Return to Article Details A separation of some Seiffert-type means by power means

A separation of some Seiffert-type means by power means

Iulia Costin Gheorghe Toader§

June 12, 2012

Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Baritiu st. no. 28, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: Iulia.Costin@cs.utcluj.ro.

§Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Baritiu st. no. 25, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: Gheorghe.Toader@math.utcluj.ro.

Consider the identric mean I, the logarithmic mean L, two trigonometric means defined by H. J. Seiffert and denoted by P and T, and the hyperbolic mean M defined by E. Neuman and J. Sándor. There are a number of known inequalities between these means and some power means Ap. We add to these inequalities some new results obtaining the following chain of inequalities

A0<L<A1/3<P<A2/3<I<A3/3<M<A4/3<T<A5/3.

MSC. 26E60

Keywords. Seiffert type means; power means; logarithmic mean; identric mean; inequalities of means.

1 Introduction

A mean is a function M:R+2R+, with the property

min(a,b)M(a,b)max(a,b),a,b>0.

Each mean is reflexive, that is

M(a,a)=a,a>0.

This is also used as the definition of M(a,a).

A mean is symmetric if

M(b,a)=M(a,b),a,b>0;

it is homogeneous (of degree 1) if

M(ta,tb)=tM(a,b),a,b,t>0.

We shall refer here to the following symmetric and homogeneous means:

- the power means Ap, defined by

Ap(a,b)=[ap+bp2]1p,p0;

- the geometric mean G, defined as G(a,b)=ab, but verifying also the property

limp0Ap(a,b)=A0(a,b)=G(a,b);

- the identric mean I defined by

I(a,b)=1e(aabb)1ab,ab;

- the Gini mean S defined by

S(a,b)=(aabb)1a+b;

- the first Seiffert mean P, defined in [ 9 ] by

P(a,b)=ab2sin1aba+b,ab;

- the second Seiffert mean T, defined in [ 10 ] by

T(a,b)=ab2tan1aba+b,ab;

- the Neuman-Sándor mean M, defined in [ 6 ] by

M(a,b)=ab2sinh1aba+b,ab;

- the logarithmic mean L defined by

L(a,b)=ablnalnb,ab.

As remarked B.C. Carlson in [ 1 ] , the logarithmic mean can be represented also by

L(a,b)=ab2tanh1aba+b,ab,

thus the last four means are very similar.

Being rather complicated, these means were evaluated by simpler means, first of all by power means. For two means M and N we write M<N if M(a,b)<N(a,b) for ab. It is known that the family of power means is an increasing family of means, thus

Ap<Aq if p<q.

The evaluation of a given mean M by power means assumes the determination of some real indices p and q such that Ap<M<Aq. The evaluation is optimal if p is the the greatest and q is the smallest index with this property. This means that M cannot be compared with Ar if p<r<q.

Optimal evaluation were given for the logarithmic mean in [ 5 ]

A0<L<A1/3,

for the identric mean in [ 8 ]

A2/3<I<Aln2,

and for the first Seiffert mean in [ 3 ]

Aln2/lnπ<P<A2/3.

Following evaluations are also known:

A1/3<P<A2/3,

proved in [ 4 ] ,

A1<T<A2,

given in [ 10 ] ,

A1<M<T,

as it was shown in [ 6 ] and

S>A2

as it is proved in [ 7 ] . In [ 2 ] it is proven that

M<A3/2<T
1

and using some of the above results, it is obtained the following chain of inequalities

A0<L<A1/2<P<A1<M<A3/2<T<A2.

Here we retain another chain of inequalities

A0<L<A1/3<P<A2/3<I<A1<M<T<A2<S.
2

Our aim is to prove that A4/3 can be put between M and T and A2 can be replaced by A5/3. We obtain so another nice separation of these means by “equidistant" power means.

2 Main results

We add to the inequalities (2) the next results.

Theorem 1

The following inequalities

M<A4/3<T<A5/3

hold.

Proof â–¼
As the means are symmetric and homogenous, for the first inequality
ab2sinh1aba+b<(a4/3+b4/32)34,ab,

we can assume that a>b and denote a/b=t3>1. The inequality becomes

t312sinh1t31t3+1<(t4+12)34,t>1,

or

234(t31)2(t4+1)34<sinh1t31t3+1,t>1.

Denoting

f(t)=sinh1t31t3+1214(t31)(t4+1)34

we have to prove that f(t)>0 for t>1. As f(1)=0, we want to prove that f(t)>0 for t>1. We have

f(t)=6t2(t3+1)2(t6+1)2143t2(t+1)(t4+1)74=3t2[234(t4+1)74(t+1)(t3+1)t6+1]214(t3+1)t6+1(t4+1)74

and so it is positive if

g(t)=[234(t4+1)74]4[(t+1)(t3+1)t6+1]4

is positive. Or

g(t)=(t1)4(7t24+24t23+48t22+68t21+112t20+184t19+264t18+296t17+344t16+428t15+512t14+488t13+466t12+488t11+512t10+428t9+344t8+296t7+184t5+112t4+68t3+48t2+24t+7)

so that the property is certainly true. The second inequality is a simple consequence of (1) because A4/3<A3/2. For the last inequality

ab2tan1aba+b<(a5/3+b5/32)35,ab,

we can again consider ab=t3>1 and we have to prove that

t312tan1t31t3+1<(t5+12)35,t>1.

This is equivalent with the condition that the function

h(t)=tan1t31t3+1t31225(t5+1)35

is positive for t>1. As h(1)=0 and

h(t)=3t2t6+13t2(t2+1)225(t5+1)85=3t2[225(t5+1)85(t2+1)(t6+1)]225(t5+1)85(t6+1),

we have h(t)>0 for t>1 if h(t)>0 for t>1, thus if the function

k(t)=[225(t5+1)85]5[(t2+1)(t6+1)]5

is positive for t>1. Or this is obvious because

k(t)=(t1)4(185t28+200t27+221t26+365t24+410t22+520t19+580t18+520t17+430t16+400t15+410t14+440t13+365t12+284t11+221t10+200t9+185t8+140t7+90t6+60t5+45t4+25t2+40t3+12t+3).

Remark 2

For the factorization of the polynomials g and k we have used the computer algebra Maple.â–¡

Remark 3

It is an open problem for us to find a mean N, related to the above mentioned means, with the property that

A5/3<N<A2.

For instance, the mean S, which is similar to I, is not convenient as follows from (2).â–¡

Corollary 4

For each x(0,1) we have the following evaluations

1<xsinh1x<A4/3(1x,1+x)<xtan1x<A5/3(1x,1+x).

Bibliography

1

B.C. Carlson, The logarithmic mean, Amer. Math. Monthly, 79 (1972), pp. 615–618.

2

I. Costin and G. Toader, A nice evaluation of some Seiffert type means by power means, Int. J. Math. Math. Sc., 2012, Article ID 430692, 6 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/430692.

3

P.A. Hästö, Optimal inequalities between Seiffert’s means and power means, Math. Inequal. Appl., 7 (2004) no. 1, pp. 47–53.

4

A.A. Jagers, Solution of problem 887, Niew Arch. Wisk. (Ser. 4), 12 (1994), pp. 230–231.

5

T.P. Lin, The power and the logarithmic mean, Amer. Math. Monthly, 81 (1974), pp. 879–883.

6

E. Neuman and J. Sándor, On the Schwab-Borchardt mean, Math. Panon., 14 (2003) no. 2, pp. 253–266.

7

E. Neuman and J. Sándor, Comparison inequalities for certain bivariate means, Appl. Anal. Discrete Math., 3 (2009), pp. 46–51.

8

A.O. Pittenger, Inequalities between arithmetic and logarithmic means, Univ. Beograd. Publ. Elektrotehn. Fak. Ser. Mat. Fiz., 678-715 (1980), pp. 15–18.

9

H.-J. Seiffert, Problem 887, Niew Arch. Wisk. (Ser. 4), 11 (1993), pp. 176–176.

10

H.-J. Seiffert, Aufgabe β16, Die Wurzel, 29 (1995), pp. 221–222.