1972-Nemeth-Triangles inscribed in smooth closed arcs
TRIANGLES INSCRIBED IN SMOOTH CLOSED ARCS
by
HORST KRAMER and A. B. NEMETH
(Cluj)
Concerning a more general problem stated by p. TURAN (see in [2]), E. G. STRAUS has proved the following theorem (unpublished):
Given any continuum Sigma(=\Sigma(= compact connected set )) in the Euclidean plane R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}, such that for some triangle ABCA B C in the plane no three points A^('),B^('),C^(')A^{\prime}, B^{\prime}, C^{\prime} in Sigma\Sigma form a triangle similar to ABCA B C, then Sigma\Sigma is a simple arc.
From this theorem in particular follows that if Gamma\Gamma is a closed arc, then there exists a triangle A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime} similar to ABCA B C, which is inscribed in Gamma\Gamma in the sense that A^('),B^('),C^(')in GammaA^{\prime}, B^{\prime}, C^{\prime} \in \Gamma.
We ask now about the existence of a triangle A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime} inscribed in the closed arc Gamma\Gamma, which has parallel sides with the sides of the triangle ABCA B C and the same orientation. This special case appears in some problems in the geometry of convex sets (see our notes [1] and [2]). The answer in general may be negative. In our note we solve this problem in the special case when Gamma\Gamma is a closed arc of class C^(1)C^{1} and has additional conditions about its tangent lines. From our theorem we derive a characterization of the strictly convex closed arcs of the class C^(1)C^{1}.
Le mm a 1. Let be Omega\Omega the strip formed by the points (x,y)(x, y) of the Euclidean plane R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2} with a <= x <= b(a < b)a \leqq x \leqq b(a<b). Denote by Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} two simple arcs of the class C^(1)C^{1} in Omega\Omega, with disjoint interiors, having the parametric representations given by
Gamma^('){[x=varphi(t^('))],[y=psi(t^('))]t^(')in[0,1]," and "Gamma^(''){[x=xi(t^(''))],[y=eta(t^(''))]t^('')in[0,1]:}\Gamma^{\prime}\left\{\begin{array} { l }
{ x = \varphi ( t ^ { \prime } ) } \\
{ y = \psi ( t ^ { \prime } ) }
\end{array} t ^ { \prime } \in [ 0 , 1 ] , \text { and } \Gamma ^ { \prime \prime } \left\{\begin{array}{l}
x=\xi\left(t^{\prime \prime}\right) \\
y=\eta\left(t^{\prime \prime}\right)
\end{array} t^{\prime \prime} \in[0,1]\right.\right.
and suppose that varphi(0)=xi(0)=a\varphi(0)=\xi(0)=a and varphi(1)=xi(1)=b\varphi(1)=\xi(1)=b. Suppose that Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} have a finite number of points in which the tangent is parallel to OyO y
and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line. Then:
(i) There exists a set of segments T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t) with the endpoints T^(')(t)inGamma^(')T^{\prime}(t) \in \Gamma^{\prime} and T^('')(t)inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime}(t) \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}, depending continuously on the parameter t in[0,1]t \in[0,1], such that for any tt the segment is parallel to OyO y and T^(')(0)=(varphi(0),psi(0)),T^(')(1)==(varphi(1),psi(1))T^{\prime}(0)=(\varphi(0), \psi(0)), T^{\prime}(1)= =(\varphi(1), \psi(1)) and T^('')(0)=(xi(0),eta(0)),T^('')(1)=(xi(1),eta(1))T^{\prime \prime}(0)=(\xi(0), \eta(0)), T^{\prime \prime}(1)=(\xi(1), \eta(1)).
(ii) If T^(')inGamma^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime} is arbitrary, then there exists a point T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime} such that T^(')=T^(')(t)T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}(t) and T^('')=T^('')(t)T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}(t) for some tt in [0,1][0,1].
(iii) There exist neighbourhoods U^(')U^{\prime} and U^('')U^{\prime \prime} of T^(')(0)T^{\prime}(0) and T^('')(0)T^{\prime \prime}(0), such that if T^(')inGamma^(')nnU^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime} \cap U^{\prime} and T^('')inGamma^('')nnU^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime} \cap U^{\prime \prime} and T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} is parallel to OyO y, then there exists a tt such that T^(')=T^(')(t)T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}(t) and T^('')=T^('')(t)T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}(t).
Proof. We proceed by induction on the number mm of points of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} (different from their endpoints), in which the tangent is parallel to OyO y and in the neighbourhood of which the ares are on the same side of the tangent lines. (The number of these points is obviously even.)
Suppose that m=0m=0. In this case the arcs Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} may be represented in the form
Gamma^('):y=f(x)" and "Gamma^(''):y=g(x).\Gamma^{\prime}: y=f(x) \text { and } \Gamma^{\prime \prime}: y=g(x) .
Then the set of segments T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t) where t=(x-a)/(b-a)t=\frac{x-a}{b-a} and
satisfies all the conditions of the lemma.
Suppose that the lemma holds for m <= 2nm \leq 2 n and prove it for m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1).
Let be T_(k)^(')inGamma^(')T_{k}^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}, the point in which the tangent is parallel to OyO y and has the minimal abscissa relative to all the points with this property in the interior of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}. Suppose that T_(k)^(')=(varphi(t_(k)^(')),psi(t_(k)^(')))T_{k}^{\prime}=\left(\varphi\left(t_{k}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{k}^{\prime}\right)\right) and let be T_(i)^(')==(varphi(t_(i)^(')),psi(t_(i)^('))),i=1,dots,k rarr1T_{i}^{\prime}= =\left(\varphi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right)\right), i=1, \ldots, k \rightarrow 1 all the points with t_(i)^(') < t_(k)^(')t_{i}^{\prime}<t_{k}^{\prime}, and with the property that the tangents to Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} are parallel to OyO y. Suppose that T_(i)^(')==(varphi(t_(l)^(')),psi(t_(l)^('))),1 <= l <= k-1T_{i}^{\prime}= =\left(\varphi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right), \psi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right)\right), 1 \leqq l \leqq k-1 is a point with the maximal abscissa relative to the set of points T_(i)^('),i=1,dots,k-1T_{i}^{\prime}, i=1, \ldots, k-1, (see Fig. 1). For i <= ki \leq k we shall denote by t_(i)^('')t_{i}^{\prime \prime} the minimal value of t^('')t^{\prime \prime} with the property that xi(t_(i)^(''))=varphi(t_(i)^('))\xi\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right)=\varphi\left(t_{i}^{\prime}\right). Put T_(i)^('')=(xi(t_(i)^('')),eta(t_(i)^('')))T_{i}^{\prime \prime}=\left(\xi\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right), \eta\left(t_{i}^{\prime \prime}\right)\right). Then the segments T_(i)^(')T_(i)^(''),i=1,dots,kT_{i}^{\prime} T_{i}^{\prime \prime}, i=1, \ldots, k are parallel to Oy.
Consider now the strip a <= x <= varphi(t_(l)^('))a \leqq x \leqq \varphi\left(t_{l}^{\prime}\right), and the part Gamma_(1)^(')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime} of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} for 0≦≤t^(') <= t_(i)^(')0 \leqq \leq t^{\prime} \leqq t_{i}^{\prime} and the part Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime} of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} for 0 <= t^('') <= t_(l)^('')0 \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq t_{l}^{\prime \prime}. The number of points on Gamma_(1)^(')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime} and Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime} in which the tangents are parallel to OyO y is <= 2n\leq 2 n, because two such points, the point T_(k)^(')T_{k}^{\prime} and T_(l)^(')T_{l}^{\prime}, are eliminated ( T_(k)^(')T_{k}^{\prime} is eliminated because t^(') > t_(1)^(')t^{\prime}>t_{1}^{\prime} and then T^(')!inGamma_(1)^(')T^{\prime} \notin \Gamma_{1}^{\prime} and T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime} is eliminated { } is bes T_(k) > T_(l)T_{k}>T_{l} and T_(l)T_{l} is eliminated because it is an endpoint of Gamma_(1)\Gamma_{1}.) By the induction hypothesis there exists then the set of segments T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t) with the propeties (i), (ii) and (iii) with respect to the arcsGamma_(1)^(')\operatorname{arcs} \Gamma_{1}^{\prime} and Gamma_(1)^('')\Gamma_{1}^{\prime \prime}.
By a similar way may be seen the existence of a set of segments T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t) with the properties (i), (ii) and (iii) for the parts Gamma_(2)^(')\Gamma_{2}^{\prime} of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} for
Fig. 1.
t_(l)^(') <= t^(') <= t_(k)^(')t_{l}^{\prime} \leqq t^{\prime} \leqq t_{k}^{\prime} and Gamma_(2)^('')\Gamma_{2}^{\prime \prime} of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} for t_(k)^('') <= t^('') <= t_(l)^('')t_{k}^{\prime \prime} \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq t_{l}^{\prime \prime}. (Here we have t_(k)^('') < t_(l)^(')t_{k}^{\prime \prime}<t_{l}^{\prime}, from the definition of the points T_(k)^('')T_{k}^{\prime \prime} and T_(l)^('')T_{l}^{\prime \prime}, because xi(t_(k)^('')) < xi(t_(l)^(''))\xi\left(t_{k}^{\prime \prime}\right)<\xi\left(t_{l}^{\prime \prime}\right).)
We may consider now the part Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma_(3)^('')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime \prime} of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} for t_(k)^(') <= t^(') <= 1t_{k}^{\prime} \leqq t^{\prime} \leqq 1 and t_(k)^('') <= t^('') <= 1t_{k}^{\prime \prime} \leqq t^{\prime \prime} \leqq 1 respectively, and apply the induction hypothesis for Gamma_(3)^(')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime} and Gamma_(3)^('')\Gamma_{3}^{\prime \prime}.
As a final step, by a simple joining of the obtained families of segments T^(')(t)T^('')(t)T^{\prime}(t) T^{\prime \prime}(t) we obtain a family of segments which completes the proof of the assertion for m=2(n+1)m=2(n+1). This completes the proof of the lemma.
theorem 1. Let be ABC a triangle in the Euclidean plane R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}. Suppose that Gamma\Gamma is a simple closed arc of class C^(1)C^{1} in R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}, which has the property that for at least one of the sides of ABCA B C there is a finite number of points of Gamma\Gamma, in which the tangents are parallel to the respective side and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line. Then there exists a triangle A^(')B^(')C^(')A^{\prime} B^{\prime} C^{\prime} with sides parallel to sides of ABCA B C and of the same orientation as ABCA B C, which is inscribed in Gamma\Gamma, in the sense that A^(')A^{\prime}, B^('),C^(')in GammaB^{\prime}, C^{\prime} \in \Gamma.
Proof. Suppose that BCB C is the side for which there are a finite number of points in which Gamma\Gamma has tangents parallel to BCB C and in the neighbourhood of which the arc is on the same side of the tangent line, and let BCB C be parallel to OyO y. Let be aa and b,a < bb, a<b the minimum, respective the maximum of abscissas of the points in which Gamma\Gamma has tangents parallel to OyO y. Denote by Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime} and Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime} the lines x=ax=a, respectively x=bx=b and let be P^(')inDelta^(')nn GammaP^{\prime} \in \Delta^{\prime} \cap \Gamma and P^('')inDelta^('')nn GammaP^{\prime \prime} \in \Delta^{\prime \prime} \cap \Gamma. The points P^(')P^{\prime} and P^('')P^{\prime \prime} divide the are Gamma\Gamma in two ares: Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime}.
Consider now the triangle ABCA B C and let be DD the foot of the perpendicular from AA to the supporting line of BCB C. Then D=qB+(1-q)CD=q B+(1-q) C for a given number qq. Denote by rr the vector A-DA-D. Then A=D+rA=D+r.
Let be T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} a segment parallel to BCB C. The triangle TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} having parallel sides with the sides of ABCA B C and the same orientation, may be determined by putting
We proceed now to construction of an arc gamma\gamma in the following way:
According to Lemma 1, the segment T^(')(0)T^('')(0)(=P^('))T^{\prime}(0) T^{\prime \prime}(0)\left(=P^{\prime}\right) can be moved continuously to T^(')(1)T^('')(1)(=P^(''))T^{\prime}(1) T^{\prime \prime}(1)\left(=P^{\prime \prime}\right) such that all the intermediate positions are segments T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} parallel to OyO y, and T^(')inGamma^('),T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime}, T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime}. Consider this family of segments T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} depending continuously on the parameter t∈∈[0,1]t \in \in[0,1], i.e. suppose that the endpoints T^(')T^{\prime} and T^('')T^{\prime \prime} depends continuously on tt. Then by (1), TT depends continuously on tt. Denote
gamma={T(t):t in[0,1]}.\gamma=\{T(t): t \in[0,1]\} .
We have obviously gamma(0)=T(0)=P^(')\gamma(0)=T(0)=P^{\prime} and gamma(1)=T(1)=P^('')\gamma(1)=T(1)=P^{\prime \prime}.
According to the theorem of Jordan, Gamma\Gamma determines two domains of R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}, which we will call the "inside" and the „outside" of Gamma\Gamma. In what follows we shall prove that there exists a value t_(0)t_{0} in (0,1)(0,1) such that T(t_(0))T\left(t_{0}\right) is inside and a value t_(1)t_{1} in (0,1)(0,1) such that T(t_(1))T\left(t_{1}\right) is outside Gamma\Gamma.
We observe that from the condition of the theorem it follows that P^(')P^{\prime} is an isolated point with the property that the tangent to Gamma\Gamma is parallel to OyO y. Let be T^(')T^{\prime} a point on Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and let be T^('')T^{\prime \prime} the point on Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} with minimal value of the parameter t^('')t^{\prime \prime} such that T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} is parallel to OyO y. Let be T^('')R^(')T^{\prime \prime} R^{\prime} and T^(')R^('')T^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime} the segments parallel to CAC A and BAB A respectively. Letting T^(')rarrP^(')T^{\prime} \rightarrow P^{\prime}, the segment T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} tends to P^(')P^{\prime}. From the property that Gamma\Gamma is of class C^(1)C^{1}, it follows that the parallel line in P^(')P^{\prime} to BAB A will intersect Gamma\Gamma in a point. Denote by Q^('')Q^{\prime \prime} the nearest point to P^(')P^{\prime} with this property. Then the open segment P^(')Q^('')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime \prime} will be inside Gamma\Gamma. Similarly, let P^(')Q^(')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime} be the segment with the same property, parallel to CAC A. Let be T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime} a point on Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and denote by T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime \prime} the point on Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} with minimal value of the parameter t^('')t^{\prime \prime}, such that T_(1)^(')T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime} T_{1}^{\prime \prime} is parallel te OyO y. Suppose that the abscissa of T_(1)^(') <=T_{1}^{\prime} \leqq minimum of the abscissas of Q^(')Q^{\prime} and Q^('')Q^{\prime \prime}. Then T_(1)^(')T_(1)^('')T_{1}^{\prime} T_{1}^{\prime \prime} will intersect P^(')Q^(')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime} in R^(')R^{\prime} and P^(')Q^('')P^{\prime} Q^{\prime \prime} in R^('')R^{\prime \prime}. Because Gamma\Gamma is a simple closed arc, for T_(1)^(')T_{1}^{\prime} sufficiently near
Fig. 2.
to P^(')P^{\prime} the triangle R^(')P^(')R^('')R^{\prime} P^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime} will be inside Gamma\Gamma. Consider a point SS inside this triangle and let T_(0)^(')T_{0}^{\prime} be the intersection point of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} and the parallel line in SS to BAB A having the minimal value of the parameter t^(')t^{\prime}, and respectively, let T_(0)^('')T_{0}^{\prime \prime} be the intersection of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} and the parallel line in SS to CAC A, with the minimum value of the parameter t^('')t^{\prime \prime}. Suppose that the abscissa of T_(0)^(') <=T_{0}^{\prime} \leq than the abscissa of T_(0)^('')T_{0}^{\prime \prime}. Put T^(')=T_(0)^(')T^{\prime}=T_{0}^{\prime} and denote by T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} the segment parallel to OyO y with T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime} being the point with the minimal value of the parameter t^('')t^{\prime \prime} with this property (see Fig. 2). T^('')T^{\prime \prime} will be obviously ,,above" the line T_(0)^('')ST_{0}^{\prime \prime} S, and therefore the point TT defined by (1) will be inside the triangle R^(')P^(')R^('')R^{\prime} P^{\prime} R^{\prime \prime} and therefore TT is also inside Gamma\Gamma. According (iii) in Lemma 1 it follows that for T^(')T^{\prime} and T^('')T^{\prime \prime} sufficiently near to P^(')P^{\prime}, there exists a value t_(0)t_{0} of the parameter tt such that T^(')=T^(')(t_(0)),T^('')=T^('')(t_(0))T^{\prime}=T^{\prime}\left(t_{0}\right), T^{\prime \prime}=T^{\prime \prime}\left(t_{0}\right) and therefore T=T(t_(0))T=T\left(t_{0}\right).
Denote by Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime} and Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime} the supporting lines of the convex hull Co(Gamma)\mathrm{Co}(\Gamma) of Gamma\Gamma, parallel with BAB A and CAC A respectively, such that their intersection
fig. 4.
Fig. 3.
point UU has the abscissa > b>b (see Fig. 3). Denote by U^(')U^{\prime} the point of Gamma^(')\Gamma^{\prime} on Delta^(')\Delta^{\prime} nearest to UU and by U^('')U^{\prime \prime} the point of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} on Delta^('')\Delta^{\prime \prime} nearest to UU. Suppose that the abscissa of U^(') >U^{\prime}> than the abscissa of U^('')U^{\prime \prime}. Put U^(')=T^(')U^{\prime}=T^{\prime} and let be T^('')T^{\prime \prime} a point of Gamma^('')\Gamma^{\prime \prime} such that T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} occurs in the construct a parameter t_(1)t_{1} such that T^(')T^{\prime} The point T=T(t_(1))T=T\left(t_{1}\right) defined by (1) will T^(')UT^{\prime} U is outside Gamma\Gamma (excepting T^(')T^{\prime} ), T(t)T(t) on T^(')UT^{\prime} U, and be
(exceptiows that (l_(1))\left(l_{1}\right) will be outside Gamma\Gamma.
It fon. Denote by TT an intersection point. Then from the definition of it will follow that there exist the points T^(')inGamma^(')T^{\prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime} and T^('')inGamma^('')T^{\prime \prime} \in \Gamma^{\prime \prime} such of the triangle TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} has the required property. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Remark. A special interest presents for us the case when Gamma\Gamma in Theorem 1 is a convex curve. Then an other proof may be given, which makes use of Brouwer's fixed point theorem. In this case our theorem follows from the more general Theorem 1 in the paper [1] (or [2]).
THEOREM 2. Let be ABC a triangle in the Euclidean plane R^(2)\mathbf{R}^{2}. Suppose that Gamma\Gamma is a strictly convex, closed arc of class C^(1)C^{1}. Then there exists a single triangle A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} with sides parallel to sides of ABCA B C and of the same orientation as ABCA B C, and which is inscribed in Gamma\Gamma, in the sense that A_(1),B_(1),C_(1)in GammaA_{1}, B_{1}, C_{1} \in \Gamma.
Proof. The existence of a triangle A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} with the required properties follows from the Theorem 1. It remains to show the unicity.
Suppose that A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} and A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2} are two triangles with parallel sides and with the same orientation. Then one of their vertices is contained in the convex hull of the other five. Consider the supporting lines of A_(1)B_(1)A_{1} B_{1} and A_(2)B_(2)A_{2} B_{2}. Because A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} and A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2} have the same orientation, one of these lines, say A_(i)B_(i)(i=1A_{i} B_{i}(i=1 or 2)) determines a closed halfplane which contains both triangles. By the same reasoning there is a jj and a k(j=1k(j=1
or 2 and k=1k=1 or 2 ) such that the supporting line of B_(j)C_(j)B_{j} C_{j} and the supporting line of C_(k)A_(k)C_{k} A_{k} have the same property. Then two indices of i,j,ki, j, k coincides, say i=j=1i=j=1 and one of the possible situations is that in Fig. 4. It follows that B_(2)B_{2} is in the convex hull of the vertices A_(1),B_(1),C_(1),A_(2),C_(2)A_{1}, B_{1}, C_{1}, A_{2}, C_{2}. It is easy to see that in any other relative positions of A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} and A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2} a similar conclusion holds.
If we suppose now that A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} and A_(2)B_(2)C_(2)A_{2} B_{2} C_{2} are two triangles inscribed in F with sides parallel to the sides of ABCA B C and having the same orientation, then we get a contradiction with the hypothesis that Gamma\Gamma is strictly convex.
theorem 3. If Gamma\Gamma is a simple closed arc of class C^(1)C^{1} with the property that for any direction it has a finite number of tangents parallel to this direction, and for any triangle ABCA B C there exists a single triangle A_(1)B_(1)C_(1)A_{1} B_{1} C_{1} inscribed in Gamma\Gamma having his sides parallel to the sides of ABCA B C and the same orientation as ABCA B C, then Gamma\Gamma is a strictly convex arc.
Proof. Suppose that Gamma\Gamma is not strictly convex. Then there exists a segment which intersects Gamma\Gamma in the points P_(1),P_(2)P_{1}, P_{2} and P_(3)P_{3}. Without loss of generality we may suppose that we have the situation in Fig. 5. Because P_(1),P_(2),P_(3)P_{1}, P_{2}, P_{3} are isolated intersection points of Gamma\Gamma and P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3} (this follows from the hypothesis that Gamma\Gamma has a finite number of points in which the tangent P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3} ), we may suppose that P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3} is not tangent to to PP is parallel PP Then there exists a segment P,QP, Q which is inside the I in the point P_(1)P_{1}. The segment P,P_(2)P, P_{2} and 12 poin Gamma\Gamma die closed arc Omega\Omega formed by PRP R, 1_(2)1_{2}. Gamma\Gamma from P_(1)P_{1} to P_(2)P_{2} (see Fig. 5). Let be P_(2)RP_{2} R paral P_(3)QP_{3} Q and RR in the segment P_(1)QP_{1} Q. Then RR is inside the closed arc Omega\Omega. Denote now by PP a farthest point from P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3} on Gamma_(6)\Gamma_{6}. Then the tangent line in PP is parallel to P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}. Moving now segment T^(')T^('')T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} continuously and parallel to P_(1)P_(3)P_{1} P_{3}, from P_(1)P_(2)P_{1} P_{2} to PP (see Lemma 1), we may construct with the same procedure as in
the proof of Theorem 1 a triangle TT^(')T^('')T T^{\prime} T^{\prime \prime} with T,T^('),T^('')T, T^{\prime}, T^{\prime \prime} on Gamma_(0)\Gamma_{0} with the sides parallel to the sides of QP_(1)P_(3)Q P_{1} P_{3}. This contradiction proves the theorem.
REIERENCES
[1] Kramer, H. si A. B. Né meth, Aplicarea teovenei de punct fix a lui Brourever in geometria corpuyilor conver Lucrările Colocviului de Geometrie și Topologie, Timişoara 1972.
[2] Kramer H., and A. B. Néneth, Equally spaced points for families of convex and compact sets in the Minkowski spaces. To appear.