Posts by Stefan Soltuz

Abstract

For \(T\) a direct pseudocontractive map, we prove the convergence of Mann iteration to the fixed point of \(T\). In this note we introduce a new class of maps. Let \(X\) be a real normed space, and \(B\subset X\) be a nonemepty set. The map \(T:B\rightarrow B\) is direct pseudocontractive if there exists \(k\in \left( 0,1\right)\) such that%

\[
\left \Vert T_{x}-T_{y}\right \Vert ^{2}\leq k\left \Vert x-y\right \Vert
^{2}+\left \Vert \left( I-T\right) x-\left( I-T\right) y\right \Vert
^{2},\forall x,y\in B.
\]

For \(T\) a direct pseudocontractive map , we prove the convergence of Mann iteration to the fixed point of \(T\).

Authors

S.M. Soltuz
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis

Keywords

pseudocontractive maps; fix ponts; iterative method; convergence

Paper coordinates

Ş.M. Şoltuz, Mann iteration for direct pseudocontractive maps, Bull. Stiint. Univ. Baia Mare, Ser. B, Fasc. Mat.-Inform., 17 (2001) nos. 1-2, 141-144.

PDF

About this paper

Journal

Scientific Bulletin of the University of Baia Mare, Series B, Mathematics-Informatics Fascicola

Publisher Name

University Baia Mare, Romania

DOI
Print ISSN
Online ISSN

3045-1833

google scholar link

??

Paper (preprint) in HTML form

2001-Soltuz-MC-Mann-iteration-b-

MANN ITERATION FOR DIRECT PSEUDOCONTRACTIVE MAPS

Ştefan M. ŞOLTUZ

Abstract

In this note we introduce a new class of maps. Let X X XXX be a real normed space, and B ⊂ X B ⊂ X B sub XB \subset XB⊂X be a nonempty set. The map T : B → B T : B → B T:B rarr BT: B \rightarrow BT:B→B is direct pseudocontractive if there exists k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) k in(0,1)k \in(0,1)k∈(0,1) such that

‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ||Tx-Ty||^(2) <= k||x-y||^(2)+||(I-T)x-(I-T)y||^(2),AA x,y in B.\|T x-T y\|^{2} \leq k\|x-y\|^{2}+\|(I-T) x-(I-T) y\|^{2}, \forall x, y \in B .‖Tx−Ty‖2≤k‖x−y‖2+‖(I−T)x−(I−T)y‖2,∀x,y∈B.
For T T TTT a direct pseudocontractive map, we prove the convergence of Mann iteration to the fixed point of T T TTT.
MSC. 47H10
Keywords: preudocontractive maps, fix points, iterative method, convergence
  1. Introduction. Let H H HHH be a real Hilbert space, let B ⊂ H B ⊂ H B sub HB \subset HB⊂H be a nonempty, convex set. Let T : B → B T : B → B T:B rarr BT: B \rightarrow BT:B→B be a map. Let x 1 ∈ B x 1 ∈ B x_(1)in Bx_{1} \in Bx1∈B, be an arbitrary fixed point. We consider the iteration
(1) x n + 1 = ( 1 − α n ) x n + α n T x n (1) x n + 1 = 1 − α n x n + α n T x n {:(1)x_(n+1)=(1-alpha_(n))x_(n)+alpha_(n)Tx_(n):}\begin{equation*} x_{n+1}=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) x_{n}+\alpha_{n} T x_{n} \tag{1} \end{equation*}(1)xn+1=(1−αn)xn+αnTxn
The sequence ( α n ) n ≥ 1 α n n ≥ 1 (alpha_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(αn)n≥1 satisfics: ( α n ) n ≥ 1 ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , ∑ n = 1 ∞ α n = ∞ α n n ≥ 1 ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , ∑ n = 1 ∞   α n = ∞ (alpha_(n))_(n >= 1)sub(0,1),sum_(n=1)^(oo)alpha_(n)=oo\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1} \subset(0,1), \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{n}=\infty(αn)n≥1⊂(0,1),∑n=1∞αn=∞, and ∑ n = 1 ∞ α n 2 < ∞ ∑ n = 1 ∞   α n 2 < ∞ sum_(n=1)^(oo)alpha_(n)^(2) < oo\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{n}^{2}< \infty∑n=1∞αn2<∞. The last relation implies that lim n → ∞ α n = 0 lim n → ∞   α n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)alpha_(n)=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \alpha_{n}=0limn→∞αn=0. A prototype for ( α n ) n ≥ 1 α n n ≥ 1 (alpha_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(αn)n≥1 is ( 1 / n ) n ≥ 1 ( 1 / n ) n ≥ 1 (1//n)_(n >= 1)(1 / n)_{n \geq 1}(1/n)n≥1.
Definition 1 The map T T TTT is called pseudocontractive if
‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ||Tx-Ty||^(2) <= ||x-y||^(2)+||(I-T)x-(I-T)y||^(2),AA x,y in B.\|T x-T y\|^{2} \leq\|x-y\|^{2}+\|(I-T) x-(I-T) y\|^{2}, \forall x, y \in B .‖Tx−Ty‖2≤‖x−y‖2+‖(I−T)x−(I−T)y‖2,∀x,y∈B.
In [7] we can see an example of a Lipechitz pseudocontractive map with a unique fixed point for which every non trivial Mann sequence fails to converge. The set B B BBB is nonempty, convex and compact.
Definition 2 The map T T TTT is called strongly pseudocontractive if there exists q ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) q ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) q in(0,1)q \in(0,1)q∈(0,1) such that
‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + q ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + q ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . ||Tx-Ty||^(2) <= ||x-y||^(2)+q||(I-T)x-(I-T)y||^(2),AA x,y in B.\|T x-T y\|^{2} \leq\|x-y\|^{2}+q\|(I-T) x-(I-T) y\|^{2}, \forall x, y \in B .‖Tx−Ty‖2≤‖x−y‖2+q‖(I−T)x−(I−T)y‖2,∀x,y∈B.
In [1], [2], [3], [5], [8], [11] the map T T TTT is considered strongly pseudocontractive. The sequence ( x n ) n ≥ 1 x n n ≥ 1 (x_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(x_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(xn)n≥1 given by (1) strongly converges to a fixed point of T T TTT.
We introduce the following class of maps:
Definition 3 The map T T TTT is called direct pseudocontractive if there exists k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) k in(0,1)k \in(0,1)k∈(0,1) such that
(2) ‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . (2) ‖ T x − T y ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x − y ‖ 2 + ‖ ( I − T ) x − ( I − T ) y ‖ 2 , ∀ x , y ∈ B . {:(2)||Tx-Ty||^(2) <= k||x-y||^(2)+||(I-T)x-(I-T)y||^(2)","AA x","y in B.:}\begin{equation*} \|T x-T y\|^{2} \leq k\|x-y\|^{2}+\|(I-T) x-(I-T) y\|^{2}, \forall x, y \in B . \tag{2} \end{equation*}(2)‖Tx−Ty‖2≤k‖x−y‖2+‖(I−T)x−(I−T)y‖2,∀x,y∈B.
The class of direct pseudocontractive maps is nonempty. If T T TTT is a contraction, then T T TTT is a direct pseudocontractive map.Picard -Banach Theorem can't be used to find the fixed point of a direct psendocontractive map. Instead, Mann iteration (1) can be successfully used. Our aim is to give a convergence result for (1). We denote by F ( T ) := { x ∈ B : T x = x } F ( T ) := { x ∈ B : T x = x } F(T):={x in B:Tx=x}F(T):=\{x \in B: T x=x\}F(T):={x∈B:Tx=x}.
Remark 1 If T T TTT is a direct pseudocontractive map and has F ( T ) ≠ ∅ F ( T ) ≠ ∅ F(T)!=O/F(T) \neq \emptysetF(T)≠∅, then T T TTT hass a unique fixed point.
Proof. Let x ∗ x ∗ x^(**)x^{*}x∗ and y ∗ y ∗ y^(**)y^{*}y∗ be two distinct fixed points. From (2) we have
‖ T x ∗ − T y ∗ ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x ∗ − y ∗ ‖ 2 ‖ x ∗ − y ∗ ‖ 2 ≤ k ‖ x ∗ − y ∗ ‖ 2 ( 1 − k ) ‖ x ∗ − y ∗ ‖ 2 ≤ 0 , k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) T x ∗ − T y ∗ 2 ≤ k x ∗ − y ∗ 2 x ∗ − y ∗ 2 ≤ k x ∗ − y ∗ 2 ( 1 − k ) x ∗ − y ∗ 2 ≤ 0 , k ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) {:[||Tx^(**)-Ty^(**)||^(2) <= k||x^(**)-y^(**)||^(2)],[||x^(**)-y^(**)||^(2) <= k||x^(**)-y^(**)||^(2)],[(1-k)||x^(**)-y^(**)||^(2) <= 0","k in(0","1)]:}\begin{aligned} \left\|T x^{*}-T y^{*}\right\|^{2} & \leq k\left\|x^{*}-y^{*}\right\|^{2} \\ \left\|x^{*}-y^{*}\right\|^{2} & \leq k\left\|x^{*}-y^{*}\right\|^{2} \\ (1-k)\left\|x^{*}-y^{*}\right\|^{2} & \leq 0, k \in(0,1) \end{aligned}‖Tx∗−Ty∗‖2≤k‖x∗−y∗‖2‖x∗−y∗‖2≤k‖x∗−y∗‖2(1−k)‖x∗−y∗‖2≤0,k∈(0,1)
Hence x ∗ = y ∗ x ∗ = y ∗ x^(**)=y^(**)x^{*}=y^{*}x∗=y∗. Thus F ( T ) = { x ∗ } F ( T ) = x ∗ F(T)={x^(**)}F(T)=\left\{x^{*}\right\}F(T)={x∗}.
The following lemma can be found in [10] as Lemma 4. Also, it can be found in [12] as Lemma 1.2, with an other proof. In [1] can be found as Lemma 2, the proof is similar to the proof of Lemma 1 from [8].
Lemma 4 [1], [10], [12] Let ( a n ) n ≥ 1 a n n ≥ 1 (a_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(a_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(an)n≥1 be a nonnegative sequence which verifies where a n + 1 ≤ ( 1 − λ n ) a n + σ n , ( λ n ) n ≥ 1 ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , ∑ n = 1 ∞ λ n = ∞ a n + 1 ≤ 1 − λ n a n + σ n , λ n n ≥ 1 ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , ∑ n = 1 ∞   λ n = ∞ a_(n+1) <= (1-lambda_(n))a_(n)+sigma_(n),(lambda_(n))_(n >= 1)sub(0,1),sum_(n=1)^(oo)lambda_(n)=ooa_{n+1} \leq\left(1-\lambda_{n}\right) a_{n}+\sigma_{n},\left(\lambda_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1} \subset(0,1), \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \lambda_{n}=\inftyan+1≤(1−λn)an+σn,(λn)n≥1⊂(0,1),∑n=1∞λn=∞ and σ n = o ( λ n ) σ n = o λ n sigma_(n)=o(lambda_(n))\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right)σn=o(λn). Then lim n − ∞ a n = 0 lim n − ∞   a n = 0 lim_(n-oo)a_(n)=0\lim _{n-\infty} a_{n}=0limn−∞an=0.
The following result is proved in [4].
Lemma 5 (4) Let H H HHH be a Hilbert space, the following relation is true for all x , y ∈ H x , y ∈ H x,y in Hx, y \in Hx,y∈H, and for all λ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) λ ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) lambda in(0,1)\lambda \in(0,1)λ∈(0,1) :
(3) ‖ ( 1 − λ ) x + λ y ‖ 2 = ( 1 − λ ) ‖ x ‖ 2 + λ ‖ y ‖ 2 − λ ( 1 − λ ) ‖ x = y ‖ 2 . (3) ‖ ( 1 − λ ) x + λ y ‖ 2 = ( 1 − λ ) ‖ x ‖ 2 + λ ‖ y ‖ 2 − λ ( 1 − λ ) ‖ x = y ‖ 2 . {:(3)||(1-lambda)x+lambda y||^(2)=(1-lambda)||x||^(2)+lambda||y||^(2)-lambda(1-lambda)||x=y||^(2).:}\begin{equation*} \|(1-\lambda) x+\lambda y\|^{2}=(1-\lambda)\|x\|^{2}+\lambda\|y\|^{2}-\lambda(1-\lambda)\|x=y\|^{2} . \tag{3} \end{equation*}(3)‖(1−λ)x+λy‖2=(1−λ)‖x‖2+λ‖y‖2−λ(1−λ)‖x=y‖2.
2.The main result.
We are able now to give the main result:
Theorem 6 Let H H HHH be a real Hilbert space, let B ⊂ H B ⊂ H B sub HB \subset HB⊂H be a nonempty, convex, bounded and closed set and let T : B → B T : B → B T:B rarr BT: B \rightarrow BT:B→B be a continuous, direct pseudocontructive map, with F ( T ) ≠ ∅ F ( T ) ≠ ∅ F(T)!=O/F(T) \neq \emptysetF(T)≠∅. Then for each x 1 x 1 x_(1)x_{1}x1 a fixed point in B B BBB, the sequence ( x n ) n ≥ 1 x n n ≥ 1 (x_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(x_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(xn)n≥1 given by (1) converges strongly to the unique fixed point of T T TTT.
Proof. Let x ∗ ∈ F ( T ) x ∗ ∈ F ( T ) x^(**)in F(T)x^{*} \in F(T)x∗∈F(T). From remark 2 we know that F ( T ) = { x ∗ } F ( T ) = x ∗ F(T)={x^(**)}F(T)=\left\{x^{*}\right\}F(T)={x∗}. Using (2) and (3) we get
‖ x n + 1 − x ∗ ‖ 2 = ‖ ( 1 − α n ) x n + α n T x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 = ‖ ( 1 − α n ) ( x n − x ∗ ) + α n ( T x n − x ∗ ) ‖ 2 = ( 1 − α n ) ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 + α n ‖ T x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 − α n ( 1 − α n ) ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 ≤ ( 1 − α n ) ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 + α n k ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 + + α n ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 − α n ( 1 − α n ) ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 ≤ [ 1 − ( 1 − k ) α n ] ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 + α n 2 ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 . x n + 1 − x ∗ 2 = 1 − α n x n + α n T x n − x ∗ 2 = 1 − α n x n − x ∗ + α n T x n − x ∗ 2 = 1 − α n x n − x ∗ 2 + α n T x n − x ∗ 2 − α n 1 − α n T x n − x n 2 ≤ 1 − α n x n − x ∗ 2 + α n k x n − x ∗ 2 + + α n T x n − x n 2 − α n 1 − α n T x n − x n 2 ≤ 1 − ( 1 − k ) α n x n − x ∗ 2 + α n 2 T x n − x n 2 . {:[||x_(n+1)-x^(**)||^(2)],[=||(1-alpha_(n))x_(n)+alpha_(n)Tx_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)],[=||(1-alpha_(n))(x_(n)-x^(**))+alpha_(n)(Tx_(n)-x^(**))||^(2)],[=(1-alpha_(n))||x_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)+alpha_(n)||Tx_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)-alpha_(n)(1-alpha_(n))||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2)],[ <= (1-alpha_(n))||x_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)+alpha_(n)k||x_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)+],[+alpha_(n)||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2)-alpha_(n)(1-alpha_(n))||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2)],[ <= [1-(1-k)alpha_(n)]||x_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)+alpha_(n)^(2)||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2).]:}\begin{aligned} & \left\|x_{n+1}-x^{*}\right\|^{2} \\ = & \left\|\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) x_{n}+\alpha_{n} T x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2} \\ = & \left\|\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left(x_{n}-x^{*}\right)+\alpha_{n}\left(T x_{n}-x^{*}\right)\right\|^{2} \\ = & \left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}+\alpha_{n}\left\|T x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}-\alpha_{n}\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2} \\ \leq & \left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}+\alpha_{n} k\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}+ \\ & +\alpha_{n}\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2}-\alpha_{n}\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2} \\ \leq & {\left[1-(1-k) \alpha_{n}\right]\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}+\alpha_{n}^{2}\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2} . } \end{aligned}‖xn+1−x∗‖2=‖(1−αn)xn+αnTxn−x∗‖2=‖(1−αn)(xn−x∗)+αn(Txn−x∗)‖2=(1−αn)‖xn−x∗‖2+αn‖Txn−x∗‖2−αn(1−αn)‖Txn−xn‖2≤(1−αn)‖xn−x∗‖2+αnk‖xn−x∗‖2++αn‖Txn−xn‖2−αn(1−αn)‖Txn−xn‖2≤[1−(1−k)αn]‖xn−x∗‖2+αn2‖Txn−xn‖2.
The sequence ( ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 ) n ≥ 1 T x n − x n 2 n ≥ 1 (||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2))_(n >= 1)\left(\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2}\right)_{n \geq 1}(‖Txn−xn‖2)n≥1 is bounded, because B B BBB is bounded. There exists M > 0 M > 0 M > 0M>0M>0 such that ‖ T x n − x n ‖ 2 < M T x n − x n 2 < M ||Tx_(n)-x_(n)||^(2) < M\left\|T x_{n}-x_{n}\right\|^{2}<M‖Txn−xn‖2<M, for all n ≥ 1 n ≥ 1 n >= 1n \geq 1n≥1. We denote a n := ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ 2 a n := x n − x ∗ 2 a_(n):=||x_(n)-x^(**)||^(2)a_{n}:= \left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|^{2}an:=‖xn−x∗‖2, and we get:
a n + 1 ≤ [ 1 − ( 1 − k ) α n ] a n + α n 2 M . a n + 1 ≤ 1 − ( 1 − k ) α n a n + α n 2 M . a_(n+1) <= [1-(1-k)alpha_(n)]a_(n)+alpha_(n)^(2)M.a_{n+1} \leq\left[1-(1-k) \alpha_{n}\right] a_{n}+\alpha_{n}^{2} M .an+1≤[1−(1−k)αn]an+αn2M.
Let us denote by
λ n := ( 1 − k ) α n σ n := α n 2 M . λ n := ( 1 − k ) α n σ n := α n 2 M . {:[lambda_(n):=(1-k)alpha_(n)],[sigma_(n):=alpha_(n)^(2)M.]:}\begin{aligned} & \lambda_{n}:=(1-k) \alpha_{n} \\ & \sigma_{n}:=\alpha_{n}^{2} M . \end{aligned}λn:=(1−k)αnσn:=αn2M.
Observe that λ n = ( 1 − k ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) λ n = ( 1 − k ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) lambda_(n)=(1-k)alpha_(n)sub(0,1)\lambda_{n}=(1-k) \alpha_{n} \subset(0,1)λn=(1−k)αn⊂(0,1), for all n ≥ 1 n ≥ 1 n >= 1n \geq 1n≥1. We have ∑ n − 1 ∞ λ n = ( 1 − k ) ∑ n = 1 ∞ α n = ∞ ∑ n − 1 ∞   λ n = ( 1 − k ) ∑ n = 1 ∞   α n = ∞ sum_(n-1)^(oo)lambda_(n)=(1-k)sum_(n=1)^(oo)alpha_(n)=oo\sum_{n-1}^{\infty} \lambda_{n}= (1-k) \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{n}=\infty∑n−1∞λn=(1−k)∑n=1∞αn=∞. The following relation is true
lim n → ∞ σ n λ n = lim n → ∞ α s 2 M ( 1 − k ) α n = M 1 − k lim n → ∞ α n = 0 lim n → ∞   σ n λ n = lim n → ∞   α s 2 M ( 1 − k ) α n = M 1 − k lim n → ∞   α n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)(sigma_(n))/(lambda_(n))=lim_(n rarr oo)(alpha_(s)^(2)M)/((1-k)alpha_(n))=(M)/(1-k)lim_(n rarr oo)alpha_(n)=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\sigma_{n}}{\lambda_{n}}=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{\alpha_{s}^{2} M}{(1-k) \alpha_{n}}=\frac{M}{1-k} \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \alpha_{n}=0limn→∞σnλn=limn→∞αs2M(1−k)αn=M1−klimn→∞αn=0
Thus, we have σ n = o ( λ n ) σ n = o λ n sigma_(n)=o(lambda_(n))\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right)σn=o(λn). From Lemma 1 we get lim n → ∞ a n = 0 lim n → ∞   a n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)a_(n)=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} a_{n}=0limn→∞an=0. Hence lim n → ∞ ‖ x n − x ∗ ‖ = 0 lim n → ∞   x n − x ∗ = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)||x_(n)-x^(**)||=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|=0limn→∞‖xn−x∗‖=0. The proof is complete.
Using the Schauder fixed point theorem we give the following corollary:
Corollary 7 Let H H HHH be a real Hilbert space, let B ⊂ H B ⊂ H B sub HB \subset HB⊂H be a nonempty, convex, compact set and let T : B → B T : B → B T:B rarr BT: B \rightarrow BT:B→B be a continuous, direct pseudocontractive map. Then for exach x 1 x 1 x_(1)x_{1}x1 a fixed point in B B BBB, the sequence ( x n ) n ≥ 1 x n n ≥ 1 (x_(n))_(n >= 1)\left(x_{n}\right)_{n \geq 1}(xn)n≥1 given by (1) converges strongly to the unique fixed poinl of T T TTT.

References

[1] S.S.Chang, Y.J. Cho, B.S. Lee, J.S. Jung, S. M. Kang, Iterative Approximations of Fixed Points and Solutions for Strongly Accretive and Strongly Pseudo-contractive Mappings in Banach Spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 224 (1998), 149-165.
[2] C. E. Chidume, Approximation of Fixed Points of Strongly Pseudocontractive Mappings, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 120 (1994), 546-551.
[3] C. E. Chidume, C. Moore, Fixed Point Iteration for Strongly Pseudocontractive Maps, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), 1163-1170.
[4] S. Ishikawa, Fized Points by a New Iteration Method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1974), 147-150.
[5] G. G. Johnson, Fixed Points by Mean value iterations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (1972), 193-195.
[6] R. W. Mann, Mean Value Methods in Iteration, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953), 504-510.
[7] S.A. Mutangadura, C.E. Chidume, An Example of the Mann Iteration Method for Lipschitz Pseudocontractions, internal report ICTP Trieste (2000), http://www.ictp.trieste.it
[8] J. A. Park, Mann-Ileration for Strictly Pseudocontructive Maps, J. Korean Math. Soc. 31 (1994), 333-337.
[9] R. U. Verma, A Ficed Point Theorem Involving Lipschitzian Generalized Pseudo-contractions, Proc. Royal Irish Acad. 97A (1997), 83-86.
[10] X. Weng, Pired Point Iteration for Local Strictly Pseudocontractive Mapping, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1991), 727-731.
[11] II. Y. Zhou, Stable Iteration Procedures for Strong Pseudocontractions and Nonlinear Equations Involving Accretive Operators without Lipschitz Assumption, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 230 (1999), 1-30.
[12] H. Zhou, J. Yuting, Approximation of Fixed Points of Strongly Pseudocontractive Maps without Lipschitz Assumption, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
125 (1997), 1705-1709.
Received: 12.03.2001
"T. Popoviciu" Institute of
Numerical Analysis
Gh. Bilascu 37, P.O. Box 68-1,
3400 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Related Posts