Some general distortion results for and
Abstract.
In this paper we present some general distortion results for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions of order on the unit disc. For this, we start from a classical result for the class of univalent and normalized functions on the unit disc. This inequality can be found, for example, in [2, p. 70, ex. 6]. Furthermore, since when these classes reduce to the well-known classes of starlike and convex functions, we obtain also some general distortion results for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions on the unit disc.
30C45, 30C50.
Univalent functions, starlikeness of order , convexity of order , coefficient estimates, distortion results.
1. Introduction
In this paper we denote the open unit disc in the complex plane and the family of all univalent (holomorphic and injective) normalized () functions on the unit disc. It is well-known (see [2], [4] or [7]) or that if , then
(1) |
and it is easy to prove that
(2) |
The basic result from which we start in this paper is the following estimate which can be found, for example, in (see [2], p. 70, ex. 6):
Taking into account the Bieberbach’s Conjecture (proved in 1984 by L. de Branges), we can prove the previous inequality using the thchnique of dominant power series. Also, there are similar results for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions on the unit disc (see [4], p. 117, Th. 8 and Th. 9). Recall that if is univalent on and is a convex domain, respectively if is univalent on , and is a starlike domain with respect to the origin.
In this paper, we extend the previous inequalities for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions of order on the unit disc, with . These classes was introduced by M.S. Robertson in [10]. We denote
the class of convex (normalized) functions of order on and
the class of starlike (normalized) functions of order on .
Remark 1.1.
It is obvious that for we obtain the well-known classes
and
of convex, respectively starlike functions on the unit disc in the complex plane .
In the following two sections we present some general distortion results for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions of order on the unit disc, where . For this, we start from a classical result for the class of univalent and normalized functions on the unit disc. This inequality can be found, for example, in [2, p. 70, ex. 6]. The classes of starlike, respectively convex functions of order were first introduced by M.S. Robertson (see [10]). More results about the starlike and convex functions of order can be found in [4], [5], [6], [8], [9] or [11].
2. Preliminaries
Similar to Bieberbach’s Conjecture, we have estimates of coefficients also for the classes and as we can see in the following proposition. For details and proofs, one may consult [10, p. 386], [6, Lemma 2.1] or [11, p. 65, Th. 2].
Proposition 2.1.
Let . The following estimates hold:
-
(1)
If , then
(3) -
(2)
If , then
(4)
These estimates for are sharp. Notice also that for , we obtain the well-known result .
Next, we present two distortion theorems for , respectively . These theorems are essentially due to Robertson (see [10]). For details and proofs, one may consult also [8, p. 86, Th. 4.4.5 and Th. 4.4.6] , [5, p. 56, Th. 2.3.6 and Th. 2.3.7] or [9, p. 727, Th. 3 and Th. 4].
Theorem 2.2.
(Growth and distortion theorem for ):
Let and . Then
If , then
If , then
for all . These bounds are sharp. Equality holds in each of the above relations for
(5) |
where and .
Theorem 2.3.
(Growth and distortion theorem for ):
Let and . Then
and
for all . These bounds are sharp. Equality holds for
(6) |
Remark 2.4.
When , we obtatin the growth and distortion results for the classes and of convex, respectively starlike functions on the unit disc.
Remark 2.5.
Let . Then, for every , the following relation hold
(7) |
This remark will be used in the next section as part of the proofs of the main results.
3. The main results
3.1. Convexity of order
In this section we present a general distortion result for convex functions of order .
Theorem 3.1.
Let and . Then the following estimate hold:
where
These bounds are sharp. Equality holds for the function given by (5).
Proof.
Let . Then is of the form (1) and has the following form of the -th derivative:
(8) |
(9) |
Case 1: If , then
Case 2: If , then
where
is a factorial notation which depends only on , and
This result holds also for , so we obtain that
where
This completes the proof. ∎
Remark 3.2.
If , then is the class of convex functions on the unit disc and we obtain the upper bounds for the -th derivative in :
The same result can be found in [4, p. 118, Th. 9].
Remark 3.3.
Let and . If , then we obtain
for all . In particular,
(10) |
3.2. Starlikeness of order
In this section we present a general distortion result for starlike functions of order .
Theorem 3.4.
Let and . Then the following estimate hold:
(11) |
where
These bounds are sharp. Equality holds for the function given by (6).
Proof.
It is clear that is a subclass of class . From first section we know that every function from class has the following form of -th derivative
(12) |
Case 2: If , then
where
is a factorial notation which depends only on .
Next, we determine the sum of the series . In view of the ratio test (for details see [1]) we obtain that series converges when .
As in the case of the class we consider , where
is the general term of the above series,
and
It is easy to observe that , so we can consider a new general term for the above series, where
Hence,
In view of these computations, we obtain
This result holds also for , so we obtain that
where
This completes the proof. ∎
Remark 3.5.
If , then is the class of starlike functions on the unit disc and we obtain the upper bounds for the -th derivative in :
The same result can be found in [4, p. 117, Th. 8].
Remark 3.6.
Proof.
Remark 3.7.
Let and . Then
for all .
Remark 3.8.
4. Acknowledgments
The author thank the referee for his/her helpful comments and suggestions.
References
- [1] Cobzaş, Ş., Differential Calculus, Cluj University Press, 1997 (in romanian).
- [2] Duren, P.L., Univalent Functions, Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 1973.
- [3] Ghosh, N., Vasudevarao, Coefficient estimates for certain subclass of analytic functions defined by subordonation, Filomat, 31 (2017), no. 11, 3307–3318.
- [4] Goodman, A.W., Univalent Functions, Vols. I and II, Mariner Publ. Co., Tampa, Florida, 1983.
- [5] Graham, I., Kohr, G., Geometric function theory in one and higher dimensions, Marcel Deker Inc., New York, 2003.
- [6] Klein, M., Functions Starlike of order , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 131 (1968), no. 1, 99–106.
- [7] Kohr, G., Mocanu, P.T., Special Chapters of Complex Analysis, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2005 (in romanian).
- [8] Mocanu, P.T., Bulboacă, T., Sălăgean G.Ş., Geometric Theory of Univalent Functions, House of the Book of Science, Cluj-Napoca, 2006 (in romanian).
- [9] Pinchuk, B., On starlike and convex functions of order , Duke Math. J., 35 (1968), 721–734.
- [10] Robertson, M.S., On the theory of univalent functions, Ann. of Math. (2), 37 (1936), 374–408.
- [11] Schild, A., On starlike functions of order , Amer. J. Math., 87 (1965), 65–70.
Received June 11, 2017
Accepted September 5, 2017
“Babeş-Bolyai” University of Cluj-Napoca |
Department of Mathematics |
Cluj-Napoca, Romania |
E-mail: eduard.grigoriciuc@ubbcluj.ro |