Posts by Stefan Soltuz

Abstract

We show that T-stability of Mann and Ishikawa iterations are equivalent.

    Authors

    B.E. Rhoades

    S.M. Soltuz
    (Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis, Romanian Academy)

    Keywords

    Mann iteration; Ishikawa iteration; T-stability

    References

    See the expanding block below.

    Paper coordinates

    B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M . Şoltuz, The equivalence between T-stabilities of Mann and Ishikawa iterations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 318 (2006), 472-475.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.05.066

    PDF

    About this paper

    Publisher Name

    Elsevier

    Print ISSN

    0022-247X

    Online ISSN
    Google Scholar Profile

    google scholar

    soon

    Paper (preprint) in HTML form

    1-s2.0-S0022247X05005202-main

    The equivalence between the T T TTT-stabilities of Mann and Ishikawa iterations

    B.E. Rhoades a a  ^("a "){ }^{\text {a }}a , Ştefan M. Şoltuz b, b,  ^("b, "){ }^{\text {b, }}b,  t a a ^(a){ }^{\mathrm{a}}a Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405-7106, USA b b ^(b){ }^{\mathrm{b}}b "T. Popoviciu" Institute of Numerical Analysis, PO Box 68-1, 400110 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

    Received 16 January 2005
    Available online 11 July 2005
    Submitted by G. Jungck

    Abstract

    We show that T T TTT-stability of Mann and Ishikawa iterations are equivalent. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Mann iteration; Ishikawa iteration; T T TTT-stability

    1. Introduction

    Let X X XXX be a normed space and T T TTT a selfmap of X X XXX. Let x 0 x 0 x_(0)x_{0}x0 be a point of X X XXX, and assume that x n + 1 = f ( T , x n ) x n + 1 = f T , x n x_(n+1)=f(T,x_(n))x_{n+1}=f\left(T, x_{n}\right)xn+1=f(T,xn) is an iteration procedure, involving T T TTT, which yields a sequence { x n } x n {x_(n)}\left\{x_{n}\right\}{xn} of point from X X XXX. Suppose { x n } x n {x_(n)}\left\{x_{n}\right\}{xn} converges to a fixed point x ∗ x ∗ x^(**)x^{*}x∗ of T T TTT. Let { ξ n } ξ n {xi_(n)}\left\{\xi_{n}\right\}{ξn} be an arbitrary sequence in X X XXX, and set ϵ n = ‖ ξ n + 1 − f ( T , ξ n ) ‖ ϵ n = ξ n + 1 − f T , ξ n epsilon_(n)=||xi_(n+1)-f(T,xi_(n))||\epsilon_{n}=\left\|\xi_{n+1}-f\left(T, \xi_{n}\right)\right\|ϵn=‖ξn+1−f(T,ξn)‖ for all n ∈ N n ∈ N n inNn \in \mathbb{N}n∈N.
    Definition 1.1. [2] If ( ( lim n → ∞ ϵ n = 0 ) ⇒ ( lim n → ∞ ξ n = p ) ) lim n → ∞   ϵ n = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞   ξ n = p ((lim_(n rarr oo)epsilon_(n)=0)=>(lim_(n rarr oo)xi_(n)=p))\left(\left(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \epsilon_{n}=0\right) \Rightarrow\left(\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \xi_{n}=p\right)\right)((limn→∞ϵn=0)⇒(limn→∞ξn=p)), then the iteration procedure x n + 1 = f ( T , x n ) x n + 1 = f T , x n x_(n+1)=f(T,x_(n))x_{n+1}=f\left(T, x_{n}\right)xn+1=f(T,xn) is said to be T T TTT-stable with respect to T T TTT.
    Remark 1.2. [2] In practice, such a sequence { ξ n } ξ n {xi_(n)}\left\{\xi_{n}\right\}{ξn} could arise in the following way. Let x 0 x 0 x_(0)x_{0}x0 be a point in X X XXX. Set x n + 1 = f ( T , x n ) x n + 1 = f T , x n x_(n+1)=f(T,x_(n))x_{n+1}=f\left(T, x_{n}\right)xn+1=f(T,xn). Let ξ 0 = x 0 ξ 0 = x 0 xi_(0)=x_(0)\xi_{0}=x_{0}ξ0=x0. Now x 1 = f ( T , x 0 ) x 1 = f T , x 0 x_(1)=f(T,x_(0))x_{1}=f\left(T, x_{0}\right)x1=f(T,x0). Because of rounding or discretization in the function T T TTT, a new value ξ 1 ξ 1 xi_(1)\xi_{1}ξ1 approximately equal to x 1 x 1 x_(1)x_{1}x1 might be obtained instead of the true value of f ( T , x 0 ) f T , x 0 f(T,x_(0))f\left(T, x_{0}\right)f(T,x0). Then to approximate ξ 2 ξ 2 xi_(2)\xi_{2}ξ2, the value f ( T , ξ 1 ) f T , ξ 1 f(T,xi_(1))f\left(T, \xi_{1}\right)f(T,ξ1) is computed to yields ξ 2 ξ 2 xi_(2)\xi_{2}ξ2, an approximation of f ( T , ξ 1 ) f T , ξ 1 f(T,xi_(1))f\left(T, \xi_{1}\right)f(T,ξ1). This computation is continued to obtain { ξ n } ξ n {xi_(n)}\left\{\xi_{n}\right\}{ξn} an approximate sequence of { x n } x n {x_(n)}\left\{x_{n}\right\}{xn}.
    The two most popular iteration procedures for obtaining fixed points of T T TTT, when the Banach principle fails, are Mann iteration [3], defined by
    (1.1) u n + 1 = ( 1 − α n ) u n + α n T u n , (1.1) u n + 1 = 1 − α n u n + α n T u n , {:(1.1)u_(n+1)=(1-alpha_(n))u_(n)+alpha_(n)Tu_(n)",":}\begin{equation*} u_{n+1}=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) u_{n}+\alpha_{n} T u_{n}, \tag{1.1} \end{equation*}(1.1)un+1=(1−αn)un+αnTun,
    and Ishikawa iteration [1], defined by
    x n + 1 = ( 1 − α n ) x n + α n T z n (1.2) z n = ( 1 − β n ) x n + β n T x n x n + 1 = 1 − α n x n + α n T z n (1.2) z n = 1 − β n x n + β n T x n {:[x_(n+1)=(1-alpha_(n))x_(n)+alpha_(n)Tz_(n)],[(1.2)z_(n)=(1-beta_(n))x_(n)+beta_(n)Tx_(n)]:}\begin{align*} & x_{n+1}=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) x_{n}+\alpha_{n} T z_{n} \\ & z_{n}=\left(1-\beta_{n}\right) x_{n}+\beta_{n} T x_{n} \tag{1.2} \end{align*}xn+1=(1−αn)xn+αnTzn(1.2)zn=(1−βn)xn+βnTxn
    The sequences { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , { β n } ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1),{beta_(n)}sub[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\} \subset[0,1){αn}⊂(0,1),{βn}⊂[0,1) satisfy
    (1.3) lim n → ∞ α n = lim n → ∞ β n = 0 , ∑ n = 1 ∞ α n = ∞ (1.3) lim n → ∞   α n = lim n → ∞   β n = 0 , ∑ n = 1 ∞   α n = ∞ {:(1.3)lim_(n rarr oo)alpha_(n)=lim_(n rarr oo)beta_(n)=0","quadsum_(n=1)^(oo)alpha_(n)=oo:}\begin{equation*} \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \alpha_{n}=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \beta_{n}=0, \quad \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_{n}=\infty \tag{1.3} \end{equation*}(1.3)limn→∞αn=limn→∞βn=0,∑n=1∞αn=∞
    A reasonable conjecture is that the Ishikawa iteration and the corresponding Mann iteration are equivalent for all maps for which either method provides convergence to a fixed point. In an attempt to verify this conjecture the authors, in a series of papers [4-9] have shown the equivalence for several classes of maps. We shall prove the equivalence between T T TTT-stabilities of (1.1) and (1.2). Throughout this paper, we shall assume that both Mann and Ishikawa iterations converge to a fixed point of T T TTT.

    2. The equivalence between T T T\boldsymbol{T}T-stabilities

    Let { x n } x n {x_(n)}\left\{x_{n}\right\}{xn} be the Ishikawa iteration and { u n } u n {u_(n)}\left\{u_{n}\right\}{un} be the Mann iteration. Let { s n } , { p n } ⊂ X s n , p n ⊂ X {s_(n)},{p_(n)}sub X\left\{s_{n}\right\},\left\{p_{n}\right\} \subset X{sn},{pn}⊂X be such that s 0 = p 0 s 0 = p 0 s_(0)=p_(0)s_{0}=p_{0}s0=p0, and let ( α n ) n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , ( β n ) n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) (alpha_(n))_(n)sub(0,1),(beta_(n))_(n)sub[0,1)\left(\alpha_{n}\right)_{n} \subset(0,1),\left(\beta_{n}\right)_{n} \subset[0,1)(αn)n⊂(0,1),(βn)n⊂[0,1) satisfy (1.3) and
    (2.1) y n = ( 1 − β n ) s n + β n T s n (2.1) y n = 1 − β n s n + β n T s n {:(2.1)y_(n)=(1-beta_(n))s_(n)+beta_(n)Ts_(n):}\begin{equation*} y_{n}=\left(1-\beta_{n}\right) s_{n}+\beta_{n} T s_{n} \tag{2.1} \end{equation*}(2.1)yn=(1−βn)sn+βnTsn
    We consider the following nonnegative sequences, for all n ∈ N n ∈ N n inNn \in \mathbb{N}n∈N :
    (2.2) ε n := ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T y n ‖ (2.3) δ n := ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T p n ‖ . (2.2) ε n := s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T y n (2.3) δ n := p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T p n . {:[(2.2)epsi_(n):=||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||],[(2.3)delta_(n):=||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Tp_(n)||.]:}\begin{align*} & \varepsilon_{n}:=\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\| \tag{2.2}\\ & \delta_{n}:=\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T p_{n}\right\| . \tag{2.3} \end{align*}(2.2)εn:=‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTyn‖(2.3)δn:=‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTpn‖.
    Definition 2.1. Definition 1.1 for (2.2) and (2.3) gives:
    (i) If lim n → ∞ ε n = 0 lim n → ∞   ε n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)epsi_(n)=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \varepsilon_{n}=0limn→∞εn=0 implies that lim n → ∞ s n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   s n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)s_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} s_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞sn=x∗, then the Ishikawa iteration (1.2), is said to be T T TTT-stable.
    (ii) If lim n → ∞ δ n = 0 lim n → ∞   δ n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)delta_(n)=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \delta_{n}=0limn→∞δn=0 implies that lim n → ∞ p n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   p n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)p_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} p_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞pn=x∗, then the Mann iteration (1.1) is said to be T T TTT-stable.
    Remark 2.2. Let X X XXX be a normed space and T : X → X T : X → X T:X rarr XT: X \rightarrow XT:X→X a map. The following are equivalent:
    (i) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , { β n } ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1),{beta_(n)}sub[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\} \subset[0,1){αn}⊂(0,1),{βn}⊂[0,1) satisfying (1.3), the Ishikawa iteration is T T TTT-stable,
    (I) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , { β n } ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1),{beta_(n)}sub[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\} \subset[0,1){αn}⊂(0,1),{βn}⊂[0,1) satisfying (1.3), ∀ { s n } ⊂ X ∀ s n ⊂ X AA{s_(n)}sub X\forall\left\{s_{n}\right\} \subset X∀{sn}⊂X :
    (2.4) lim n → ∞ ε n = lim n → ∞ ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T y n ‖ = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞ s n = x ∗ (2.4) lim n → ∞   ε n = lim n → ∞   s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T y n = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞   s n = x ∗ {:(2.4)lim_(n rarr oo)epsi_(n)=lim_(n rarr oo)||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||=0=>lim_(n rarr oo)s_(n)=x^(**):}\begin{equation*} \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \varepsilon_{n}=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|=0 \Rightarrow \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} s_{n}=x^{*} \tag{2.4} \end{equation*}(2.4)limn→∞εn=limn→∞‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTyn‖=0⇒limn→∞sn=x∗
    Remark 2.3. Let X X XXX be a normed space and T : X → X T : X → X T:X rarr XT: X \rightarrow XT:X→X a map. The following are equivalent:
    (ii) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1){αn}⊂(0,1) satisfying (1.3), the Mann iteration is T T TTT-stable,
    (II) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1){αn}⊂(0,1) satisfying (1.3), ∀ { p n } ⊂ X ∀ p n ⊂ X AA{p_(n)}sub X\forall\left\{p_{n}\right\} \subset X∀{pn}⊂X :
    (2.5) lim n → ∞ δ n = lim n → ∞ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T p n ‖ = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞ p n = x ∗ (2.5) lim n → ∞   δ n = lim n → ∞   p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T p n = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞   p n = x ∗ {:(2.5)lim_(n rarr oo)delta_(n)=lim_(n rarr oo)||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Tp_(n)||=0quad=>quadlim_(n rarr oo)p_(n)=x^(**):}\begin{equation*} \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} \delta_{n}=\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T p_{n}\right\|=0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} p_{n}=x^{*} \tag{2.5} \end{equation*}(2.5)limn→∞δn=limn→∞‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTpn‖=0⇒limn→∞pn=x∗
    Theorem 2.4. Let X X XXX be a normed space and T : X → X T : X → X T:X rarr XT: X \rightarrow XT:X→X a map. Then the following are equivalent:
    (i) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , { β n } ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1),{beta_(n)}sub[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\} \subset[0,1){αn}⊂(0,1),{βn}⊂[0,1) satisfying (1.3), the Ishikawa iteration (1.2) is T T TTT-stable,
    (ii) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1){αn}⊂(0,1), satisfying (1.3), the Mann iteration (1.1) is T T TTT-stable.
    Proof. Let
    M := max { sup n ∈ N { ‖ T ( y n ) ‖ } , sup n ∈ N { ‖ T ( s n ) ‖ } , sup n ∈ N { ‖ T ( p n ) ‖ } } M := max sup n ∈ N   T y n , sup n ∈ N   T s n , sup n ∈ N   T p n M:=max{s u p_(n inN){||T(y_(n))||},s u p_(n inN){||T(s_(n))||},s u p_(n inN){||T(p_(n))||}}M:=\max \left\{\sup _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left\{\left\|T\left(y_{n}\right)\right\|\right\}, \sup _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left\{\left\|T\left(s_{n}\right)\right\|\right\}, \sup _{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left\{\left\|T\left(p_{n}\right)\right\|\right\}\right\}M:=max{supn∈N{‖T(yn)‖},supn∈N{‖T(sn)‖},supn∈N{‖T(pn)‖}}
    Since the Mann and Ishikawa iterations converge, M < ∞ M < ∞ M < ooM<\inftyM<∞. Remarks 2.2 and 2.3 assure that (i) ⇔ (ii) is equivalent to (I) ⇔ (II). We shall prove that (I) ⇒ (II). In (I) and (2.4) set s n := p n s n := p n s_(n):=p_(n)s_{n}:=p_{n}sn:=pn to obtain
    ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T p n ‖ ⩽ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T y n ‖ + ‖ α n T y n − α n T p n ‖ ⩽ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T y n ‖ + α n ( ‖ T y n ‖ + ‖ T p n ‖ ) (2.6) ⩽ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T y n ‖ + 2 α n M → 0 as n → ∞ . p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T p n ⩽ p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T y n + α n T y n − α n T p n ⩽ p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T y n + α n T y n + T p n (2.6) ⩽ p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T y n + 2 α n M → 0  as  n → ∞ . {:[||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Tp_(n)||],[quad <= ||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||+||alpha_(n)Ty_(n)-alpha_(n)Tp_(n)||],[quad <= ||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||+alpha_(n)(||Ty_(n)||+||Tp_(n)||)],[(2.6)quad <= ||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||+2alpha_(n)M rarr0quad" as "n rarr oo.]:}\begin{align*} & \left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T p_{n}\right\| \\ & \quad \leqslant\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|+\left\|\alpha_{n} T y_{n}-\alpha_{n} T p_{n}\right\| \\ & \quad \leqslant\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\left(\left\|T y_{n}\right\|+\left\|T p_{n}\right\|\right) \\ & \quad \leqslant\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|+2 \alpha_{n} M \rightarrow 0 \quad \text { as } n \rightarrow \infty . \tag{2.6} \end{align*}‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTpn‖⩽‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTyn‖+‖αnTyn−αnTpn‖⩽‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTyn‖+αn(‖Tyn‖+‖Tpn‖)(2.6)⩽‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTyn‖+2αnM→0 as n→∞.
    Condition (I) assures that lim n → ∞ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T y n ‖ = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞ p n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T y n = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞   p n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||=0=>lim_(n rarr oo)p_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|=0 \Rightarrow \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} p_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTyn‖=0⇒limn→∞pn=x∗. Thus, for a { p n } p n {p_(n)}\left\{p_{n}\right\}{pn} satisfying lim n → ∞ ‖ p n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) p n − α n T p n ‖ = 0 lim n → ∞   p n + 1 − 1 − α n p n − α n T p n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)||p_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))p_(n)-alpha_(n)Tp_(n)||=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|p_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) p_{n}-\alpha_{n} T p_{n}\right\|=0limn→∞‖pn+1−(1−αn)pn−αnTpn‖=0, we have shown that lim n → ∞ p n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   p n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)p_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} p_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞pn=x∗.
    Conversely, we prove (II) ⇒ ⇒ =>\Rightarrow⇒ (I). In (II) and (2.5) set p n := s n p n := s n p_(n):=s_(n)p_{n}:=s_{n}pn:=sn to obtain
    ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T y n ‖ ⩽ ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T s n ‖ + ‖ α n T y n − α n T s n ‖ (2.7) ⩽ ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T s n ‖ + 2 α n M → 0 as n → ∞ s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T y n ⩽ s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T s n + α n T y n − α n T s n (2.7) ⩽ s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T s n + 2 α n M → 0  as  n → ∞ {:[||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||],[quad <= ||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ts_(n)||+||alpha_(n)Ty_(n)-alpha_(n)Ts_(n)||],[(2.7)quad <= ||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ts_(n)||+2alpha_(n)M rarr0quad" as "n rarr oo]:}\begin{align*} & \left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\| \\ & \quad \leqslant\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T s_{n}\right\|+\left\|\alpha_{n} T y_{n}-\alpha_{n} T s_{n}\right\| \\ & \quad \leqslant\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T s_{n}\right\|+2 \alpha_{n} M \rightarrow 0 \quad \text { as } n \rightarrow \infty \tag{2.7} \end{align*}‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTyn‖⩽‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTsn‖+‖αnTyn−αnTsn‖(2.7)⩽‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTsn‖+2αnM→0 as n→∞
    Condition (II) assures that lim n → ∞ ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T s n ‖ = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞ s n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T s n = 0 ⇒ lim n → ∞   s n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ts_(n)||=0=>lim_(n rarr oo)s_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T s_{n}\right\|=0 \Rightarrow \lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} s_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTsn‖=0⇒limn→∞sn=x∗. Thus, for a { s n } s n {s_(n)}\left\{s_{n}\right\}{sn} satisfying lim n → ∞ ‖ s n + 1 − ( 1 − α n ) s n − α n T y n ‖ = 0 lim n → ∞   s n + 1 − 1 − α n s n − α n T y n = 0 lim_(n rarr oo)||s_(n+1)-(1-alpha_(n))s_(n)-alpha_(n)Ty_(n)||=0\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty}\left\|s_{n+1}-\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right) s_{n}-\alpha_{n} T y_{n}\right\|=0limn→∞‖sn+1−(1−αn)sn−αnTyn‖=0, we have shown that lim n → ∞ s n = x ∗ lim n → ∞   s n = x ∗ lim_(n rarr oo)s_(n)=x^(**)\lim _{n \rightarrow \infty} s_{n}=x^{*}limn→∞sn=x∗.
    Set in (1.1) and (1.2), T := T n T := T n T:=T^(n)T:=T^{n}T:=Tn, to obtain the modified Mann and modified Ishikawa iterations. We suppose that both modified Mann and modified Ishikawa iterations converge to a fixed point of T T TTT. Note that Definition 2.1, Remarks 2.2 and 2.3, and Theorem 2.4 hold in this case too.
    Corollary 2.5. Let X X XXX be a normed space and T : X → X T : X → X T:X rarr XT: X \rightarrow XT:X→X a map. Then the following are equivalent:
    (i) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , { β n } ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) , β n ⊂ [ 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1),{beta_(n)}sub[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\} \subset[0,1){αn}⊂(0,1),{βn}⊂[0,1) satisfying (1.3), the modified Ishikawa iteration is T T TTT-stable,
    (ii) for all { α n } ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) α n ⊂ ( 0 , 1 ) {alpha_(n)}sub(0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\} \subset(0,1){αn}⊂(0,1), satisfying (1.3), the modified Mann iteration is T T TTT-stable.

    References

    [1] S. Ishikawa, Fixed points by a new iteration method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1974) 147-150.
    [2] A.M. Harder, T. Hicks, Stability results for fixed point iteration procedures, Math. Japonica 33 (1988) 693706.
    [3] W.R. Mann, Mean value in iteration, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1953) 506-510.
    [4] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, On the equivalence of Mann and Ishikawa iteration methods, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003 (2003) 451-459.
    [5] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of Mann iteration and Ishikawa iteration for non-Lipschitzian operators, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003 (2003) 2645-2652.
    [6] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of Mann and Ishikawa iteration for ψ ψ psi\psiψ-uniformly pseudocontractive or ψ ψ psi\psiψ-uniformly accretive maps, Internat. J. Math. Math. Sci. 46 (2004) 2443-2452.
    [7] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of Mann and Ishikawa iteration for a Lipschitzian psi-uniformly pseudocontractive and psi-uniformly accretive maps, Tamkang J. Math. 35 (2004) 235-245.
    [8] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between the convergences of Ishikawa and Mann iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive in the intermediate sense and strongly successively pseudocontractive maps, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 289 (2004) 266-278.
    [9] B.E. Rhoades, Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between Mann-Ishikawa iteration and the multistep iteration, Nonlinear Anal. 58 (2004) 219-228.

      • Corresponding author.
      E-mail addresses: rhoades@indiana.edu (B.E. Rhoades), soltuzul@yahoo.com, stefanmsoltuz@yahoo.com (Ş.M. Şoltuz).

    Related Posts