On Wachnicki’s Generalization of the Gauss–Weierstrass Integral

Abstract


The paper aims at a generalization of the Gauss–Weierstrass integral introduced by Eugeniusz Wachnicki two decades ago. It is intimately connected to a generalization of the heat equation. The main result is an asymptotic expansion for the operators when applied to a function belonging to a rather large class. An essential auxiliary result is a localization theorem which is interesting in itself.

Authors

Octavian Agratini
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis, Romanian Academy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Keywords

Gauss–Weierstrass operator; Bessel function; Kummer function; Asymptotic expansion; Degree of approximation

Paper coordinates

U. Abel and O. Agratini, On Wachnicki’s Generalization of the Gauss-Weierstrass Integral, In: Candela, A.M., Cappelletti Montano, M., Mangino, E. (eds) Recent  advances in Mathematical Analysis. Trends in Mathematics,  Birkhäuser, Cham., pp 1–13,

PDF

About this paper

Journal

Recent Advances in Mathematical Analysis 

Publisher Name

Birkhäuser, Cham

Print ISSN
Online ISSN

google scholar link

Paper (preprint) in HTML form

On Wachnicki’s generalization of the Gauss–Weierstrass integral

On Wachnicki’s generalization of the Gauss–Weierstrass integral

Ulrich Abel Fachbereich MND,
Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen,
Wilhelm-Leuschner-Straße 13,
61169 Friedberg, Germany
ulrich.abel@mnd.thm.de
 and  Octavian Agratini Babeş-Bolyai University,
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science,
Str. Kogălniceanu, 1, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
and
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis,
Romanian Academy,
Str. Fântânele, 57, 400320 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
agratini@math.ubbcluj.ro
Abstract.

The paper aims at a generalization of the Gauss–Weierstrass integral introduced by Eugeniusz Wachnicki two decades ago. It is intimately connected to a generalization of the heat equation. The main result is an asymptotic expansion for the operators when applied to a function belonging to a rather large class. An essential auxiliary result is a localization theorem which is interesting in itself.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 41A36, 41A60.

Keywords and phrases: Gauss–Weierstrass operator, Bessel function, Kummer function, asymptotic expansion, degree of approximation.

1. Introduction

It is acknowledged that linear positive operators are a useful tool in approximating signals from various spaces. Referring to operators of either discrete or continuous type, a natural challenge is to highlight their properties. Two decades ago Eugeniusz Wachnicki [16] defined an integral operator representing a generalization of the classical Gauss–Weierstrass operators. One of the genuine Gauss–Weierstrass operator’s write modes is as follows

W⁢(f;x,t)=12⁢π⁢t⁢∫ℝexp⁡(−(x−y)24⁢t)⁢f⁢(y)⁢𝑑y, (1)

where t>0 is a parameter, x∈ℝ and f:ℝ→ℝ is chosen so that the integral exists and is finite. A concise but relevant presentation of these operators can be found, e.g., in the monograph [6, Section 5.2.9]. We mention that a modification of the operators (1) was presented by Altomare and Sabina, see [7].

Actually, the W⁢f transform is a smoothed out version of f obtained by averaging the values of f with a Gaussian signal centered at x. Specifically, it is the function Gt given by

Gt⁢(x)=12⁢π⁢t⁢∫ℝf⁢(y)⁢exp⁡(−(x−y)24⁢t)⁢𝑑y=12⁢π⁢t⁢∫ℝf⁢(x−y)⁢exp⁡(−y24⁢t)⁢𝑑y

representing the convolution of f with the Gaussian function

x↦12⁢π⁢t⁢exp⁡(−x2/(4⁢t)).

Weierstrass used a variant of this transform in his original proof of the famous Approximation Theorem which bears his name. Also, this transform is intimately related to the heat equation or, equivalently, the diffusion equation with constant diffusion coefficient. These are only a few reasons why it has been intensively studied over time. We note that an extension of this integral was performed even in q-Calculus [8]. Among the most recent papers published in 2021, without intending to bring up them all, we mention [9], [17].

2. The operators

First of all we recall the modified Bessel function of the first kind and fractional order α>−1, see, e.g., [5, Chapter 10]. Denoting by Iα, it is described by the series

Iα⁢(z)=(z2)α⁢∑k=0∞(14⁢z2)kk!⁢Γ⁢(α+k+1), (2)

where Γ is the Gamma function. An integral formula for this function (for Re⁢(z)>0) will be read as follows

Iα⁢(z)=1π⁢∫0πez⁢cos⁡θ⁢cos⁡(α⁢θ)⁢𝑑θ−sin⁡(α⁢π)π⁢∫0∞e−z⁢cosh⁡(t)−α⁢t⁢𝑑t.

We indicate two particular cases useful throughout the paper

I−1/2⁢(z)=2π⁢z⁢cosh⁡(z),I1/2⁢(z)=2π⁢z⁢sinh⁡(z), (3)

see, e.g., [5, p. 433]. In the above, cosh, sinh represent the usual notation of hyperbolic functions.

Set ℝ+=[0,∞). For a fixed constant K≥0, we consider the space

EK={ f:ℝ+→ℝ∣f⁢ is locally integrable and ⁢(∃)⁡Mf≥0,
|f(s)|≤MfeK⁢s2,s>0}.

The space is endowed with the norm ∥⋅∥K,

‖f‖K=sups∈ℝ+|f⁢(s)|⁢e−K⁢s2.

We consider the operator Wα defined on EK by the following relation

Wα⁢(f;r,t)=12⁢t⁢∫0∞r−α⁢sα+1⁢exp⁡(−r2+s24⁢t)⁢Iα⁢(r⁢s2⁢t)⁢f⁢(s)⁢𝑑s, (4)

where α≥−1/2, (r,t)∈(0,∞)×(0,∞) and Iα is given at (2).

Wα was introduced in [16, Eq. (1)] with a minor modification of the domain EK in which the author inserted f∈C⁢(ℝ+).

Since Wα⁢f, f∈EK, is well defined for any K>0, we can consider the domain of Wα as E:=⋃K>0EK.

Wachnicki [16, Theorem 4] showed the convergence

limt→0+Wα⁢(f;r,t)=f⁢(r),

for f∈E∩C⁢(ℝ+), uniformly on compact subintervals of (0,+∞).

For α≥−1/2, the function Wα⁢(f;r,t) is an example of the solution of the generalized heat equation

∂u∂t=∂2u∂r2+2⁢α+1r⁢∂u∂r. (5)

If α=n/2−1, n∈ℕ, Eq. (5) is the heat equation in ℝn+1 in radial coordinates.

Recently, in [12] an extension of this operator was achieved for continuous functions defined on the domain (0,∞)×ℝ and bounded by certain two-dimensional exponential functions.

Remark. For α=−1/2 the operator defined by (4) becomes the authentic Gauss–Weierstrass operator, a specification that can be found in [16]. Because the statement was not accompanied by a proof, we insert it as a detail in our paper. More precisely we prove

W−1/2⁢f=W⁢f^,f∈EK, (6)

see (1), where f^⁢(s)=f⁢((sgn⁢s)⁢s), s∈ℝ.

Indeed, for any (r,t)∈(0,∞)×(0,∞), taking in view (3), we can write

W−1/2⁢(f;r,t)
=12⁢t⁢4⁢tπ⁢∫0∞exp⁡(−r2+s24⁢t)⁢cosh⁡(r⁢s2⁢t)⁢f⁢(s)⁢𝑑s
=1π⁢t⁢∫0∞exp⁡(−r2+s24⁢t)⁢12⁢(exp⁡(r⁢s2⁢t)+exp⁡(−r⁢s2⁢t))⁢f⁢(s)⁢𝑑s
=12⁢π⁢t⁢∫0∞(exp⁡(−(r−s)24⁢t)+exp⁡(−(r+s)24⁢t))⁢f⁢(s)⁢𝑑s
=12⁢π⁢t⁢(∫0∞exp⁡(−(r−s)24⁢t)⁢f⁢(s)⁢𝑑s+∫−∞0exp⁡(−(r−s)24⁢t))⁢f⁢(−s)⁢d⁢s
=W⁢(f^;r,t).

3. The asymptotic expansion

To achieve our goal and to obtain a self contained exposure, we recall the following notions.

For factorial powers (falling respective rising factorial) we use the notations

uk¯=∏ℓ=0k−1(u−ℓ),uk¯=∏ℓ=0k−1(u+ℓ),k∈ℕ.

An empty product (k=0) is taken to be 1.

Kummer’s function of the first kind, also known as the confluent hypergeometric function of the first kind, is commonly denoted M⁢(a,b,z) or F11⁢(a,b,z) and defined as follows

M⁢(a,b,z) ≡1F1⁢(a,b,z)=1+ab⁢z+a⁢(a+1)b⁢(b+1)⁢2!⁢z2+…
=∑k=0∞ak¯bk¯⁢k!⁢zk,z∈ℂ, (7)

see [5, Chapter 13]. If b∈ℤ∖ℕ, then M is undefined. Otherwise the series is convergent for all z∈ℂ.

Let us denote ei the monomials ei⁢(x)=xi, i∈ℕ0=ℕ∪{0}. Clearly, ei∈EK, for each K. We determine all moments of the operator Wα.

Proposition 1.

Let Wα be defined by (4). For each i∈ℕ0 the identity

Wα⁢(ei;r,t)=(4⁢t)i/2⁢exp⁡(−r24⁢t)⁢Γ⁢(α+1+i/2)Γ⁢(α+1)⁢M⁢(α+1+i2,α+1,r24⁢t) (8)

takes place, where M stands for Kummer function (3). Moreover

Wα⁢(ei;r,t)∼ri⁢∑n=0∞1n!⁢(i2)n¯⁢(α+i2)n¯⁢(4⁢tr2)n(t→0+). (9)
Proof.

By a straightforward calculation we obtain

Wα⁢(ei;r,t)
=12⁢t⁢(14⁢t)α⁢exp⁡(−r24⁢t)⁢∑k=0∞Γ⁢(k+α+1+i/2)k!⁢Γ⁢(k+α+1)⁢(r4⁢t)2⁢k⁢2i+2⁢α+1+2⁢k⁢tα+1+k+i/2
=(4⁢t)i/2⁢exp⁡(−r24⁢t)⁢∑k=0∞Γ⁢(k+α+1+i/2)k!⁢Γ⁢(k+α+1)⁢(r24⁢t)k.

By using Kummer function defined by (3) and the well-known relation

Γ⁢(u+k)=Γ⁢(u)⁢uk¯,u>0,k∈ℕ0,

we arrive at (8).

Further, we use the asymptotic expansion of Kummer function for large argument. To accomplish this, we use for example Digital Library of Mathematical Functions [18, Formulas 13.2.4, 13.7.1].

M⁢(a,b,x)∼Γ⁢(b)Γ⁢(a)⁢ex⁢xa−b⁢∑n=0∞(b−a)n¯⁢(1−a)n¯n!⁢x−n(x→∞),a∉ℤ∖ℕ0.

Returning at (8) with x=r24⁢t, we get

Wα⁢(ei;r,t)∼ri⁢∑n=0∞1n!⁢(−i2)n¯⁢(−α−i2)n¯⁢(4⁢tr2)(t→0+).

Knowing that (−u)n¯=(−1)n⁢un¯, we obtain (9) and the proof is ended. ∎

Remark. i) Formula (9) means that

Wα⁢(ei;r,t)=ei⁢(r)+∑n=1q1n!⁢(i2)n¯⁢(α+i2)n¯⁢(4⁢tr2)n+o⁢(tq)(t→0+)

for all q∈ℕ.

ii) If i=2⁢k, k∈ℕ, is an even integer, Wα⁢(e2⁢k;r,t) is a polynomial as a function of r, since M⁢(α+1+k,α+1,r24⁢t) is a finite sum. The polynomials determined in this way are called radial heat polynomials (see [10]). For k=0,1,2 formula (8) easily leads us to the explicit formulas [16, Eq. (13)]

Wα⁢(e0;r,t) = 1,
Wα⁢(e2;r,t) = r2+4⁢(α+1)⁢t,
Wα⁢(e4;r,t) = r4+8⁢(α+2)⁢r2⁢t+16⁢(α+1)⁢(α+2)⁢t2.

The first formula implies the fact that the operator reproduces the constants. In the special case α=−1/2 we have the representation (see [14, Eq. (1.2)])

W−1/2⁢(e2⁢k;r,t)=k!⁢∑j=0⌊k/2⌋xk−2⁢j(k−2⁢j)!⁢tjj!.

Further we introduce the j-th central moments of Wα operator, j∈ℕ0, i.e., Wα⁢ψrj, where ψr⁢(s)=s−r, s>0, r>0.

Lemma 2.

For each j∈ℕ, the operator Wα defined by (4) satisfies the relation

Wα⁢(ψrj;r,t)∼Cα⁢(n,j)⁢rj⁢∑n=0∞1n!⁢(4⁢tr2)n(t→0+), (10)

where

Cα⁢(n,j)=∑i=0j(−1)j−i⁢(ji)⁢(i2)n¯⁢(α+i2)n¯. (11)
Proof.

Since ψrj⁢(s)=∑i=0j(ji)⁢(−r)j−i⁢ei⁢(s), based on relation (9) we can write

Wα⁢(ψrj;r,t)∼∑i=0j(ji)⁢(−r)j−i⁢ri⁢∑n=0∞1n!⁢(i2)n¯⁢(α+i2)n¯⁢(4⁢tr2)n(t→0+).

Using the coefficients defined in (11) we arrive at (10). ∎

Remark. Examining the coefficients Cα⁢(n,j), j∈ℕ0, we notice that they can be written as follows

Cα⁢(n,j) =∑i=0j(−1)j−i⁢(ji)⁢(∂∂w)n⁢[wn+α⁢(∂∂w)n⁢wi/2]|w=1
=(∂∂w)n⁢[wn+α⁢(∂∂w)n⁢(w−1)j]|w=1. (12)

The following theorem is our main result. It presents a complete asymptotic expansion of the operators Wα⁢(f;r,t) as t→0+, for functions f∈E being sufficiently smooth at a point r>0.

Theorem 3.

Let Wα be defined by (4) and r>0,q∈ℕ be given. If f∈E is q times differentiable at r, then

Wα⁢(f;r,t)=∑n=0q1n!⁢(4⁢tr2)n⁢∑j=02⁢qf(j)⁢(r)j!⁢rj⁢Cα⁢(n,j)+o⁢(tq)(t→0+), (13)

where the coefficients Cα⁢(n,j), j=0,…,2⁢q, are defined at (11).

If f is a real analytic function, then

Wα⁢(f;r,t)∼∑n=0∞cn⁢(α,f,r)⁢tn(t→0+), (14)

where

cn⁢(α,f,r)=4nn!⁢r2⁢n⁢(∂∂w)n⁢[wn+α⁢(∂∂w)n⁢f⁢(r⁢w)]|w=1. (15)
Proof.

Let r>0 and put Uδ⁢(r)=(r−δ,r+δ)∩[0,+∞), for δ>0. Let δ>0 be given. Choose a function φ∈C∞⁢([0,+∞)) with φ⁢(x)=1 on Uδ⁢(r) and φ⁢(x)=0 on [0,+∞)∖U2⁢δ⁢(r). Put f~=φ⁢f. Then we have f~≡f on Uδ⁢(r) and f~≡0 on [0,+∞)∖U3⁢δ⁢(r). In particular f(2⁢q)⁢(r)=f~(2⁢q)⁢(r). By the localization theorem (Theorem 5), Wα⁢(f−f~;r,t) deceases exponentially fast as t→0+. Consequently, f~ and f possess the same asymptotic expansion of the form (13). Therefore, without loss of generality, we can assume that f≡0 on [0,+∞)∖U3⁢δ⁢(r). By Lemma 2, we have Wα⁢(ψr2⁢s;r,t)=O⁢(ts) as t→0+. Under these conditions, a general approximation theorem due to Sikkema [15, Theorem 3] implies that

Wα⁢(f;r,t)=∑j=02⁢qf(j)⁢(r)j!⁢Wα⁢(ψrj;r,t)+o⁢(tq),

see [15, Eq. (15)]. Taking in view (10), identity (13) is proved.

If f is a real analytic function we have the possibility to write

f⁢(r⁢w)=∑j≥0f(j)⁢(r)j!⁢(r⁢w−r)j,w>0.

Further, with the help of (3), formula (13) can be rewritten in the form

Wα⁢(f;r,t)
=∑n=0q1n!⁢(4⁢tr2)n⁢(∂∂w)n⁢[wn+α⁢(∂∂w)n⁢f⁢(r⁢w)]|w=1+o⁢(tq)(t→0+).

Consequently we get

Wα⁢(f;r,t)∼∑n=0∞1n!⁢(4⁢tr2)n⁢(∂∂w)n⁢[wn+α⁢(∂∂w)n⁢f⁢(r⁢w)]|w=1(t→0+)

and (14) is substantiated. ∎

Applying formula (15) to find the first four coefficients of asymptotic expansion, we obtain the following values:

c0⁢(α,f,r) =f⁢(r),
c1⁢(α,f,r) =2⁢α+1r⁢f′⁢(r)+f′′⁢(r),
c2⁢(α,f,r) =1−4⁢α22⁢r3⁢f′⁢(r)+4⁢α2−12⁢r2⁢f′′⁢(r)+2⁢α+1r⁢f′′′⁢(r)+12⁢f(4)⁢(r),
c3⁢(α,f,r) =(4⁢α2−1)⁢(2⁢α−32⁢r5⁢f′⁢(r)−2⁢α−32⁢r4⁢f′′⁢(r)+α−33⁢r3⁢f′′′⁢(r)+12⁢r2⁢f(4)⁢(r))
+2⁢α+12⁢r⁢f(5)⁢(r)+16⁢f(6)⁢(r).

For the special case α=−1/2 (nearly Gauss–Weierstrass operator, see (6)) the respective coefficients become

c0⁢(−1/2,f,r)=f⁢(r),c1⁢(−1/2,f,r)=f′′⁢(r),c2⁢(−1/2,f,r)=12⁢f(4)⁢(r),c3⁢(−1/2,f,r)=16⁢f(6)⁢(r).

We have the following representation of the coefficients in the asymptotic expansion (cf. [3, Eq. (1.5)]).

Proposition 4.

For α=−1/2 it holds

cn⁢(−1/2,f,r)=1n!⁢f(2⁢n)⁢(r)
Proof.

Since the formula is of algebraic form it is sufficient to prove it for polynomial functions f. For f=ei, we have

cn⁢(−1/2,ei,r) = 4nn!⁢r2⁢n⁢(∂∂w)n⁢[wn−1/2⁢(∂∂w)n⁢(r⁢w)i]|w=1
= 4n⁢rin!⁢r2⁢n⁢(i2)n¯⁢(∂∂w)n⁢wi/2−1/2|w=1
= 4n⁢ri−2⁢nn!⁢(i2)n¯⁢(i−12)n¯
= 4n⁢ri−2⁢nn!⁢i2⁢i−12⁢i−22⁢i−32⁢⋯⁢i−2⁢n+22⁢i−2⁢n+12
= 1n!⁢i2⁢n¯⁢ri−2⁢n=1n!⁢ei(2⁢n)⁢(r).

∎

At the end of this section it is worth mentioning that the first author obtained asymptotic expansions for various classes of approximation linear positive operators, see, e.g., [1], [2], as well as [3], [4].

4. Localization result

The purpose of this paragraph is to characterize the function Wα⁢f according to its growth rate, where f∈EK has a specific property which means that it vanishes in a neighborhood of a fixed value r>0. For the modified Bessel function defined by (2), Luke [13, Eq. (6.25)] proved the estimate

1<Γ⁢(α+1)⁢(2z)α⁢Iα⁢(z)<cosh⁡(z),z>0,α>−12. (16)

We emphasize that Ifantis and Siafarikas [11, Eq. (2.1)] gave more general bounds

(xy)α⁢cosh⁡(x)cosh⁡(y)<Iα⁢(x)Iα⁢(y)<(cosh⁡(x)cosh⁡(y))1/(2⁢α+2), 0<x<y,α>−12. (17)

From (2) is immediately deduced

limx→0+x−α⁢Iα⁢(x)=2−αΓ⁢(α+1)

and in this way, out of (17), inequalities (16) can be reobtained.

Knowing the particular value of I−1/2⁢(z), see (3), from the previous relations we can finally write

Iα⁢(z)≤L⁢(α)⁢zα⁢ez,z>0,α≥−1/2, (18)

where L⁢(α)=2−α/Γ⁢(α+1).

The following localization result has already been applied in the proof of Theorem 3. It is interesting in itself.

Theorem 5.

Let Wα be defined by (4). Let r>0, δ>0 be fixed. We consider the function f∈EK satisfying the condition

f⁢(s)=0,s∈(r−δ,r+δ)∩[0,∞).

Then, it holds

Wα⁢(f;r,t)=𝒪⁢(exp⁡(−δ24⁢t))(t→0+). (19)
Proof.

By (18), we have

0 ≤exp⁡(−r2+s24⁢t)⁢Iα⁢(r⁢s2⁢t)
≤L⁢(α)⁢exp⁡(−r2+s24⁢t)⁢(r⁢s2⁢t)α⁢exp⁡(r⁢s2⁢t)
=L⁢(α)⁢(r⁢s2⁢t)α⁢exp⁡(−(s−t)24⁢t).

Considering the conditions verified by the function f, we obtain

|Wα⁢(f;r,t)|≤M⁢L⁢(α)(2⁢t)α+1⁢(I1+I2), (20)

where

I1 :=∫0max⁡{0,r−δ}s2⁢α+1⁢exp⁡(−(s−r)24⁢t)⁢eK⁢s2⁢𝑑s,
I2 :=∫r+δ∞s2⁢α+1⁢exp⁡(−(s−r)24⁢t)⁢eK⁢s2⁢𝑑s.

At first we estimate I2. A change of variable leads to

I2=∫δ∞(s+r)2⁢α+1⁢exp⁡(−s24⁢t+K⁢(s+r)2)⁢𝑑s.

Next we consider t>0 small enough, for example t<(8⁢K)−1.

For each m>1, the derivative

∂∂s⁢[(s+r)m⁢exp⁡(−s24⁢t+K⁢(s+r)2)]
=[m+(s+r)⁢(−2⁢s4⁢t+2⁢K⁢(s+r))]⁢(s+r)m−1⁢exp⁡(−s24⁢t+K⁢(s+r)2) (21)

has a unique positive zero, say s⁢(t), where

s⁢(t)=12⁢(4⁢K⁢t−1)−1⁢(r−8⁢K⁢r⁢t−((8⁢K⁢r⁢t−r)2−8⁢(4⁢K⁢t−1)⁢(2⁢K⁢r2+m)⁢t)1/2).

As a function of t, s⁢(t) tends to 0 when t→0+. Therefore, we can assume that 0<s⁢(t)<δ. Relation (4) and the above statements imply that the function hr,

hr⁢(s)=(s+r)2⁢α+1⁢exp⁡(−s24⁢t+K⁢(s+r)2)

is monotonically decreasing. Consequently, for s≥δ we have

I2 ≤(δ+r)2⁢α+3⁢exp⁡(−δ24⁢t+K⁢(δ+r)2)⁢∫δ∞(s+r)−2⁢𝑑s
=(δ+r)2⁢α+2⁢exp⁡(K⁢(δ+r)2)⁢exp⁡(−δ24⁢t)
=𝒪⁢(exp⁡(−δ24⁢t))(t→0+).

We turn to the integral I1. In the case r≤δ there is nothing to prove. If r>δ, we have

I1≤(r−δ)⁢(r−δ)2⁢α+1⁢max0≤s≤r−δ⁡exp⁡(−(s−r)24⁢t+K⁢s2).

Because −(s−r)2≤−δ2, for 0≤s≤r−δ, we infer that

I1≤r2⁢α+2⁢eK⁢r2⁢exp⁡(−δ24⁢t).

Combining the estimates of the integrals I1 and I2, from (20) the statement (19) is proved. ∎

We note that Wachnicki [16, Lemma 2 and Lemma 3] showed that

limt→0+∫0r−δKα⁢(r,s,t)⁢eK⁢s2⁢𝑑s=0

uniformly on r∈[α,β], for 0<α<δ<β, and

limt→0+∫r+δ+∞Kα⁢(r,s,t)⁢eK⁢s2⁢𝑑s=0

uniformly on r∈(0,β], for β>0, which implies the weaker estimate

Wα⁢(f;r,t)=o⁢(1)⁢ ⁢(t→0+).

References

  • [1] Abel, U., A Voronovskaya type result for simultaneous approximation by Bernstein–Chlodovsky polynomials, Results Math., 74(2019), Article number 117.
  • [2] Abel, U., Voronovskaja type theorems for positive linear operators related to squared fundamental functions, In: Constructive Theory of Functions, Sozopol 2019 (B. Draganov, K. Ivanov, G. Nikolov and R. Uluchev, Eds.), pp. 1-21, Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bas, Sofia, 2020.
  • [3] Abel, U., Agratini, O., Păltănea, R., A complete asymptotic expansion for the quasi-interpolants of Gauss–Weierstrass operators, Mediterr. J. Math., 15(2018), Article number 156.
  • [4] Abel, U., Karsli, H., A complete asymptotic expansion for Bernstein-Chodovsky polynomials for functions on ℝ, Mediterr. J. Math., 17(2020), Article number 201.
  • [5] Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series 55, Issued June 1964, Tenth Printing, December 1972, with corrections.
  • [6] Altomare, F., Campiti, M., Korovkin-type Approximation Theory and its Applications, de Gruyter Series Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 17, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, New York, 1994.
  • [7] Altomare, F., Sabina, M., Integral-type operators on continuous function spaces on the real line, J. Approx. Theory, 152(2008), no. 2, 107-124.
  • [8] Aral, A., Gal, S.G., q-Generalizations of the Picard and Gauss–Weierstrass singular integrals, Taiwanese J. Math., 12(2008), No. 9, 2051–2515.
  • [9] Bardaro, C., Mantellini, I., Uysal, G., Yilmaz, B., A class of integral operators that fix exponential functions, Mediterr. J. Math., 18(2021), Article number 179.
  • [10] Bragg, L. R., The radial heat polynomials and related functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 119(1965), 270–290.
  • [11] Ifantis, E.K., Siafarikas, P.D., Bounds for modified Bessel functions, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, Serie II, 40(1991), No. 3, 347–356.
  • [12] Krech, G., Krech, I., On some bivariate Gauss–Weierstrass operators, Constr. Math. Anal., 2(2019), No. 2, 57–63.
  • [13] Luke, Y.L., Inequalities for generalized hypergeometric functions, J. Approx. Theory, 5(1972), 41–65.
  • [14] Rosenbloom, P., Widder, D. V., Expansions in heat polynomials and associated functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 92(1959), 220–266
  • [15] Sikkema, P.C., On some linear positive operators, Indag. Math., 32(1970), 327–337.
  • [16] Wachnicki, E., On a Gauss–Weierstrass generalized integral, Rocznik Naukowo-Dydaktyczny Akademii Pedagogícznej W Krakowie, Prace Matematyczne, 17(2000), 251–263.
  • [17] Yilmaz, B., Approximation properties of modified Gauss–Weierstrass integral operators in exponential weighted Lp spaces, Facta Universitas (Nis̆), Ser. Math. Inform., 36(2021), No. 1, 89–100.
  • [18] Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov

[1] Abel, U.: A Voronovskaya type result for simultaneous approximation by Bernstein–Chlodovsky polynomials. Results Math. 74, Article number 117 (2019) Google Scholar
[2] Abel, U.: Voronovskaja type theorems for positive linear operators related to squared fundamental functions. In: Draganov, B., Ivanov, K., Nikolov, G., Uluchev, R. (eds.) Constructive Theory of Functions, Sozopol 2019, pp. 1–21. Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bas, Sofia (2020) Google Scholar
[3] Abel, U., Ivan, M.: Simultaneous approximation by Altomare operators. Suppl. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 82(2), 177–193 (2010) MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[4] Abel, U., Ivan, M.: Complete asymptotic expansions for Altomare operators. Mediterr. J. Math. 10, 17–29 (2013) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[5] Abel, U., Karsli, H.: A complete asymptotic expansion for Bernstein-Chodovsky polynomials for functions on R. Mediterr. J. Math., 17, Article number 201 (2020) Google Scholar
[6] Abel, U., Agratini, O., Păltănea, R.: A complete asymptotic expansion for the quasi-interpolants of Gauss–Weierstrass operators. Mediterr. J. Math. 15, Article number 156 (2018) Google Scholar
[7] Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A. (eds.): Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55. Tenth Printing (Issued, June 1964) (With corrections, December 1972) Google Scholar
[8] Altomare, F., Campiti, M.: Korovkin-type Approximation Theory and its Applications. de Gruyter Series Studies in Mathematics, vol. 17. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York (1994) Google Scholar
[9] Altomare, F., Milella, S.: Integral-type operators on continuous function spaces on the real line. J. Approx. Theory 152(2), 107–124 (2008) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[10] Aral, A., Gal, S.G.: q-Generalizations of the Picard and Gauss–Weierstrass singular integrals. Taiwanese J. Math. 12(9), 2051–2515 (2008) Google Scholar
[11] Bardaro, C., Mantellini, I., Uysal, G., Yilmaz, B.: A class of integral operators that fix exponential functions. Mediterr. J. Math. 18, Article number 179 (2021) Google Scholar
[12] Bragg, L.R.: The radial heat polynomials and related functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 119, 270–290 (1965) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[13] Ifantis, E.K., Siafarikas, P.D.: Bounds for modified Bessel functions. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo II 40(3), 347–356 (1991) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[14] Krech, G., Krech, I.: On some bivariate Gauss–Weierstrass operators. Constr. Math. Anal. 2(2), 57–63 (2019) MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[15] Luke, Y.L.: Inequalities for generalized hypergeometric functions. J. Approx. Theory, 5, 41–65 (1972) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[16] NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. F. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds. https://dlmf.nist.gov
[17] Rosenbloom, P., Widder, D. V.: Expansions in heat polynomials and associated functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 92, 220–266 (1959) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[18]  Sikkema, P.C.: On some linear positive operators. Ind. Math. 32, 327–337 (1970) CrossRef MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[19]  Wachnicki, E.: On a Gauss–Weierstrass generalized integral. Rocznik Nauk.-Dydakt. Akad. Pedagogícznej W Krakow. Prace Mat. 17(2000), 251–263 MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
[20]  Yilmaz, B.: Approximation properties of modified Gauss–Weierstrass integral operators in exponential weighted Lp spaces. Facta Univ. (Nis̆) Ser. Math. Inform. 36(1), 89–100 (2021)

2023

Related Posts