., 30, pp. 1–12, (2004/2005).

27

A.F. Timan, Theory of approximation of functions of a real variable, London: Pergamon Press, 1963.

28

M. F. Timan, Approximation and properties of periodic functions, Dnepropetrovsk: "Fedorchenko", 2011.

29

Y. E. Yildirir and D.M. Israfilov, Approximation theorems in weighted Lorentz spaces, Carpathian J. Math., 26 (2010), pp. 108–119.