Return to Article Details Bilateral inequalities for means

Bilateral Inequalities for Means

Mira-Cristiana Anisiu Valeriu Anisiu §

October 24, 2013.

“T. Popoviciu” Institute of Numerical Analysis, Romanian Academy, P.O. Box 68, 400110 Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: mira@math.ubbcluj.ro.

§“Babeş-Bolyai” University, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, 1 Kogălniceanu St., 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: anisiu@math.ubbcluj.ro.

Let (M1,M2,M3) be three means in two variables chosen from H, G, L, I, A, Q, S, C so that

M1(a,b)<M2(a,b)<M3(a,b),0<a<b.

We consider the problem of finding α, βR for which

αM1(a,b)+(1α)M3(a,b)<M2(a,b)<βM1(a,b)+(1β)M3(a,b).

We solve the problem for the triplets (G,L,A), (G,A,Q), (G,A,C), (G,Q,C), (A,Q,C), (A,S,C), (A,Q,S) and (L,A,C). The Symbolic Algebra Program Maple is used to determine the range where some parameters can vary, or to find the minimal polynomial for an algebraic number.

MSC. 26D15, 26E60; 26-04

Keywords. Two-variable means, weighted arithmetic mean, inequalities, symbolic computer algebra.

1 Introduction

We remind the definitions of the classical means, namely, for 0<a<b

  • the arithmetic, geometric and harmonic ones

    A=a+b2,  G=ab,  H=2aba+b,

    as well as

  • the Hölder and the anti-harmonic mean Q=(a2+b22)1/2, C=a2+b2a+b;

  • the Pólya & Szegő logarithmic mean, the exponential (or identric), and the weighted geometric mean

    L=balnblna, I=1e(bbaa)1/(ba), S=(aabb)1/(a+b).

References on means and inequalities between them can be found in [ 5 ] .

At first, the following inequalities between means were established

H<G<L<I<A<Q<S<C,
followed by relations between some means and the arithmetic means of two others ( [ 7 ] , [ 3 ] )
L<G+A2, G+Q2<A<G+C2<Q<A+C2<S.

A more difficult problem is to obtain results of the type (3) for weighted arithmetic means and to determine the maximal interval for the parameter for which the inequalities hold.

We mention here an inequality proved by Alzer and Qiu for the means G,I and A.

1

[ 1 ] The double inequality

\begin{equation} \alpha A(a,b)+(1-\alpha )G(a,b) 1

holds true for all positive real numbers ab, if and only if α2/3 and β2/e.

Results of this type continued to appear, recent ones are given in [ 9 ] for (H,L,A) and (H,I,A), and in [ 4 ] for (G,L,C).

Let M1, M2, M3 be three means out of the eight listed in (3) so that

M_1(a,b )< M_2(a,b) < M_3(a,b).
We consider the problem of finding α, βR for which
αM_1(a,b)+(1-α)M_3(a,b)<M_2(a,b)
and
M_2(a,b)<βM_1(a,b)+(1-β)M_3(a,b).
The inequalities (1) and (1) are equivalent to

α>M3(a,b)M2(a,b)M3(a,b)M1(a,b),
2

respectively

β<M3(a,b)M2(a,b)M3(a,b)M1(a,b).
3

Basically, denoting by t=b/a, t>1, the problem reduces to find inff and supf, where

f(t)=M3(1,t)M2(1,t)M3(1,t)M1(1,t).
4

The function f is obviously bounded, 0f(t)1. If supf is attained at some t (1,), then α(supf,); otherwise α[supf,). Similarly, β(,inff) if inff is attained in (1,), and β(,inff] otherwise. Symbolic Algebra Programs can be of great help to determine the range where the parameters can vary. Maple was used in [ 3 ] to find the interval for α in Theorem 9 below. We also use it to simplify the polynomials in the proof of Theorem 5 and to obtain the optimal value β0 of β.

Starting from the means listed in (3), we can formulate (83)=56 bilateral inequalities of the type (1). We shall choose seven of them, for which one of (1) and (1) was already proved in [ 3 ] , and we shall find the possible values of the parameter for the remaining one. Then, for L<A<C we find the optimal intervals for α and β in order that both inequalities (1) and (1) hold. To this aim Maple is again very useful.

2 Bilateral inequalities

We consider means in two variables, but we prefer to use a simpler (and shorter) notation.

Let us denote for 0<a<b, t=b/a, t>1. It it obvious, due to the homogeneity, that, if M(a,b) is any mean from (3), it suffices to prove the inequalities for M(1,t). We shall write from now on M(t) instead of M(1,t).

2

The double inequality

αG(t)+(1α)A(t)<L(t)<βG(t)+(1β)A(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α1 and β2/3.

Proof â–¼

We denote, for t>1,

f1(t)=A(t)L(t)A(t)G(t)=(t+1)lnt2(t1)(t+12t)lnt.
5

Let us suppose that the first inequality in the theorem holds. From
limtf1(t)=1 it follows obviously that α1. Conversely, if α1 it suffices to have

A(t)L(t)A(t)G(t)<1,

which is true because L(t)>G(t). We evaluate f1(t)2/3, where 2/3=limt1f1(t) and show that it is positive. The denominator is obviously positive; we substitute u=t in the numerator and obtain

f(u)=(u2+4u+1)lnu3u2+3.

We have f(1)=f(1)=f(1)=0 and f(u)=2(u1)2/u3>0 for u>1, hence f1(t)>2/3 for t>1. It follows that L(t)<βG(t)+(1β)A(t), t>1 if and only if β2/3.

3

The double inequality

αG(t)+(1α)Q(t)<A(t)<βG(t)+(1β)Q(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α1/2 and β12/2.

Proof â–¼

Let us consider for t>1, the function

f2(t)=Q(t)A(t)Q(t)G(t)=1t2+1+2t2(t+1)2.
6

We have f2(t)<1/2, since t2+1+2t>2/2 (t+1)2 t2+1>2/2 (t+1) (t1)2>0. Since limt1f2(t)=1/2, it follows that αG(t)+(1α)Q(t)<A(t), t>1 if and only if α1/2.

Let us suppose that A(t)<βG(t)+(1β)Q(t), t>1. Since
limtf2(t)=12/2, it follows that β12/2. Conversely, if β12/2, it suffices to prove that f2(t)>12/2. This is equivalent with

t2+1+2t(t+1)2<1,

i. e. t2+1+2t<(t+1)2 and this is true because t2+1+2t<t+1+2t<(t+1)2.

4

The double inequality

αG(t)+(1α)C(t)<A(t)<βG(t)+(1β)C(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α2/3 and β1/2.

Proof â–¼

For t>1 we define

f3(t)=C(t)A(t)C(t)G(t)=(t1)22(t2+1t(t+1)).
7

Since limt1f3(t)=2/3, from αG(t)+(1α)C(t)<A(t), t>1 it follows that α2/3. If α2/3, it is true that f3(t)<α, because f3(t)<2/3 is equivalent with

tt+t+1<13,

or (t1)2>0.

Similarly, it follows that f3(t)>1/2, since

f3(t)12=t(t1)22(t2+1t(t+1))=t2(t+t+1)>0.

The infimum of f3 on (1,) is precisely 1/2, because limtf3(t)=1/2

5

The double inequality

αG(t)+(1α)C(t)<Q(t)<βG(t)+(1β)C(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α12/2 and β<β0, where β00.3471574308... is the unique positive root of the polynomial

9x426x3+22x22x1.
Proof â–¼

We have to find, for t>1, the extreme values of

f4(t)=C(t)Q(t)C(t)G(t)=2t22t2+12tt2+1+22(t2t32t+1).
8

Denoting by u=t, we compute the derivative of

h(u)=f4(u2)

and we obtain

h(u)=(u+1)(2(u4+1)(u44u21)+u6+2u5+3u4+3u2+2u+1)2(u4+1)(u1)3(u2+u+1)2.

So, the roots of the derivative satisfy the algebraic equation

2(u4+1)(u4+4u2+1)2=(u6+2u5+3u4+3u2+2u+1)2.

After the simplification of a quartic polynomial whose roots are not in the interval (1,), we obtain the equation

u88u510u48u3+1=0,
9

which has a unique root u0 in the interval (1,). This can be easily proved by using the Sturm sequence. Then u0 will be the unique root of h in (1,).

Now h(2)>0, h(3)<0, so 2<u0<3 and h is strictly increasing in the interval (1,u0) and strictly decreasing in the interval (u0,). We also have limu1h(u)=1/3, limuh(u)=12/2 and therefore inff4=infh=12/2, supf4=suph=h(u0)=β0.

Since h(u0) is an algebraic number, we can easily find its minimal polynomial by performing the following commands in Maple:

> M:= g(theta):

> sqrfree(evala(Norm(convert(Z-M,RootOf))),Z)[2][1][1];

9x426x3+22x22x1

Notice that Maple is of course able to express the maximum h(u0) in terms of radicals by executing the command:

but the resulting expression is cumbersome and we will not print it here.

6

The double inequality

αA(t)+(1α)C(t)<Q(t)<βA(t)+(1β)C(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α22 and β1/2.

Proof â–¼

Let us consider, for t>1

f5(t)=C(t)Q(t)C(t)A(t)=2(t2+1)(t+1)2(t2+1)(t1)2.
10

From limtf5(t)=22 it follows that αA(t)+(1α)C(t)<Q(t), t>1 implies α22. Now if α22 we have to prove that f5(t)<22, which can be written as 2(t2+1)(t+1)>2t2+(4+22)t2. If 2t2+(4+22)t20, the inequality holds. Otherwise, squaring both sides it reduces to 4(3+22)t(t1)2>0.

We obtain also

f5(t)12=3(t2+1)+2t2(t+1)2(t2+1)2(t1)2>0,

because (3(t2+1)+2t)28(t+1)2(t2+1)>0 (t1)4>0. We have limt1f5(t)=1/2, hence this is the infimum of f5 on (1,) and the second part of the theorem is also true.

7

[ 3 ] For t>1, the following inequality holds

ttt+1>tlnt.
11
Proof â–¼

The inequality (11) is equivalent to

tt+1lnt>ln(tlnt).

We consider the function

k(t)=ln(tlnt)t1tlnt,  t>1,

with

k(t)=(lnt1)lntt2(tlnt).

It has limt1k(t)=0, limtk(t)=0 and a minimum at t0=e. It follows that k(t)<0 on (1,), hence ((t1)/t)lnt>ln(tlnt). It follows that

tt+1lnt>t1tlnt>ln(tlnt).

8

The double inequality

αA(t)+(1α)C(t)<S(t)<βA(t)+(1β)C(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α1/2 and β0.

Proof â–¼

We define

f6(t)=C(t)S(t)C(t)A(t)=2t2+1(t+1)ttt+1(t1)2.
12

We have

f6(t)12=3(t2+1)+2t4(t+1)ttt+12(t1)2=2(t+1)(t1)2g(t),

where

g(t)=3(t2+1)+2t4(t+1)ttt+1.

Then

g(t)=g1(t)4(t+1)2,

where

g1(t)=4ttt+1(t+1+lnt)+13t26t.
13

Using the fact that S>Q, i. e. tt/(t+1)>(t2+1)/2, we obtain that g1(t)>2(t2+1)g2(t), where

g2(t)=2(t+1+lnt)(3t2+6t1)/2(t2+1).

The derivative of g2 is

g2(t)=(t+1)(2(t2+1))3(3t4+7t2+6t)t(t2+1)2(t2+1).

In order to establish its sign we consider the polynomial

P(t)=(t+1)^22(t^2+1)^6-3t^4+7t^2+6t^2
=t^6t-1^28t^6+32t^5+52t^4+36t^3+19t^2+14t-1.

The expression from the last parenthesis is obviously decreasing for t1 and it is positive for t=10. It follows that it is positive on (1,10), hence on this interval P is also positive. Therefore g2(t)>0, g2(t)>g2(1)=0, so g1 is positive too for 1<t<10.

Let us consider now that t10. Using (11) in (13) we obtain that g1(t)>g3(t), where

g3(t)=t22t+2(2lnt+1)2.

For

g4(t)=t22t+22lnt1,

the sign of g4 is given by t2t2t22t+2; but (t2t)24(t22t+2)= (t10)4+38(t10)3+537(t10)2+3348(t10)+7772>0 for t10. It follows that g3(t)g3(10)=3.45...>0, hence g1 is positive for t10 too.

In conclusion, g1(t)>0 on (1,), therefore g(t)<0 on (1,). The function g being decreasing, g(t)<g(1)=0 for t>1 and f6(t)<1/2 for t>1.

The second part of the theorem follows from limtf6(t)=0 and f6(t)>0, t>1.

9

The double inequality

αA(t)+(1α)S(t)<Q(t)<βA(t)+(1β)S(t),t>1

holds if and only if α22 and β0.

Proof â–¼

We shall prove that the first inequality holds for α=22 (hence a fortiori for α22).

Let us denote

H(t,α)=Q(t)αA(t)(1α)S(t)=122+2t212α(1+t)(1α)tt1+t.
14

and

h1(t)=(2+1)H(t,22),

where H is given in (14). We have to prove that h1(t)>0 for t>1. It follows that

h1(t)=(2+1)2(t2+1)22(t+1)2ttt+1.

We put in the inequality (1+x)q<1+qx, which holds for x>0, 0<q<1, x=t1 and q=t/(t+1). It follows that

ttt+1<t2+1t+1,

and

h1(t)>(1+2)2(t+1)((t+1)2+2t22(t2+2(21)t+1)).

Let us denote the positive expressions

h2(t)=(t+1)2+2t2,   h3(t)=2(t2+2(21)t+1);

it follows easily that h22(t)h32(t)=4t(t1)2, therefore h1(t)>0.

The second part of the theorem is obvious, since

f7(t)=S(t)Q(t)S(t)A(t)

satisfies f7(t)>0, t>1 and limt1f7(t)=0.

10

The double inequality

αL(t)+(1α)C(t)<A(t)<βL(t)+(1β)C(t),t>1,

holds if and only if α3/4 and β1/2.

Proof â–¼

We have to find the extreme values of

f8(t)=C(t)A(t)C(t)L(t)

for t>1, where f8 is given by

f8(t)=12(t1)2lntlnt+t2lntt2+1.

We obtain

f8(t)=(t1)h3(t)2t(lnt+t2lntt2+1)2,

where

h4(t)=t32(t2lnt)2+2t2lntt22tlnt2t(lnt)2t+1.

Now, h4(1)=h4(1)=h4(1)=h4(1)=0 and

h4(4)(t)=8(t1)lntt3>0 for t>1.

Therefore h4>0 in (1,) and f8<0 in (1,). The function f8 being strictly decreasing on (1,), inff8=limtf8(t)=1/2 and supf8=limt1f8(t)=3/4.

3 Final remarks

From the eight means considered in this paper, two enter the class of Gini means [ 6 ] defined for a,b>0, u,vR,

Misplaced &

namely S=G1,1, C=G2,1; two belong to the class of Stolarsky means [ 8 ] defined for a,b>0, ab, u,vR,

Misplaced &

namely L=E1,0, I=E1,1. The other four are in both classes, namely H=G1,0=E2,1, G=G0,0=E0,0, A=G1,0=E2,1 and Q=G2,0=E4,2. As it was shown in [ 2 ] , the families of Gini means Gu,v and Stolarsky means Er,s have in common only the power means. So even if general results will be proved for these two classes of means, not all the inequalities from this paper will be consequences; for example, in the last theorem L is a Stolarsky mean, while C is a Gini one.

Bibliography

1

H. Alzer and S. L. Qiu, Inequalities for means in two variables, Arch. Math. (Basel), 80 (2003), pp. 201–215.

2

H. Alzer and S. Ruscheweyh, On the intersection of two-parameter mean value families, Proc. A. M. S., 129(9) (2001), pp. 2655–2662.

3

M. C. Anisiu and V. Anisiu, Refinement of some inequalities for means, Rev. Anal. Numér. Théor. Approx., 35 (2006) no. 1, pp. 5–10. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

4

M. C. Anisiu and V. Anisiu, Logarithmic mean and weighted sum of geometric and anti-harmonic means, Rev. Anal. Numér. Théor. Approx., 41 (2012) no. 2, pp. 95–98. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}

5

P. S. Bullen, Handbook of Means and Their Inequalities, Series: Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 560, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 2003.

6

C. Gini, Di una formula comprensiva delle medie, Metron, 13 (1938), pp. 3–22.

7

M. Ivan and I. Raşa, Some inequalities for means, Tiberiu Popoviciu Itinerant Seminar of Functional Equations, Approximation and Convexity, Cluj-Napoca, May 23-29, 2000, pp. 99–102.

8

K. B. Stolarsky, Generalizations of the logarithmic mean, Math. Mag., 48 (1975), pp. 87–92.

9

W. F. Xia and Y. M. Chu, Optimal inequalities related to the logarithmic, identric, arithmetic and harmonic means, Rev. Anal. Numér. Théor. Approx., 39 (2010) no. 2, pp. 176–183. \includegraphics[scale=0.1]{ext-link.png}