In the present article, we study some fixed point theorems for a hybrid class of generalized contractive operators in the context of b-rectangular metric spaces. Examples justifying theorems and an open problem regarding to further generalizations for this type of operators are also given.
Authors
Cristian Daniel Alecsa
Babes-Bolyai University Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences Cluj-Napoca, Romania
”Tiberiu Popoviciu” Institute of Numerical Analysis Romanian Academy Cluj-Napoca, Romania
[1] Aage, C.T., Salunke, J.N., Some fixed point theorems for expansion onto mappings on cone metric spaces, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 27(2011), no. 6, 1101-1106.
[2] Alghamdi, M.A., Hussain, N., Salimi, P., Fixed point and coupled fixed point theorems on b-metric-like spaces, J. Ineq. Appl., 402(2013).
[3] Asadi, M., Some results of fixed point theorems in convex metric spaces, Nonlinear Func. Anal. Appl, 19(2014), no. 2, 171-175.
[4] Aydi, H., Karapinar, E., Moradi, S., Coincidence points for expansive mappings under c-distance in cone metric spaces, Int. Journal of Math. and Math. Sci., Vol. 2012, Art. ID 308921.
[5] Berinde, V., Pacurar, M., Stability of k-step fixed point iterative methods for some Presic type contractive mappings, J. Inequal. Appl., 149(2014).
[6] Branciari, A., A fixed point theorem of Banach-Caccioppoli type on a class of generalized metric spaces, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 57(2000), 31-37.
[7] Daheriya, R.D., Jain, R., Ughade, M., Some fixed point theorem for expansive type mapping in dislocated metric spaces, Internat. Sch. Research Network, ISRN Math. Analysis, Vol. 2012, Art. ID 376832, 5 pages.
[8] Ding, H.S., Ozturk, V., Radenovic, S., On some new fixed point results in b-rectangular metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 378-386.
[9] George, R., Radenovic, S., Reshma, K.P., Shukla, S., Rectangular b-metric space and contraction principles, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 1005-1013.
[10] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., Fixed point results in generalized metric spaces without Hausdorff property, Math. Sci., 8(2014), 125.
[11] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., On generalized metric spaces: A survey, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math., 5(2014), no. 1, 3-13.
[12] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., Pata-type common fixed point results in b-metric and b-rectangular metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 944-954.
[13] Karapinar, E., Fixed point theorems in cone Banach spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., Art. ID 609281 (2009).
[14] Kumar, S., Garg, S.K., Expansion mapping theorems in metric spaces, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, 4(2009), no. 36, 1749-1758.
[15] Moosaei, M., Fixed point theorems in convex metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 164(2012).
[16] Moosaei, M., Common fixed points for some generalized contraction pairs in convex metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 98(2014).
[17] Moosaei, M., Azizi, A., On coincidence points of generalized contractive pair mappings in convex metric spaces, J. of Hyperstructures, 4(2015), no. 2, 136-141.
[18] Olaoluwa, H., Olaleru, J.O., A hybrid class of expansive-contractive mappings in cone b-metric spaces, Afr. Mat.
[19] Pathak, H.K., Some fixed points of expansion mappings, Internat. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 19(1996), no. 1, 97-102.
[20] Patil, S.R., Salunke, J.N., Fixed point theorems for expansion mappings in cone rectangular metric spaces, Gen. Math. Notes, 29(2015), no. 1, 30-39.
[21] Rashwan, R.A,m Some fixed point theorems in cone rectangular metric spaces, Math. Aeterna, 2(2012), no. 6, 573-587.
[22] Roshan, J.R., Hussain, N., Parvanhh, V., Kadelburg, Z., New fixed point results in rectangular b-metric spaces, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 21(2016), 21, no. 5, 614-634.
[23] Wang, C., Zhang, T., Approximating common fixed points for a pair of generalized nonlinear mappings in convex metric spaces, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl., 9(2016), 1-7.
[24] Zangenehmehr, P., Farajzadeh, A.P., Lashkaripour, P., Karamian, A., On fixed point theory for generalized contractions in cone rectangular metric spaces via scalarizing, Thai Journal of Math., 45(2012), no. 3, 717-724.
Paper (preprint) in HTML form
Fixed point theorems for generalized contraction mappings on b-rectangular metric spaces
Cristian Daniel Alecsa
Abstract
In the present article, we study some fixed point theorems for a hybrid class of generalized contractive operators in the context of b-rectangular metric spaces. Examples justifying theorems and an open problem regarding to further generalizations for this type of operators are also given.
In this section we shall present some useful lemmas and definitions regarding rectangular and b-rectangular metric spaces. Also, we shall present some recent results in the field of fixed point theory concerning expansive operators and some generalized contraction mappings.
In [6], A. Branciari introduced a new metric-type space, when triangle inequality is replaced by an inequality which involves four different elements. This is called a rectangular metric space or a generalized metric space (g.m.s.)
Definition 1.1. Let , such that for each and (each distinct from and ), we have that
(1) ,
(2) ,
(3) .
Furthermore, from [10] we mention that convergent sequences and Cauchy sequences can be introduced in a similar manner as in metric spaces.
Also, from the same paper, we know that if ( ) is a rectangular metric space and if ( ) is a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence with the property that , for each , then converge to at most one point, i.e. the property that ( ) is
Haussdorf becomes superfluous.
Moreover, from [8], [9], [22], we recall the definition of b-rectangular metric spaces (or b-generalized metric spaces), briefly b-g.m.s.
Definition 1.2. Let be a given real number and , such that for each and (each distinct from and ), we have that
(1) ,
(2) ,
(3) .
As in metric spaces, we recall the basic notions regarding sequences in b-g.m.s:
Definition 1.3. Let ( ) be a b-g.m.s, and be a given sequence. Then
(a) ( ) is convergent in ( ) to an element , if for each , there exists , such that , for each . We denote this by .
(b) ( ) is Cauchy in ( ) (or b-rectangular Cauchy, briefly b-g.m.s.), if for each , there exists , such that , for each and for each . We denote this by , for each .
(c) ( ) is said to be complete b-g.m.s, if every Cauchy sequence in X converges to some .
We recall the following important remark from [8]:
Remark 1.4. (1) Every metric space and every rectangular metric space (g.m.s) is b-g.m.s.
(2) The limit of a sequence in a b-rectangular metric space is not unique.
(3) Every convergent sequence in a b-g.m.s is not necessarily a b-g.m.s Cauchy.
For this, we recall a crucial lemma from [8], i.e. (Lemma 1.5), that specify when a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence can’t have two limits in a b-g.m.s.
Lemma 1.5. Let be a -rectangular metric space, with the coefficient . Let be a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence in , such that , for each . Then ( ) can converge to at most one point.
Also, we recall from [12] and [8] the following crucial lemma.
Lemma 1.6. Let be a -rectangular metric space, with the coefficient . Also, let be a sequence for which , for every , with . If is not a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence, then there exists , such that for each , there exists ( ) and ( ) two sequences of positive integers, such that
In [22], another crucial lemma regarding sequences in b-rectangular metric spaces was presented. For convenience, we remind it below.
Lemma 1.7. Let be a b-g.m.s., with coefficient .
(a) Consider two sequences and , such that converges to and converges to , with . Also, suppose that for each and . Then
(b) Consider an element and a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence ( ), such that , for each . Moreover, suppose that the sequence ( ) converges to an element . Then
Finally, for the convenience of the reader, we recall some important results in brectangular metric spaces. In [9], George et.al.studied basic contraction-type mappings in b-rectangular metric spaces, like Kannan operators, i.e.
In [8], Radenovic et.al. extended the results to mappings satisfying
for each and studied unique coincidence and common fixed points for the pair of operators ( ) that satisfies some additional assumptions.
Also, for more results in b-rectangular metric spaces and for a consistent survey on different generalized metric-type spaces, we recommend [11] and [12].
Now, regarding generalized contraction mappings we recall some recent advances in this subfield of fixed point theory.
In [13], Karapinar studied unique fixed points for some generalized contractions on cone Banach spaces satisfying the following contractive-type conditions
and
Moreover, in 2009, Kumar [14] presented some theorems for two maps satisfying the following
where is onto and is one-to-one.
Moosaei, Azizi, Asadi and Wang generalized the results of Karapinar as follows In [15], Moosaei used Krasnoselskii’s iteration defined in convex metric spaces, for the following mappings, that satisfy
respectively
In [17], Moosaei and Azizi extended the results to generalized contraction-type operators, studying coincidence points for various mappings, such as
where and are closed and convex subsets of a convex metric space and the coefficients satisfy
Nevertheless, in 2014, Moosaei [16] studied a more generalized pair of contractions , where
with some assumptions on contractive-coefficients, i.e.
Asadi in [3], using the same iteration (Krasnoselskii) on convex metric spaces, studied fixed points for generalized Hardy-Rogers type-mappings, as follows
where
and is the coefficient of Krasnoselskii’s iteration.
Furthermore, Wang and Zhang, in [23] extended the above results for pairs of generalized Hardy-Rogers type contractions.
Now, expansive and expansive-type mappings can be considered a particular case of generalized contractions. Regarding the former ones, we recall some recent development into the study of this type of operators.
In 2011, Aage [1] considered expansive mappings in cone metric spaces. The more general form of these mappings, with some underlying assumptions, are
where satisfies and .
Aydi et.al. studied in [4] some interesting fixed point theorems for pairs of expansive mappings for spaces endowed with c-distances. We recall them using the standard notations for metric spaces, i.e.
with and complete.
Also, in cone rectangular metric spaces, some fixed point theorems were developed. For example, in [20], pair of mappings satisfying
were studied, with some assumptions on the coefficients and and on the range of and .
These pairs of generalized mappings were extended by Olaoluwa and Olaleru in [18], but in the framework of b-metric spaces and for a pair of four mappings, as follows
Also, for the sake of convenience, we recall other studies in metric-type spaces and for expansive-type mappings, as follows: in [24] generalized mappings were studied on cone rectangular metric spaces using the technique of scalarizing, in [21] mappings that satisfy
were studied on cone rectangular metric spaces and in [19], fixed point theorems for a general type of expansive mappings were developed, satisfying
Also, in the context of dislocated metric spaces, Daheriya et.al. [7] studied rationaltype expansive mappings, and in [2] Alghamdi studied fixed points for generalized expansive mappings in b-metric like spaces.
The purpose of this work is to extend some fixed results for a hybrid class of generalized contractive-type mappings and for some expansive-type operators in the context of b-rectangular metric spaces. Moreover, at the end of the second section, we shall let and open problem.
2. Main results
Moosaei in [15] used Krasnoselskii iteration to develop fixed point theorems for generalized contractions on convex metric spaces. It is easily seen that we can use Picard instead of Krasnoselkii sequences in metric spaces.
In this section, our aim is to extend the results of Moosaei [15] for generalized contraction mappings from metric spaces to b-rectangular metric spaces. Also, we extend and develop the fixed point results of Aage [1] from cone metric spaces to b-g.m.s. Furthermore, we extend results from [20] of Patil, from rectangular metric spaces to b-rectangular ones (b-g.m.s).
Also, examples similar to those in [1], [12] and [20] justifying our theorems are given. Now, let’s consider generalized contractions on a b-g.m.s. , satisfying the following condition:
We will analyze two separate cases: when and . Also, for expansive-type mappings, i.e. when , we consider two types of sequence, namely the classical Picard iteration , for each and the ’inverse’ Picard iteration, i.e. , for each , for which we require that the operator is onto.
Our first result is a theorem for the existence and uniqueness of the fixed point of a mapping satisfying the contractive condition from above. The technique we will use is based on the (Lemma 1.6).
Theorem 2.1. Let ( ) be a complete -rectangular metric space (b-gms), with coefficient . Consider a mapping , satisfying the following contractive condition
Also, suppose the following assumptions are satisfied
(A) If and , then ,
(B) If and , then we have no additional conditions,
(C) If and , then .
Then, the Picard sequence ( ), defined as , for each converges to a fixed point of the mapping .
Proof. We consider the Picard iterative process ( ), defined as , for each . Applying the contractive condition for the pair , we get that
So , where from the theorem’s assumptions, since .
So . Since , it follows that .
Also, by a routine argument (by reductio ad absurdum), it follows easily that , for each and that , for each .
The next step is to show that the sequence ( ) is b-rectangular Cauchy. We will use (Lemma 1.6) and we shall apply it on three different cases
(1) Case : Let’s suppose that the sequence ( ) is not b-rectangular Cauchy. Then, there exists and two sequences of nonnegative real numbers ( ) and , such that the assumptions from (Lemma 1.6) are satisfied.
Now, we will apply the contraction condition for and . It follows that
.
Because , we have that
.
Now, we want to apply the limit superior. We make the following necessary remark and consider the following cases
If , then , so , so an upper bound for this element is 0 .
If , then , so . Applying the limit superior, we get that
The same reasoning can be made about the sign of the coefficient and about the limit superior of the sequence as a subsequence of .
Case (A): When .
Since , we have that . We know that . Multiplying by and taking the limit superior, we get that
From (Lemma 1.6), it follows that , so . This is a contradiction with the assumption that in this case we have .
Case (B): When .
In this case we have that , so , then we can take 0 as an upper bound for it. By (Lemma 1.6), we have that . Since and , we got a contradiction.
Now, in the two cases from above, we have shown that is b-rectangular Cauchy. Moreover, we have said that , for each .
Since ( ) is complete, it implies that there exists , such that , i.e.
Now, we shall show that is a fixed point for
Since , then
So
Taking the limit when , we get
so . Furthermore, since and , then is a fixed point for .
(2) Case : We have that
So
This is a case of expansive-type mapping. By (Lemma 1.6), there exists , such that for every , there exists two sequences of nonnegative real numbers such that the assumptions in the already mentioned lemma are true. By b-rectangular inequality, we have that
Dividing by , we obtain the following
Case (C): When : Here we have that . Multiplying by , it implies that
Now, we apply the contractive condition for and , i.e.
.
So, combining the above inequalities, we get that
From the limit superior, we have get the following
We have the same reasoning for , with coefficient . Also, for coefficients and , we have that
If , then , so , so we can make the lower bound 0 .
If , then , so , so taking the limit superior, it follows that:
Same remarks can be made about the coefficient and for .
By (Lemma 1.6), we get that
So . This is a contradiction with the fact that in this case .
Now, since , for each Cauchy b-rectangular and ( ) is complete, then there exists , such that . We shall show that is a fixed point for the mapping .
Applying the contractive condition on the pair ( ), we get
Letting , we have and since we know that , it follows that is a fixed point for the mapping .
Relative to (Theorem 2.1), we give two examples that validate cases (A) and(C): From [12], we recall an example of a complete b-rectangular metric space.
Example 2.2. Let , where and . We define , such that and
, otherwise.
Then ( ) is a complete b-rectangular metric space, with coefficient . Furthermore, ( ) is not a metric space or a rectangular metric space.
Regarding case (A) of (Theorem 2.1), we give the following example.
Example 2.3. Let be the b-rectangular metric space defined above, with . Also, define , such as
It is easy to observe that has a unique fixed point . Moreover, we shall show that satisfies
for each .
Let’s define: and .
We have the following cases
1.
and , so the above inequality is valid.
2.
and , so the inequality of is true.
Now, for the non-trivial cases, it follows that:
3) and :
Also .
We have that
So
so , which is obviously true.
4) and
and
We have that
so , which is also true.
Moreover, we show that the conditions from (Theorem 2.1) - case ( ) on the coefficients are satisfied
Now, we construct an example of a complete b-rectangular metric space, which will be used further in this section.
Example 2.4. Let and define , such as
We will prove that is a b-rectangular metric space with coefficient , which is not a rectangular metric space.
For a b-rectangular metric space, we have that , for each , with being distinct. We have the following cases.
•
When , the right hand side is 0 , so the above inequality remains valid.
•
When , we employ the following sub-cases
Case (1): If and and by symmetry):
Case (2): If and ( and by symmetry):
Case (3): If and ( and by symmetry):
Case (4): If and and by symmetry):
Case (5): If and and by symmetry):
So ,so we can take .
Furthermore, ( ) is not a b-g.m.s., because
so , which is valid.
Now, we construct an example, justifying case ( ) of (Theorem 2.1).
Example 2.5. Let the b-rectangular metric space defined above, with coefficient .
Let a self-mapping defined on .
We shall show that satisfies
and also the conditions from case ( ) of (Theorem 2.1).
Let satisfy . Let’s normalize the contractive condition, by taking We shall determine the coefficients , with and . We have the following cases
1.
If , then , so the left hand side is 0 . Now, the right hand side is . This implies that . We have two sub-cases:
If , then , so the inequality is valid. Also, if , then , so we have the condition that .
2.
If , we have the following sub-cases
a) For and , it follows that . Since , then , so .
Moreover, one can easily verify that , for each ,
, for each and .
b) For and , it follows that .
Moreover, we have that , for each ,
and , for each value of .
c) For (simultaneously), it follows that . Also
Now .
Furthermore, we have that
Now, we analyze the conditions on .
For the case (1), we get . For the case (2a), we get that
because . So .
For the case (2b), we obtain
because . So .
For the case (2c), it follows that
because and , so .
Additionally, satisfies the conditions from (Theorem 2.1) - Case (C).
Let’s take , with . We verify that the coefficients verify all of the above conditions
Remark 2.6. We observe that the contractive condition when , can be written as:
Taking and , it follows that the operator is of Reich-type, so the above theorem (when ) is similar with the results of [8].
Now, we present an useful lemma for expansive-type mappings in b-rectangular metric spaces, following the technique used in [18].
Lemma 2.7. Let ( ) a b-rectangular metric space. Also, consider and arbitrary elements of , each distinct from each other. Then
Proof. Let arbitrary points from , each distinct from each other. We analyze two cases for the parameter :
Case (1): Let . From the b-rectangular inequality, we get that:
Case (2): Let . From the b-rectangular inequality, it follows that:
So, from the above inequality, we have that
Combining these cases, it follows that
, where
Similar to [18], we get that
Also, as a final remark, we observe that , for each .
For expansive-type mappings, i.e. when , we make the following important remark.
Remark 2.8. We have studied contraction-type mappings, that satisfied
By some substitutions we can make the mapping satisfy
where
We will analyze the cases when and , so, when , respectively .
Now, involving rate of convergence, we present a constructive fixed point theorem for expansive-type mappings in b-rectangular metric spaces, using Picard iterative process.
Theorem 2.9. Let ( ) a complete -rectangular metric space, endowed with coefficient . Also, consider a mapping satisfying
Moreover, suppose the following conditions are satisfied
(i) ,
(ii) If , then we have the additional assumptions .
If , then we have the additional assumptions and . Then, the mapping has a fixed point.
Proof. In the proof of (Theorem 2.1), we have shown that the Picard sequence for generalized contraction satisfy , for each , where . This is also valid for the situation of expansive-type mappings, when . The condition that the Picard sequence is asymptotically regular was that .
In our case,
Now , by hypothesis assumptions: and . By the contractive-type condition, we have that
and applying it for the pair ( ), we obtain
(2.1)
Now, we will try to evaluate an upper bound for , for each , i.e. using (Lemma 2.7), we obtain that
Now, let’s denote by and by , for each .
From (2.1) we have
This means that
.
Let’s denote by and by .
From the hypothesis, we know that , i.e. , since . Then it follows that and are positive.
Furthermore, since , we have that . So . For , we get that . So, we have two cases:
•
When , i.e. :
Then, the condition that becomes , i.e. .
Now, since , then , which is true. Also, since , then , which is a valid assumption.
Moreover, from the hypothesis condition that , we employ two sub-cases If , then , i.e. , so . Since , this is obviously not true.
If , then , so (the denominator in is positive, so is positive). Since , then . Moreover, since , then we get , which is valid from hypothesis (ii).
Finally, we can verify easily that since , then and since , then , which are evidently true.
•
We know verify the case when , i.e. :
Since , then , which is true by hypothesis (ii).
Moreover, since , then is obviously true, also by hypothesis. Also, since , then , which is valid by the fact that .
Also, as in previous case, by the assumption on that , if , then , which contradicts the fact that .
So and from the assumption that means that the right hand side , so , which is valid.
So , for each . We know that
where , with an arbitrary fixed element.
So .
We take a major bound for :
The last term is , so . This means that
Let’s denote by . The first term in the sum is . This is a geometric progression, with general term and , so
So . Now we can show that the sequence ( ) is b-rectangular Cauchy. We shall evaluate , for each and fixed. We divide in two cases: the first one, when , with and the second one, when , with :
Case (i): When , with . We evaluate
where . So, we get the following estimation
and by hypothesis we know that is satisfied. So, , when and fixed.
Case (ii): When , with . We evaluate
Also, we have shown that . So , where .
Now, we have two cases: if , then and this converge to 0 as . In a similar manner, if , then
and this converge to 0 as . This reasoning is valid, since, from the theorem’s assumptions, we know that and . So, in this case, since , then , as .
So, from both cases, we have shown that is a b-rectangular Cauchy sequence. Also, we know that , for each and that ( ) is complete. This means that there exists , such that .
Moreover, since the contractive condition can be reduced to the original form, i.e. , then, as in the proof of (Theorem 2.1), there exists a unique point of , as long as and .
Finally, we give an example regarding (Theorem 2.9).
Example 2.10. Let ( ), with be the b-rectangular metric space, endowed with the b-rectangular metric from (Example 2.2). Define a self-mapping , by: and . It is obviously that has as a unique fixed point the element . We will determine the coefficients and , such that satisfies :
(2.2)
(2.3)
(2.4)
(2.5)
(2.6)
(2.7)
(2.8)
(2.9)
(2.10)
(2.11)
(2.12)
(2.13)
(2.14)
Now, we observe that (2.11) and (2.14) are equivalent relations. Also, we shall employ the more restrictive conditions on the coefficients and , i.e. inequalities (2.11), (2.3), (2.5), (2.7), (2.8) and (2.14). Furthermore, we shall impose more restrictive conditions such that the number of inequalities is reduced: instead of (2.11) and (2.3), we impose that , instead of (2.7) and (2.8) we require only (2.7) and instead of and (2.5), we require . We mention that all of the above reasoning was made under the assumptions that and . Now, we have only two conditions, along with the conditions from (Theorem 2.9), when
Now, taking account of the fact that , we can find some values for the coefficients and . For example, the inequalities are satisfied when and .
Now, we recall (Lemma 2) from [5], that is crucial for inequalities involving difference inequations.
Lemma 2.11. Let ( ) and ( ) be two sequences of nonnegative real numbers, such that
If and , then it follows that .
Remark 2.12. In the previous proof, we have shown that the following estimation is valid
So, based on this lemma, we give a nonconstructive approach for evaluating ( ) as a Cauchy sequence.
In the above lemma, let’s take . Then, we get that , with and . Then .
Now, we have proved that .
Let’s define the following: and . Since and , then apply (Lemma 2) from [5] with the particular case when , we get that .
Now, we give a proof for expansive-type mappings under the new assumption such that the mapping is onto and we shall use the ’inverse’ Picard iterative process.
Theorem 2.13. Let ( ) be a complete b-rectangular metric space and a mapping satisfying
Let continuous and onto. Suppose that
(i) and .
Also, suppose the following additional assumptions
Case (E1), i.e. : Suppose that the following assumptions are satisfied:
(ii)
Case (E2), i.e. : Suppose the following assumptions are satisfied:
(ii)
(iii)
Then, the mapping has a fixed point in .
Proof. Here, we know that is continuous and onto. Let be an arbitrary point. As we have shown in the previous theorem, i.e. (Theorem 2.9), we reduce the contractive condition to
Because is an onto mapping, by definition, we have that for each , there exists , such that .
Now, for , there exists , such that . Also, for , there exists , such that . Inductively, we get that , for each .
Applying the contractive condition on the pair , it follows that:
where . From the hypothesis,we know that , because , and . Furthermore, we have that . For simplicity, let’s denote by .
Furthermore, as in the previous theorem, let , for each .
Now, we shall analyze two different cases for estimation of
Case (E1): When , or with the original notation, . Since , we get that .
Applying the expansive-type condition on the pair ( ), it follows that
Since , so , it follows that
Since and , we get, by (Lemma 2) in [5] and by (Lemma 2.11), that . Now, as in the proof of (Theorem 2.9), we give a constructive approach for the upper bound of . Furthermore, we shall omit the details. We know that , briefly , where
and . When , then , and, by hypothesis, , then converges to 0 .
When , then . Since and , by theorem’s assumptions, then converges to 0 .
Moreover, .
Case (E2): When . We shall use (Lemma 2.7):
We know that , for each .
As in the previous case, with the remark that we divide by , we get that
By (Lemma 2.7), we get that
Since, by theorem’s assumptions, , we get that
On the other hand, let’s denote by and by . Since and , then . Also, from , then . Now, requires that and this is true since . Moreover, , because and so . This means that and are positive, so the sum of these two is positive. Now, we want to validate if the sum of and is less than 1 .
So is equivalent to . Since , then . Now, we have two sub-cases.
If , then , i.e. , so this is false, because and .
So, the only valid case is when , so . Since and have different signs, this is also valid. Now, because and by the fact that the right hand side is positive, it follows that , i.e. , which is valid by hypothesis assumptions. Since , then .
Also, since and , then . The rest of the proof follows as usual.
Now, we give an example of a b-rectangular metric space, which is b-rectangular and validate (Theorem 2.13) through another example, showing that the hypotheses and conclusion of the already mentioned theorem are true also in b-metric spaces.
Example 2.14. Let , endowed with , such that , for each . Then is a complete b-metric space, with coefficient . Then, it is also a complete b-rectangular metric space, with coefficient .
Example 2.15. Let , where is the above b-rectangular metric, with . Define as , with . It is easy to see that is continuous. Also, for each , there exists ,, since and are positive, so is onto. Moreover:
Let’s take and . Also, let , i.e. . For example: and .
Then satisfies , for each .
As an open problem with respect to generalized contractions in b-rectangular metric spaces, we give the following.
Open Problem. Following [3], consider a self-mapping defined on a complete brectangular space ( ) with coefficient , that satisfy
Develop fixed point theorems for the self-mapping above, in the context of brectangular metric spaces, with suitable conditions on the coefficients .
Acknowledgments. The author is grateful to the referees for their suggestions that contributed to the improvement of the paper.
References
[1] Aage, C.T., Salunke, J.N., Some fixed point theorems for expansion onto mappings on cone metric spaces, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series, 27(2011), no. 6, 1101-1106.
[2] Alghamdi, M.A., Hussain, N., Salimi, P., Fixed point and coupled fixed point theorems on b-metric-like spaces, J. Ineq. Appl., 402(2013).
[3] Asadi, M., Some results of fixed point theorems in convex metric spaces, Nonlinear Func. Anal. Appl, 19(2014), no. 2, 171-175.
[4] Aydi, H., Karapinar, E., Moradi, S., Coincidence points for expansive mappings under c-distance in cone metric spaces, Int. Journal of Math. and Math. Sci., Vol. 2012, Art. ID 308921.
[5] Berinde, V., Păcurar, M., Stability of -step fixed point iterative methods for some Presic type contractive mappings, J. Inequal. Appl., 149(2014).
[6] Branciari, A., A fixed point theorem of Banach-Caccioppoli type on a class of generalized metric spaces, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 57(2000), 31-37.
[7] Daheriya, R.D., Jain, R., Ughade, M., Some fixed point theorem for expansive type mapping in dislocated metric spaces, Internat. Sch. Research Network, ISRN Math. Analysis, Vol. 2012, Art. ID 376832, 5 pages.
[8] Ding, H.S., Ozturk, V., Radenovic, S., On some new fixed point results in b-rectangular metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 378-386.
[9] George, R., Radenovic, S., Reshma, K.P., Shukla, S., Rectangular b-metric space and contraction principles, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 1005-1013.
[10] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., Fixed point results in generalized metric spaces without Hausdorff property, Math. Sci., 8(2014), 125.
[11] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., On generalized metric spaces: A survey, TWMS J. Pure Appl. Math., 5(2014), no. 1, 3-13.
[12] Kadelburg, Z., Radenovic, S., Pata-type common fixed point results in b-metric and b-rectangular metric spaces, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 8(2015), 944-954.
[13] Karapinar, E., Fixed point theorems in cone Banach spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., Art. ID 609281 (2009).
[14] Kumar, S., Garg, S.K., Expansion mapping theorems in metric spaces, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, 4(2009), no. 36, 1749-1758.
[15] Moosaei, M., Fixed point theorems in convex metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 164(2012).
[16] Moosaei, M., Common fixed points for some generalized contraction pairs in convex metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 98(2014).
[17] Moosaei, M., Azizi, A., On coincidence points of generalized contractive pair mappings in convex metric spaces, J. of Hyperstructures, 4(2015), no. 2, 136-141.
[18] Olaoluwa, H., Olaleru, J.O., A hybrid class of expansive-contractive mappings in cone -metric spaces, Afr. Mat.
[19] Pathak, H.K., Some fixed points of expansion mappings, Internat. J. Math. and Math. Sci., 19(1996), no. 1, 97-102.
[20] Patil, S.R., Salunke, J.N., Fixed point theorems for expansion mappings in cone rectangular metric spaces, Gen. Math. Notes, 29(2015), no. 1, 30-39.
[21] Rashwan, R.A,m Some fixed point theorems in cone rectangular metric spaces, Math. Aeterna, 2(2012), no. 6, 573-587.
[22] Roshan, J.R., Hussain, N., Parvaneh, V., Kadelburg, Z., New fixed point results in rectangular b-metric spaces, Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 21(2016), 21, no. 5, 614-634.
[23] Wang, C., Zhang, T., Approximating common fixed points for a pair of generalized nonlinear mappings in convex metric spaces, J. Nonlinear. Sci. Appl., 9(2016), 1-7.
[24] Zangenehmehr, P., Farajzadeh, A.P., Lashkaripour, P., Karamian, A., On fixed point theory for generalized contractions in cone rectangular metric spaces via scalarizing, Thai Journal of Math., 45(2012), no. 3, 717-724.
Cristian Daniel Alecsa
Babeş-Bolyai University
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Sciences
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
e-mail: cristian.alecsa@math.ubbcluj.ro "Tiberiu Popoviciu" Institute of Numerical Analysis
Romanian Academy
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
e-mail: cristian.alecsa@ictp.acad.ro