Triangles inscribed in smooth closed arcs

(original), paper

Abstract

Authors

H. Kramer
Institutul de Calcul

A.B. Németh
Institutul de Calcul

Keywords

?

Paper coordinates

H. Kramer, A.B. Németh, Triangles inscribed in smooth closed arcs, Rev. Anal. Numér. Théorie Approximation (1972), 63–71.

PDF

About this paper

Journal

Rev. Anal. Numér. Théorie Approximation

Publisher Name

Academia Republicii S.R.

Print ISSN

1222-9024

Online ISSN

2457-8126

google scholar link

??

Paper (preprint) in HTML form

1972-Nemeth-Triangles inscribed in smooth closed arcs

TRIANGLES INSCRIBED IN SMOOTH CLOSED ARCS

by

HORST KRAMER and A. B. NEMETH

(Cluj)
Concerning a more general problem stated by p. TURAN (see in [2]), E. G. STRAUS has proved the following theorem (unpublished):
Given any continuum Σ ( = Σ ( = Sigma(=\Sigma(=Σ(= compact connected set ) ) ))) in the Euclidean plane R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2, such that for some triangle A B C A B C ABCA B CABC in the plane no three points A , B , C A , B , C A^('),B^('),C^(')A^{\prime}, B^{\prime}, C^{\prime}A,B,C in Σ Σ Sigma\SigmaΣ form a triangle similar to A B C A B C ABCA B CABC, then Σ Σ Sigma\SigmaΣ is a simple arc.
From this theorem in particular follows that if Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a closed arc, then there exists a triangle A B C A B C A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime}ABC similar to A B C A B C ABCA B CABC, which is inscribed in Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ in the sense that A , B , C Γ A , B , C Γ A^('),B^('),C^(')in GammaA^{\prime}, B^{\prime}, C^{\prime} \in \GammaA,B,CΓ.
We ask now about the existence of a triangle A B C A B C A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime}ABC inscribed in the closed arc Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ, which has parallel sides with the sides of the triangle A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and the same orientation. This special case appears in some problems in the geometry of convex sets (see our notes [1] and [2]). The answer in general may be negative. In our note we solve this problem in the special case when Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a closed arc of class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1 and has additional conditions about its tangent lines. From our theorem we derive a characterization of the strictly convex closed arcs of the class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1.
Le mm a 1. Let be Ω Ω Omega\OmegaΩ the strip formed by the points ( x , y ) ( x , y ) (x,y)(x, y)(x,y) of the Euclidean plane R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2 with a x b ( a < b ) a x b ( a < b ) a <= x <= b(a < b)a \leqq x \leqq b(a<b)axb(a<b). Denote by Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ two simple arcs of the class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1 in Ω Ω Omega\OmegaΩ, with disjoint interiors, having the parametric representations given by
Γ { x = φ ( t ) y = ψ ( t ) t [ 0 , 1 ] , and Γ { x = ξ ( t ) y = η ( t ) t [ 0 , 1 ] Γ x = φ ( t ) y = ψ ( t ) t [ 0 , 1 ] ,  and  Γ x = ξ t y = η t t [ 0 , 1 ] Gamma^('){[x=varphi(t^('))],[y=psi(t^('))]t^(')in[0,1]," and "Gamma^(''){[x=xi(t^(''))],[y=eta(t^(''))]t^('')in[0,1]:}\Gamma^{\prime}\left\{\begin{array} { l } { x = \varphi ( t ^ { \prime } ) } \\ { y = \psi ( t ^ { \prime } ) } \end{array} t ^ { \prime } \in [ 0 , 1 ] , \text { and } \Gamma ^ { \prime \prime } \left\{\begin{array}{l} x=\xi\left(t^{\prime \prime}\right) \\ y=\eta\left(t^{\prime \prime}\right) \end{array} t^{\prime \prime} \in[0,1]\right.\right.Γ{x=φ(t)y=ψ(t)t[0,1], and Γ{x=ξ(t)y=η(t)t[0,1]
and suppose that φ ( 0 ) = ξ ( 0 ) = a φ ( 0 ) = ξ ( 0 ) = a varphi(0)=xi(0)=a\varphi(0)=\xi(0)=aφ(0)=ξ(0)=a and φ ( 1 ) = ξ ( 1 ) = b φ ( 1 ) = ξ ( 1 ) = b varphi(1)=xi(1)=b\varphi(1)=\xi(1)=bφ(1)=ξ(1)=b. Suppose that Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ have a finite number of points in which the tangent is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy
and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line. Then:
(i) There exists a set of segments T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t)T(t)T(t) with the endpoints T ( t ) Γ T ( t ) Γ T^(')(t)inGamma^(')T^{\prime}(t) \in \Gamma^{\prime}T(t)Γ and T ( t ) Γ T ( t ) Γ T^('')(t)inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime}(t) \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}T(t)Γ, depending continuously on the parameter t [ 0 , 1 ] t [ 0 , 1 ] t in[0,1]t \in[0,1]t[0,1], such that for any t t ttt the segment is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy and T ( 0 ) = ( φ ( 0 ) , ψ ( 0 ) ) , T ( 1 ) == ( φ ( 1 ) , ψ ( 1 ) ) T ( 0 ) = ( φ ( 0 ) , ψ ( 0 ) ) , T ( 1 ) == ( φ ( 1 ) , ψ ( 1 ) ) T^(')(0)=(varphi(0),psi(0)),T^(')(1)==(varphi(1),psi(1))T^{\prime}(0)=(\varphi(0), \psi(0)), T^{\prime}(1)= =(\varphi(1), \psi(1))T(0)=(φ(0),ψ(0)),T(1)==(φ(1),ψ(1)) and T ( 0 ) = ( ξ ( 0 ) , η ( 0 ) ) , T ( 1 ) = ( ξ ( 1 ) , η ( 1 ) ) T ( 0 ) = ( ξ ( 0 ) , η ( 0 ) ) , T ( 1 ) = ( ξ ( 1 ) , η ( 1 ) ) T^('')(0)=(xi(0),eta(0)),T^('')(1)=(xi(1),eta(1))T^{\prime \prime}(0)=(\xi(0), \eta(0)), T^{\prime \prime}(1)=(\xi(1), \eta(1))T(0)=(ξ(0),η(0)),T(1)=(ξ(1),η(1)).
(ii) If T Γ T Γ T^(')inGamma^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}TΓ is arbitrary, then there exists a point T Γ T Γ T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}TΓ such that T = T ( t ) T = T ( t ) T^(')=T^(')(t)T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}(t)T=T(t) and T = T ( t ) T = T ( t ) T^('')=T^('')(t)T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}(t)T=T(t) for some t t ttt in [ 0 , 1 ] [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1][0,1][0,1].
(iii) There exist neighbourhoods U U U^(')U^{\prime}U and U U U^('')U^{\prime \prime}U of T ( 0 ) T ( 0 ) T^(')(0)T^{\prime}(0)T(0) and T ( 0 ) T ( 0 ) T^('')(0)T^{\prime \prime}(0)T(0), such that if T Γ U T Γ U T^(')inGamma^(')nnU^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime} \cap U^{\prime}TΓU and T Γ U T Γ U T^('')inGamma^('')nnU^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime} \cap U^{\prime \prime}TΓU and T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy, then there exists a t t ttt such that T = T ( t ) T = T ( t ) T^(')=T^(')(t)T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}(t)T=T(t) and T = T ( t ) T = T ( t ) T^('')=T^('')(t)T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}(t)T=T(t).
Proof. We proceed by induction on the number m m mmm of points of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ (different from their endpoints), in which the tangent is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy and in the neighbourhood of which the ares are on the same side of the tangent lines. (The number of these points is obviously even.)
Suppose that m = 0 m = 0 m=0m=0m=0. In this case the arcs Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ may be represented in the form
Γ : y = f ( x ) and Γ : y = g ( x ) . Γ : y = f ( x )  and  Γ : y = g ( x ) . Gamma^('):y=f(x)" and "Gamma^(''):y=g(x).\Gamma^{\prime}: y=f(x) \text { and } \Gamma^{\prime \prime}: y=g(x) .Γ:y=f(x) and Γ:y=g(x).
Then the set of segments T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t)T(t)T(t) where t = x a b a t = x a b a t=(x-a)/(b-a)t=\frac{x-a}{b-a}t=xaba and
T ( t ) = ( f ( t ( b a ) + a ) , t ( b a ) + a ) , T ( t ) = ( g ( t ( b a ) + a ) , t ( b a ) + a ) , T ( t ) = ( f ( t ( b a ) + a ) , t ( b a ) + a ) , T ( t ) = ( g ( t ( b a ) + a ) , t ( b a ) + a ) , T^(')(t)=(f(t(b-a)+a),t(b-a)+a),quadT^('')(t)=(g(t(b-a)+a),t(b-a)+a),T^{\prime}(t)=(f(t(b-a)+a), t(b-a)+a), \quad T^{\prime \prime}(t)=(g(t(b-a)+a), t(b-a)+a),T(t)=(f(t(ba)+a),t(ba)+a),T(t)=(g(t(ba)+a),t(ba)+a),
satisfies all the conditions of the lemma.
Suppose that the lemma holds for m 2 n m 2 n m <= 2nm \leq 2 nm2n and prove it for m = 2 ( n + 1 ) m = 2 ( n + 1 ) m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1).
Let be T k Γ T k Γ T_(k)^(')inGamma^(')T_{k}^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}TkΓ, the point in which the tangent is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy and has the minimal abscissa relative to all the points with this property in the interior of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ. Suppose that T k = ( φ ( t k ) , ψ ( t k ) ) T k = φ t k , ψ t k T_(k)^(')=(varphi(t_(k)^(')),psi(t_(k)^(')))T_{k}^{\prime}=\left(\varphi\left(t_{k}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{k}^{\prime}\right)\right)Tk=(φ(tk),ψ(tk)) and let be T i == ( φ ( t i ) , ψ ( t i ) ) , i = 1 , , k 1 T i == φ t i , ψ t i , i = 1 , , k 1 T_(i)^(')==(varphi(t_(i)^(')),psi(t_(i)^('))),i=1,dots,k rarr1T_{i}^{\prime}= =\left(\varphi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right)\right), i=1, \ldots, k \rightarrow 1Ti==(φ(ti),ψ(ti)),i=1,,k1 all the points with t i < t k t i < t k t_(i)^(') < t_(k)^(')t_{i}^{\prime}<t_{k}^{\prime}ti<tk, and with the property that the tangents to Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ are parallel to O y O y OyO yOy. Suppose that T i == ( φ ( t l ) , ψ ( t l ) ) , 1 l k 1 T i == φ t l , ψ t l , 1 l k 1 T_(i)^(')==(varphi(t_(l)^(')),psi(t_(l)^('))),1 <= l <= k-1T_{i}^{\prime}= =\left(\varphi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right)\right), 1 \leqq l \leqq k-1Ti==(φ(tl),ψ(tl)),1lk1 is a point with the maximal abscissa relative to the set of points T i , i = 1 , , k 1 T i , i = 1 , , k 1 T_(i)^('),i=1,dots,k-1T_{i}^{\prime}, i=1, \ldots, k-1Ti,i=1,,k1, (see Fig. 1). For i k i k i <= ki \leq kik we shall denote by t i t i t_(i)^('')t_{i}^{\prime \prime}ti the minimal value of t t t^('')t^{\prime \prime}t with the property that ξ ( t i ) = φ ( t i ) ξ t i = φ t i xi(t_(i)^(''))=varphi(t_(i)^('))\xi\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right)=\varphi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right)ξ(ti)=φ(ti). Put T i = ( ξ ( t i ) , η ( t i ) ) T i = ξ t i , η t i T_(i)^('')=(xi(t_(i)^('')),eta(t_(i)^('')))T_{i}^{\prime \prime}=\left(\xi\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right), \eta\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right)\right)Ti=(ξ(ti),η(ti)). Then the segments T i T i , i = 1 , , k T i T i , i = 1 , , k T_(i)^(')T_(i)^(''),i=1,dots,kT_{i}^{\prime} T_{i}^{\prime \prime}, i=1, \ldots, kTiTi,i=1,,k are parallel to Oy.
Consider now the strip a x φ ( t l ) a x φ t l a <= x <= varphi(t_(l)^('))a \leqq x \leqq \varphi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right)axφ(tl), and the part Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)^(')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime}Γ1 of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ for 0 ≦≤ t t i 0 ≦≤ t t i 0≦≤t^(') <= t_(i)^(')0 \leqq \leq t^{\prime} \leqq t_{i}^{\prime}0≦≤tti and the part Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime}Γ1 of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ for 0 t t l 0 t t l 0 <= t^('') <= t_(l)^('')0 \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq t_{l}^{\prime \prime}0ttl. The number of points on Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)^(')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime}Γ1 and Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime}Γ1 in which the tangents are parallel to O y O y OyO yOy is 2 n 2 n <= 2n\leq 2 n2n, because two such points, the point T k T k T_(k)^(')T_{k}^{\prime}Tk and T l T l T_(l)^(')T_{l}^{\prime}Tl, are eliminated ( T k T k T_(k)^(')T_{k}^{\prime}Tk is eliminated because t > t 1 t > t 1 t^(') > t_(1)^(')t^{\prime}>t_{1}^{\prime}t>t1 and then T Γ 1 T Γ 1 T^(')!inGamma_(1)^(')T^{\prime} \notin \Gamma_{1}^{\prime}TΓ1 and T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime}T1 is eliminated { } is bes T k > T l T k > T l T_(k) > T_(l)T_{k}>T_{l}Tk>Tl and T l T l T_(l)T_{l}Tl is eliminated because it is an endpoint of Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)\Gamma_{1}Γ1.) By the induction hypothesis there exists then the set of segments T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t)T(t)T(t) with the propeties (i), (ii) and (iii) with respect to the arcs Γ 1 arcs Γ 1 arcsGamma_(1)^(')\operatorname{arcs} \Gamma_{1}^{\prime}arcsΓ1 and Γ 1 Γ 1 Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime}Γ1.
By a similar way may be seen the existence of a set of segments T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t)T(t)T(t) with the properties (i), (ii) and (iii) for the parts Γ 2 Γ 2 Gamma_(2)^(')\Gamma_{2}^{\prime}Γ2 of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ for
Fig. 1.
t l t t k t l t t k t_(l)^(') <= t^(') <= t_(k)^(')t_{l}^{\prime} \leqq t^{\prime} \leqq t_{k}^{\prime}tlttk and Γ 2 Γ 2 Gamma_(2)^('')\Gamma_{2}^{\prime \prime}Γ2 of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ for t k t t l t k t t l t_(k)^('') <= t^('') <= t_(l)^('')t_{k}^{\prime \prime} \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq t_{l}^{\prime \prime}tkttl. (Here we have t k < t l t k < t l t_(k)^('') < t_(l)^(')t_{k}^{\prime \prime}<t_{l}^{\prime}tk<tl, from the definition of the points T k T k T_(k)^('')T_{k}^{\prime \prime}Tk and T l T l T_(l)^('')T_{l}^{\prime \prime}Tl, because ξ ( t k ) < ξ ( t l ) ξ t k < ξ t l xi(t_(k)^('')) < xi(t_(l)^(''))\xi\left(t_{k}^{\prime \prime}\right)<\xi\left(t_{l}^{\prime \prime}\right)ξ(tk)<ξ(tl).)
We may consider now the part Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ 3 Γ 3 Gamma_(3)^('')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime \prime}Γ3 of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ for t k t 1 t k t 1 t_(k)^(') <= t^(') <= 1t_{k}^{\prime} \leqq t^{\prime} \leqq 1tkt1 and t k t 1 t k t 1 t_(k)^('') <= t^('') <= 1t_{k}^{\prime \prime} \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq 1tkt1 respectively, and apply the induction hypothesis for Γ 3 Γ 3 Gamma_(3)^(')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime}Γ3 and Γ 3 Γ 3 Gamma_(3)^('')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime \prime}Γ3.
As a final step, by a simple joining of the obtained families of segments T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T ( t ) T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t)T(t)T(t) we obtain a family of segments which completes the proof of the assertion for m = 2 ( n + 1 ) m = 2 ( n + 1 ) m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1). This completes the proof of the lemma.
theorem 1. Let be ABC a triangle in the Euclidean plane R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2. Suppose that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a simple closed arc of class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1 in R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2, which has the property that for at least one of the sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC there is a finite number of points of Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ, in which the tangents are parallel to the respective side and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line. Then there exists a triangle A B C A B C A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime}ABC with sides parallel to sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and of the same orientation as A B C A B C ABCA B CABC, which is inscribed in Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ, in the sense that A A A^(')A^{\prime}A, B , C Γ B , C Γ B^('),C^(')in GammaB^{\prime}, C^{\prime} \in \GammaB,CΓ.
Proof. Suppose that B C B C BCB CBC is the side for which there are a finite number of points in which Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ has tangents parallel to B C B C BCB CBC and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line, and let B C B C BCB CBC be parallel to O y O y OyO yOy. Let be a a aaa and b , a < b b , a < b b,a < bb, a<bb,a<b the minimum, respective the maximum of abscissas of the points in which Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ has tangents parallel to O y O y OyO yOy. Denote by Δ Δ Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime}Δ and Δ Δ Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime}Δ the lines x = a x = a x=ax=ax=a, respectively x = b x = b x=bx=bx=b and let be P Δ Γ P Δ Γ P^(')inDelta^(')nn GammaP^{\prime} \in \Delta^{\prime} \cap \GammaPΔΓ and P Δ Γ P Δ Γ P^('')inDelta^('')nn GammaP^{\prime \prime} \in \Delta^{\prime \prime} \cap \GammaPΔΓ. The points P P P^(')P^{\prime}P and P P P^('')P^{\prime \prime}P divide the are Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ in two ares: Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ.
Consider now the triangle A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and let be D D DDD the foot of the perpendicular from A A AAA to the supporting line of B C B C BCB CBC. Then D = q B + ( 1 q ) C D = q B + ( 1 q ) C D=qB+(1-q)CD=q B+(1-q) CD=qB+(1q)C for a given number q q qqq. Denote by r r rrr the vector A D A D A-DA-DAD. Then A = D + r A = D + r A=D+rA=D+rA=D+r.
Let be T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT a segment parallel to B C B C BCB CBC. The triangle T T T T T T TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TTT having parallel sides with the sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and the same orientation, may be determined by putting
(1) T = q T + ( 1 q ) T + r | T T | | B C | . (1) T = q T + ( 1 q ) T + r T T | B C | . {:(1)T=qT^(')+(1-q)T^('')+r(|T^(')T^('')|)/(|BC|).:}\begin{equation*} T=q T^{\prime}+(1-q) T^{\prime \prime}+r \frac{\left|T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}\right|}{|B C|} . \tag{1} \end{equation*}(1)T=qT+(1q)T+r|TT||BC|.
We proceed now to construction of an arc γ γ gamma\gammaγ in the following way:
According to Lemma 1, the segment T ( 0 ) T ( 0 ) ( = P ) T ( 0 ) T ( 0 ) = P T^(')(0)T^('')(0)(=P^('))T^{\prime}(0) T^{\prime \prime}(0)\left(=P^{\prime}\right)T(0)T(0)(=P) can be moved continuously to T ( 1 ) T ( 1 ) ( = P ) T ( 1 ) T ( 1 ) = P T^(')(1)T^('')(1)(=P^(''))T^{\prime}(1) T^{\prime \prime}(1)\left(=P^{\prime \prime}\right)T(1)T(1)(=P) such that all the intermediate positions are segments T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT parallel to O y O y OyO yOy, and T Γ , T Γ T Γ , T Γ T^(')inGamma^('),T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}, T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}TΓ,TΓ. Consider this family of segments T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT depending continuously on the parameter t ∈∈ [ 0 , 1 ] t ∈∈ [ 0 , 1 ] t∈∈[0,1]t \in \in[0,1]t∈∈[0,1], i.e. suppose that the endpoints T T T^(')T^{\prime}T and T T T^('')T^{\prime \prime}T depends continuously on t t ttt. Then by (1), T T TTT depends continuously on t t ttt. Denote
γ = { T ( t ) : t [ 0 , 1 ] } . γ = { T ( t ) : t [ 0 , 1 ] } . gamma={T(t):t in[0,1]}.\gamma=\{T(t): t \in[0,1]\} .γ={T(t):t[0,1]}.
We have obviously γ ( 0 ) = T ( 0 ) = P γ ( 0 ) = T ( 0 ) = P gamma(0)=T(0)=P^(')\gamma(0)=T(0)=P^{\prime}γ(0)=T(0)=P and γ ( 1 ) = T ( 1 ) = P γ ( 1 ) = T ( 1 ) = P gamma(1)=T(1)=P^('')\gamma(1)=T(1)=P^{\prime \prime}γ(1)=T(1)=P.
According to the theorem of Jordan, Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ determines two domains of R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2, which we will call the "inside" and the „outside" of Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ. In what follows we shall prove that there exists a value t 0 t 0 t_(0)t_{0}t0 in ( 0 , 1 ) ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1)(0,1)(0,1) such that T ( t 0 ) T t 0 T(t_(0))T\left(t_{0}\right)T(t0) is inside and a value t 1 t 1 t_(1)t_{1}t1 in ( 0 , 1 ) ( 0 , 1 ) (0,1)(0,1)(0,1) such that T ( t 1 ) T t 1 T(t_(1))T\left(t_{1}\right)T(t1) is outside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ.
We observe that from the condition of the theorem it follows that P P P^(')P^{\prime}P is an isolated point with the property that the tangent to Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy. Let be T T T^(')T^{\prime}T a point on Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and let be T T T^('')T^{\prime \prime}T the point on Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ with minimal value of the parameter t t t^('')t^{\prime \prime}t such that T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT is parallel to O y O y OyO yOy. Let be T R T R T^('')R^(')T^{\prime \prime} R^{\prime}TR and T R T R T^(')R^('')T^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime}TR the segments parallel to C A C A CAC ACA and B A B A BAB ABA respectively. Letting T P T P T^(')rarrP^(')T^{\prime} \rightarrow P^{\prime}TP, the segment T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT tends to P P P^(')P^{\prime}P. From the property that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is of class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1, it follows that the parallel line in P P P^(')P^{\prime}P to B A B A BAB ABA will intersect Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ in a point. Denote by Q Q Q^('')Q^{\prime \prime}Q the nearest point to P P P^(')P^{\prime}P with this property. Then the open segment P Q P Q P^(')Q^('')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime \prime}PQ will be inside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ. Similarly, let P Q P Q P^(')Q^(')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime}PQ be the segment with the same property, parallel to C A C A CAC ACA. Let be T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime}T1 a point on Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and denote by T 1 T 1 T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime \prime}T1 the point on Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ with minimal value of the parameter t t t^('')t^{\prime \prime}t, such that T 1 T 1 T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(')T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime} T_{1}^{\prime \prime}T1T1 is parallel te O y O y OyO yOy. Suppose that the abscissa of T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(') <=T_{1}^{\prime} \leqqT1 minimum of the abscissas of Q Q Q^(')Q^{\prime}Q and Q Q Q^('')Q^{\prime \prime}Q. Then T 1 T 1 T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(')T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime} T_{1}^{\prime \prime}T1T1 will intersect P Q P Q P^(')Q^(')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime}PQ in R R R^(')R^{\prime}R and P Q P Q P^(')Q^('')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime \prime}PQ in R R R^('')R^{\prime \prime}R. Because Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a simple closed arc, for T 1 T 1 T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime}T1 sufficiently near
Fig. 2.
to P P P^(')P^{\prime}P the triangle R P R R P R R^(')P^(')R^('')R^{\prime} P^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime}RPR will be inside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ. Consider a point S S SSS inside this triangle and let T 0 T 0 T_(0)^(')T_{0}^{\prime}T0 be the intersection point of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ and the parallel line in S S SSS to B A B A BAB ABA having the minimal value of the parameter t t t^(')t^{\prime}t, and respectively, let T 0 T 0 T_(0)^('')T_{0}^{\prime \prime}T0 be the intersection of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ and the parallel line in S S SSS to C A C A CAC ACA, with the minimum value of the parameter t t t^('')t^{\prime \prime}t. Suppose that the abscissa of T 0 T 0 T_(0)^(') <=T_{0}^{\prime} \leqT0 than the abscissa of T 0 T 0 T_(0)^('')T_{0}^{\prime \prime}T0. Put T = T 0 T = T 0 T^(')=T_(0)^(')T^{\prime}=T_{0}^{\prime}T=T0 and denote by T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT the segment parallel to O y O y OyO yOy with T Γ T Γ T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}TΓ being the point with the minimal value of the parameter t t t^('')t^{\prime \prime}t with this property (see Fig. 2). T T T^('')T^{\prime \prime}T will be obviously ,,above" the line T 0 S T 0 S T_(0)^('')ST_{0}^{\prime \prime} ST0S, and therefore the point T T TTT defined by (1) will be inside the triangle R P R R P R R^(')P^(')R^('')R^{\prime} P^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime}RPR and therefore T T TTT is also inside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ. According (iii) in Lemma 1 it follows that for T T T^(')T^{\prime}T and T T T^('')T^{\prime \prime}T sufficiently near to P P P^(')P^{\prime}P, there exists a value t 0 t 0 t_(0)t_{0}t0 of the parameter t t ttt such that T = T ( t 0 ) , T = T ( t 0 ) T = T t 0 , T = T t 0 T^(')=T^(')(t_(0)),T^('')=T^('')(t_(0))T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}\left(t_{0}\right), T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}\left(t_{0}\right)T=T(t0),T=T(t0) and therefore T = T ( t 0 ) T = T t 0 T=T(t_(0))T=T\left(t_{0}\right)T=T(t0).
Denote by Δ Δ Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime}Δ and Δ Δ Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime}Δ the supporting lines of the convex hull Co ( Γ ) Co ( Γ ) Co(Gamma)\mathrm{Co}(\Gamma)Co(Γ) of Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ, parallel with B A B A BAB ABA and C A C A CAC ACA respectively, such that their intersection
fig. 4.
Fig. 3.
point U U UUU has the abscissa > b > b > b>b>b (see Fig. 3). Denote by U U U^(')U^{\prime}U the point of Γ Γ Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime}Γ on Δ Δ Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime}Δ nearest to U U UUU and by U U U^('')U^{\prime \prime}U the point of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ on Δ Δ Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime}Δ nearest to U U UUU. Suppose that the abscissa of U > U > U^(') >U^{\prime}>U> than the abscissa of U U U^('')U^{\prime \prime}U. Put U = T U = T U^(')=T^(')U^{\prime}=T^{\prime}U=T and let be T T T^('')T^{\prime \prime}T a point of Γ Γ Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}Γ such that T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT occurs in the construct a parameter t 1 t 1 t_(1)t_{1}t1 such that T T T^(')T^{\prime}T The point T = T ( t 1 ) T = T t 1 T=T(t_(1))T=T\left(t_{1}\right)T=T(t1) defined by (1) will T U T U T^(')UT^{\prime} UTU is outside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ (excepting T T T^(')T^{\prime}T ), T ( t ) T ( t ) T(t)T(t)T(t) on T U T U T^(')UT^{\prime} UTU, and be
(exceptiows that ( l 1 ) l 1 (l_(1))\left(l_{1}\right)(l1) will be outside Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ.
It fon. Denote by T T TTT an intersection point. Then from the definition of it will follow that there exist the points T Γ T Γ T^(')inGamma^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}TΓ and T Γ T Γ T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}TΓ such of the triangle T T T T T T TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TTT has the required property. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Remark. A special interest presents for us the case when Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ in Theorem 1 is a convex curve. Then an other proof may be given, which makes use of Brouwer's fixed point theorem. In this case our theorem follows from the more general Theorem 1 in the paper [1] (or [2]).
THEOREM 2. Let be ABC a triangle in the Euclidean plane R 2 R 2 R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}R2. Suppose that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a strictly convex, closed arc of class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1. Then there exists a single triangle A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 with sides parallel to sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and of the same orientation as A B C A B C ABCA B CABC, and which is inscribed in Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ, in the sense that A 1 , B 1 , C 1 Γ A 1 , B 1 , C 1 Γ A_(1),B_(1),C_(1)in GammaA_{1}, B_{1}, C_{1} \in \GammaA1,B1,C1Γ.
Proof. The existence of a triangle A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 with the required properties follows from the Theorem 1. It remains to show the unicity.
Suppose that A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 and A 2 B 2 C 2 A 2 B 2 C 2 A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2}A2B2C2 are two triangles with parallel sides and with the same orientation. Then one of their vertices is contained in the convex hull of the other five. Consider the supporting lines of A 1 B 1 A 1 B 1 A_(1)B_(1)A_{1} B_{1}A1B1 and A 2 B 2 A 2 B 2 A_(2)B_(2)A_{2} B_{2}A2B2. Because A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 and A 2 B 2 C 2 A 2 B 2 C 2 A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2}A2B2C2 have the same orientation, one of these lines, say A i B i ( i = 1 A i B i ( i = 1 A_(i)B_(i)(i=1A_{i} B_{i}(i=1AiBi(i=1 or 2 ) ) ))) determines a closed halfplane which contains both triangles. By the same reasoning there is a j j jjj and a k ( j = 1 k ( j = 1 k(j=1k(j=1k(j=1

or 2 and k = 1 k = 1 k=1k=1k=1 or 2 ) such that the supporting line of B j C j B j C j B_(j)C_(j)B_{j} C_{j}BjCj and the supporting line of C k A k C k A k C_(k)A_(k)C_{k} A_{k}CkAk have the same property. Then two indices of i , j , k i , j , k i,j,ki, j, ki,j,k coincides, say i = j = 1 i = j = 1 i=j=1i=j=1i=j=1 and one of the possible situations is that in Fig. 4. It follows that B 2 B 2 B_(2)B_{2}B2 is in the convex hull of the vertices A 1 , B 1 , C 1 , A 2 , C 2 A 1 , B 1 , C 1 , A 2 , C 2 A_(1),B_(1),C_(1),A_(2),C_(2)A_{1}, B_{1}, C_{1}, A_{2}, C_{2}A1,B1,C1,A2,C2. It is easy to see that in any other relative positions of A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 and A 2 B 2 C 2 A 2 B 2 C 2 A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2}A2B2C2 a similar conclusion holds.
If we suppose now that A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 and A 2 B 2 C 2 A 2 B 2 C 2 A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2}A2B2C2 are two triangles inscribed in F with sides parallel to the sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and having the same orientation, then we get a contradiction with the hypothesis that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is strictly convex.
theorem 3. If Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a simple closed arc of class C 1 C 1 C^(1)C^{1}C1 with the property that for any direction it has a finite number of tangents parallel to this direction, and for any triangle A B C A B C ABCA B CABC there exists a single triangle A 1 B 1 C 1 A 1 B 1 C 1 A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1}A1B1C1 inscribed in Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ having his sides parallel to the sides of A B C A B C ABCA B CABC and the same orientation as A B C A B C ABCA B CABC, then Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is a strictly convex arc.
Proof. Suppose that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ is not strictly convex. Then there exists a segment which intersects Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ in the points P 1 , P 2 P 1 , P 2 P_(1),P_(2)P_{1}, P_{2}P1,P2 and P 3 P 3 P_(3)P_{3}P3. Without loss of generality we may suppose that we have the situation in Fig. 5. Because P 1 , P 2 , P 3 P 1 , P 2 , P 3 P_(1),P_(2),P_(3)P_{1}, P_{2}, P_{3}P1,P2,P3 are isolated intersection points of Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ and P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3 (this follows from the hypothesis that Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ has a finite number of points in which the tangent P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3 ), we may suppose that P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3 is not tangent to to P P PPP is parallel P P PPP Then there exists a segment P , Q P , Q P,QP, QP,Q which is inside the I in the point P 1 P 1 P_(1)P_{1}P1. The segment P , P 2 P , P 2 P,P_(2)P, P_{2}P,P2 and 12 poin Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ die closed arc Ω Ω Omega\OmegaΩ formed by P R P R PRP RPR, 1 2 1 2 1_(2)1_{2}12. Γ Γ Gamma\GammaΓ from P 1 P 1 P_(1)P_{1}P1 to P 2 P 2 P_(2)P_{2}P2 (see Fig. 5). Let be P 2 R P 2 R P_(2)RP_{2} RP2R paral P 3 Q P 3 Q P_(3)QP_{3} QP3Q and R R RRR in the segment P 1 Q P 1 Q P_(1)QP_{1} QP1Q. Then R R RRR is inside the closed arc Ω Ω Omega\OmegaΩ. Denote now by P P PPP a farthest point from P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3 on Γ 6 Γ 6 Gamma_(6)\Gamma_{6}Γ6. Then the tangent line in P P PPP is parallel to P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3. Moving now segment T T T T T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TT continuously and parallel to P 1 P 3 P 1 P 3 P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}P1P3, from P 1 P 2 P 1 P 2 P_(1)P_(2)P_{1} P_{2}P1P2 to P P PPP (see Lemma 1), we may construct with the same procedure as in
the proof of Theorem 1 a triangle T T T T T T TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime}TTT with T , T , T T , T , T T,T^('),T^('')T, T^{\prime}, T^{\prime \prime}T,T,T on Γ 0 Γ 0 Gamma_(0)\Gamma_{0}Γ0 with the sides parallel to the sides of Q P 1 P 3 Q P 1 P 3 QP_(1)P_(3)Q P_{1} P_{3}QP1P3. This contradiction proves the theorem.

REIERENCES

[1] Kramer, H. si A. B. Né meth, Aplicarea teovenei de punct fix a lui Brourever in geometria corpuyilor conver Lucrările Colocviului de Geometrie și Topologie, Timişoara 1972.
[2] Kramer H., and A. B. Néneth, Equally spaced points for families of convex and compact sets in the Minkowski spaces. To appear.
Received, 14. V. 1972.
1972

Related Posts