The equivalence between Krasnoselskij, Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and multistep iterations

Abstract

Authors

Stefan M. Soltuz
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis , Romanian Academy

Keywords

Krasnoselskij iteration;Β Mann iteration;Β Ishikawa iteration;Β quasi-contractive operators

Paper coordinates

Ş.M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between Krasnoselskij, Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and multistep iterations, Math. Commun. 12 (2007): 1, 53-61.

PDF

About this paper

Journal

Mathematical Communications

Publisher Name

Sveučiliőte Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku Fakultet primijenjene matematike i informatike
Trg Ljudevita Gaja 6, Osijek

Print ISSN

1331-0623

Online ISSN

1848-8013

google scholar link

??

Paper (preprint) in HTML form

The equivalence between Krasnoselskij, Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and multistep iterations

Ştefan M. Şoltuz
Abstract

We prove that Krasnoselskij, Mann, Ishikawa, Noor and multistep iterations are equivalent when applied to quasi-contractive operators.

Key words: Krasnoselskij iteration, Mann iteration, Ishikawa iteration, quasi-contractive operators

AMS subject classifications: 47H10
Received February 21, 2007
Accepted March 12, 2007

1. Introduction

Let XX be a real Banach space, DD a nonempty, convex subset of XX, and TT a selfmap of DD, let x0=u0∈Dx_{0}=u_{0}\in D. The Mann iteration, (see [5]), is defined by

un+1=(1βˆ’Ξ±n)un+Ξ±nTun,u_{n+1}=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)u_{n}+\alpha_{n}Tu_{n}, (1)

where {Ξ±n}βŠ‚(0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\}\subset(0,1). The Krasnoselskij iteration, (see [4]), is defined by

xn+1=(1βˆ’Ξ»)xn+Ξ»Txn,x_{n+1}=(1-\lambda)x_{n}+\lambda Tx_{n}, (2)

where λ∈(0,1)\lambda\in(0,1).
Definition 1. [7] The operator T:X→XT:X\rightarrow X satisfies condition ZZ (or is a quasicontraction) if and only if there exist real numbers a,b,ca,b,c satisfying 0<a<1,0<b,c<1/20<a<1,0<b,c<1/2 such that for each pair x,yx,y in XX, at least one condition is true

  • β€’

    (z1)β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀aβ€–xβˆ’yβ€–\left(z_{1}\right)\|Tx-Ty\|\leq a\|x-y\|,

  • β€’

    (z2)β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀b(β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–+β€–yβˆ’Tyβ€–)\left(z_{2}\right)\|Tx-Ty\|\leq b(\|x-Tx\|+\|y-Ty\|),

  • β€’

    (z3)β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀c(β€–xβˆ’Tyβ€–+β€–yβˆ’Txβ€–)\left(z_{3}\right)\|Tx-Ty\|\leq c(\|x-Ty\|+\|y-Tx\|).

It is known, see Rhoades [8], that (z1),(z2)\left(z_{1}\right),\left(z_{2}\right) and (z3)\left(z_{3}\right) are independent conditions. Note that a map satisfying condition ZZ is independent, see Rhoades [7], of the class of strongly pseudocontractive maps.

00footnotetext: *Institute of Numerical Analysis "T. Popoviciu", P.O. Box 68-1, 400110 Cluj-Napoca, Romania, e-mail: smsoltuz@gmail.com

In [ 9,?9,? ] the following conjecture was given: "if the Mann iteration converges, then so does the Ishikawa iteration". In a series of papers [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], Professor B. E. Rhoades and the author, we have given a positive answer to this Conjecture, showing the equivalence between Mann and Ishikawa iterations for strongly and uniformly pseudocontractive maps.

In [2], the following open question was given: "are Krasnoselskij iteration and Mann iteration equivalent (in the sense of [9]) for enough large classes of mappings?" We shall give a positive answer to this question: if Krasnoselskij iteration converges, then Mann (and the corresponding Ishikawa iteration) also converges and conversely, dealing with maps satisfying condition ZZ. Note that Professor B. E. Rhoades and the author have already given a positive answer in [15] for the class of pseudocontractive maps.

Lemma 1 [[18]]. Let {an}\left\{a_{n}\right\} be a nonnegative sequence which satisfies the following inequality

an+1≀(1βˆ’Ξ»n)an+Οƒn,a_{n+1}\leq\left(1-\lambda_{n}\right)a_{n}+\sigma_{n}, (3)

where Ξ»n∈(0,1),βˆ€nβ‰₯n0,βˆ‘n=1∞λn=∞\lambda_{n}\in(0,1),\forall n\geq n_{0},\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\lambda_{n}=\infty, and Οƒn=o(Ξ»n)\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right). Then limnβ†’βˆžan=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}a_{n}=0.

2. Main results

Let F(T)F(T) denote the fixed point set with respect to DD for the map TT. Suppose that xβˆ—βˆˆF(T)x^{*}\in F(T).

Theorem 1. Let XX be a normed space, DD a nonempty, convex, closed subset of XX and T:Dβ†’DT:D\rightarrow D an operator satisfying condition ZZ. If u0=x0∈Du_{0}=x_{0}\in D, then the following are true: if the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}, then the Krasnoselskij iteration (2) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}. Conversely, if the Krasnoselskij iteration (2) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}, then the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}, provided that Ξ±nβ‰₯A>0,βˆ€nβˆˆβ„•\alpha_{n}\geq A>0,\forall n\in\mathbb{N}.

Proof. Consider x,y∈Dx,y\in D. Since TT satisfies condition ZZ, at least one of the conditions from (z1),(z2)\left(z_{1}\right),\left(z_{2}\right) and (z3)\left(z_{3}\right) is satisfied. If (z2)\left(z_{2}\right) holds, then

β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–\displaystyle\|Tx-Ty\| ≀b(β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–+β€–yβˆ’Tyβ€–)\displaystyle\leq b(\|x-Tx\|+\|y-Ty\|)
≀b(β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–+(β€–yβˆ’xβ€–+β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–+β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–)),\displaystyle\leq b(\|x-Tx\|+(\|y-x\|+\|x-Tx\|+\|Tx-Ty\|)),

thus

(1βˆ’b)β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀bβ€–xβˆ’yβ€–+2bβ€–xβˆ’Txβ€–.(1-b)\|Tx-Ty\|\leq b\|x-y\|+2b\|x-Tx\|.

From 0≀b<10\leq b<1 one obtains,

β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀b1βˆ’bβ€–xβˆ’yβ€–+2b1βˆ’bβ€–xβˆ’Txβ€–.\|Tx-Ty\|\leq\frac{b}{1-b}\|x-y\|+\frac{2b}{1-b}\|x-Tx\|.

If ( z3z_{3} ) holds, then one gets,

β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–\displaystyle\|Tx-Ty\| ≀c(β€–xβˆ’Tyβ€–+β€–yβˆ’Txβ€–)\displaystyle\leq c(\|x-Ty\|+\|y-Tx\|)
≀c(β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–+β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–+β€–xβˆ’yβ€–+β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–),\displaystyle\leq c(\|x-Tx\|+\|Tx-Ty\|+\|x-y\|+\|x-Tx\|),

hence,

(1βˆ’c)β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–\displaystyle(1-c)\|Tx-Ty\| ≀cβ€–xβˆ’yβ€–+2cβ€–xβˆ’Txβ€– i.e.\displaystyle\leq c\|x-y\|+2c\|x-Tx\|\text{ i.e. }
β€–Txβˆ’Tyβ€–\displaystyle\|Tx-Ty\| ≀c1βˆ’cβ€–xβˆ’yβ€–+2c1βˆ’cβ€–xβˆ’Txβ€–\displaystyle\leq\frac{c}{1-c}\|x-y\|+\frac{2c}{1-c}\|x-Tx\|

Denote

Ξ΄:=max⁑{a,b1βˆ’b,c1βˆ’c}\delta:=\max\left\{a,\frac{b}{1-b},\frac{c}{1-c}\right\}

to obtain

0≀δ<10\leq\delta<1

Finally, we get

β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀δ‖xβˆ’yβ€–+2Ξ΄β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–,βˆ€x,y∈D\|Tx-Ty\|\leq\delta\|x-y\|+2\delta\|x-Tx\|,\forall x,y\in D (4)

Formula (4) was obtained as in [1].
We will prove the implication (i)β‡’(ii)(i)\Rightarrow(ii). Use (1) (2) and (4) with

x:=un\displaystyle x=u_{n}
y:=yn\displaystyle y=y_{n}

to obtain

β€–un+1βˆ’xn+1β€–=β€–xn+1βˆ’un+1β€–\displaystyle\left\|u_{n+1}-x_{n+1}\right\|=\left\|x_{n+1}-u_{n+1}\right\|
=β€–xnβˆ’unβˆ’Ξ»xn+Ξ»unβˆ’Ξ»un+Ξ±nun+Ξ»Txnβˆ’Ξ»Tun+Ξ»Tunβˆ’Ξ±nTunβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}-\lambda x_{n}+\lambda u_{n}-\lambda u_{n}+\alpha_{n}u_{n}+\lambda Tx_{n}-\lambda Tu_{n}+\lambda Tu_{n}-\alpha_{n}Tu_{n}\right\|
≀(1βˆ’Ξ»)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–+Ξ»β€–Tunβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq(1-\lambda)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|+\lambda\left\|Tu_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀(1βˆ’Ξ»)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–+λδ‖unβˆ’xnβ€–+2λδ‖unβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq(1-\lambda)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|+\lambda\delta\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+2\lambda\delta\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|
=(1βˆ’Ξ»(1βˆ’Ξ΄))β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+(|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|+2λδ)β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–.\displaystyle=(1-\lambda(1-\delta))\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\left(\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|+2\lambda\delta\right)\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|.

Denote

an\displaystyle a_{n} :=β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|
Ξ»n\displaystyle\lambda_{n} :=Ξ»(1βˆ’Ξ΄)βŠ‚(0,1)\displaystyle=\lambda(1-\delta)\subset(0,1)
Οƒn\displaystyle\sigma_{n} :=(|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|+2λδ)β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle=\left(\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|+2\lambda\delta\right)\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|

Since limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–=0,T\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|=0,T satisfies condition ZZ, and xβˆ—βˆˆF(T)x^{*}\in F(T), from (4) one has

0\displaystyle 0 ≀‖unβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀‖unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xβˆ—βˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x^{*}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀(Ξ΄+1)β€–unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty

Hence limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|=0; that is Οƒn=o(Ξ»n)\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right). Lemma 1 leads to limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’xnβ€–=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|= 0 . Use

0≀‖xβˆ—βˆ’xn‖≀‖unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–0\leq\left\|x^{*}-x_{n}\right\|\leq\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|

to deduce

limnβ†’βˆžxn=xβˆ—.\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}x_{n}=x^{*}.

We will prove (ii)β‡’(i)(ii)\Rightarrow(i). That is, if Krasnoselskij iteration converges, then Mann iteration does converge. Use (4) with

x:=xn,\displaystyle x=x_{n},
y:=un,\displaystyle y=u_{n},

to obtain

β€–xn+1βˆ’un+1β€–\displaystyle\left\|x_{n+1}-u_{n+1}\right\|
=β€–xnβˆ’unβˆ’Ξ±nxn+Ξ±nun+Ξ±nxnβˆ’Ξ»xn+Ξ»Txnβˆ’Ξ±nTxn+Ξ±nTxnβˆ’Ξ±nTunβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}-\alpha_{n}x_{n}+\alpha_{n}u_{n}+\alpha_{n}x_{n}-\lambda x_{n}+\lambda Tx_{n}-\alpha_{n}Tx_{n}+\alpha_{n}Tx_{n}-\alpha_{n}Tu_{n}\right\|
=β€–(1βˆ’Ξ±n)(xnβˆ’un)+(Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»)xnβˆ’(Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»)xnTxn+Ξ±n(Txnβˆ’Tun)β€–\displaystyle=\left\|\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left(x_{n}-u_{n}\right)+\left(\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right)x_{n}-\left(\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right)x_{n}Tx_{n}+\alpha_{n}\left(Tx_{n}-Tu_{n}\right)\right\|
≀(1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|β€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–+Ξ±nβ€–Txnβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\left\|Tx_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀(1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|β€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–+Ξ±nΞ΄β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
=(1βˆ’Ξ±n(1βˆ’Ξ΄))β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+(|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|+2Ξ±nΞ΄)β€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–.\displaystyle=\left(1-\alpha_{n}(1-\delta)\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\left(\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|+2\alpha_{n}\delta\right)\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|.

Denote

an\displaystyle a_{n} :=β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|
Ξ»n\displaystyle\lambda_{n} :=Ξ±n(1βˆ’Ξ΄)βŠ‚(0,1)\displaystyle=\alpha_{n}(1-\delta)\subset(0,1)
Οƒn\displaystyle\sigma_{n} :=(|Ξ±nβˆ’Ξ»|+2Ξ±nΞ΄)β€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle=\left(\left|\alpha_{n}-\lambda\right|+2\alpha_{n}\delta\right)\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|

Since limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–=0,T\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|=0,T satisfies condition ZZ, and xβˆ—βˆˆF(T)x^{*}\in F(T), from (4) one has,

0\displaystyle 0 ≀‖xnβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀‖xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xβˆ—βˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x^{*}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀(Ξ΄+1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž,\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty,

Hence limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|=0, that is Οƒn=o(Ξ»n)\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right). Lemma 1 leads to limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’unβ€–=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|= 0 . Thus,

β€–xβˆ—βˆ’un‖≀‖xnβˆ’unβ€–+β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž.\left\|x^{*}-u_{n}\right\|\leq\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty.

The Ishikawa iteration is defined (see [3]) by

xn+1\displaystyle x_{n+1} =(1βˆ’Ξ±n)xn+Ξ±nTyn,\displaystyle=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)x_{n}+\alpha_{n}Ty_{n}, (5)
yn\displaystyle y_{n} =(1βˆ’Ξ²n)xn+Ξ²nTxn,\displaystyle=\left(1-\beta_{n}\right)x_{n}+\beta_{n}Tx_{n},

where {Ξ±n}βŠ‚(0,1),{Ξ²n}βŠ‚[0,1)\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\}\subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}\right\}\subset[0,1).
The following result is from [17].
Theorem 2 [[17]]. Let XX be a normed space, DD a nonempty, convex, closed subset of XX and T:Dβ†’DT:D\rightarrow D an operator satisfying condition ZZ. If u0=x0∈Du_{0}=x_{0}\in D, then the following are equivalent:
(i) the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*},
(ii) the Ishikawa iteration (5) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.

Theorems 1 and 2 lead to the following corollary.
Corollary 1. Let XX be a normed space, DD a nonempty, convex, closed subset of XX and T:Dβ†’DT:D\rightarrow D an operator satisfying condition ZZ. If u0=x0∈D,Ξ±nβ‰₯A>0,βˆ€nβˆˆβ„•u_{0}=x_{0}\in D,\alpha_{n}\geq A>0,\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, then the following are equivalent:
(i) the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*},
(ii) the Ishikawa iteration (5) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.
(iii) the Krasnoselskij iteration (2) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.

3. Further results

For v1∈Dv_{1}\in D, Noor introduced in [6] the following three-step procedure,

tn\displaystyle t_{n} =(1βˆ’Ξ³n)vn+Ξ³nTvn,\displaystyle=\left(1-\gamma_{n}\right)v_{n}+\gamma_{n}Tv_{n}, (6)
wn\displaystyle w_{n} =(1βˆ’Ξ²n)vn,+Ξ²nTtn,\displaystyle=\left(1-\beta_{n}\right)v_{n},+\beta_{n}Tt_{n},
vn+1\displaystyle v_{n+1} =(1βˆ’Ξ±n)vn+Ξ±nTwn.\displaystyle=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)v_{n}+\alpha_{n}Tw_{n}.

The multi-step procedure of arbitrary fixed order pβ‰₯2p\geq 2, see [14], is defined by

ynpβˆ’1\displaystyle y_{n}^{p-1} =(1βˆ’Ξ²npβˆ’1)xn+Ξ²npβˆ’1Txn,\displaystyle=\left(1-\beta_{n}^{p-1}\right)x_{n}+\beta_{n}^{p-1}Tx_{n}, (7)
yni\displaystyle y_{n}^{i} =(1βˆ’Ξ²ni)xn+Ξ²niTyni+1,i=1,…,pβˆ’2;\displaystyle=\left(1-\beta_{n}^{i}\right)x_{n}+\beta_{n}^{i}Ty_{n}^{i+1},i=1,\ldots,p-2;
xn+1\displaystyle x_{n+1} =(1βˆ’Ξ±n)xn+Ξ±nTyn1,\displaystyle=\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)x_{n}+\alpha_{n}Ty_{n}^{1},

where {Ξ±n}βŠ‚(0,1),{Ξ²ni}βŠ‚[0,1),1≀i≀pβˆ’1\left\{\alpha_{n}\right\}\subset(0,1),\left\{\beta_{n}^{i}\right\}\subset[0,1),1\leq i\leq p-1.
We shall generalize the above Theorem 2, see also [17], by proving that (7) and (1) are equivalent.

Theorem 3. Let XX be a normed space, DD a nonempty, convex, closed subset of XX and T:Dβ†’DT:D\rightarrow D an operator satisfying condition ZZ. If u0=x0∈Du_{0}=x_{0}\in D, then the following are equivalent:
(i) the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*},
(ii) the iteration (7) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.

Proof. We shall use (4) :

β€–Txβˆ’Ty‖≀δ‖xβˆ’yβ€–+2Ξ΄β€–xβˆ’Txβ€–,βˆ€x,y∈D.\|Tx-Ty\|\leq\delta\|x-y\|+2\delta\|x-Tx\|,\forall x,y\in D.

We will prove the implication (i)β‡’(ii)(i)\Rightarrow(ii). Suppose that limnβ†’βˆžun=xβˆ—\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}u_{n}=x^{*}. Using limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’unβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|=0, and 0≀‖xβˆ—βˆ’xn‖≀‖unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–0\leq\left\|x^{*}-x_{n}\right\|\leq\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\| we get

limnβ†’βˆžxn=xβˆ—\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}x_{n}=x^{*}

Using now (1) (7) and (4) with

x:=un,\displaystyle x=u_{n},
y:=yn1,\displaystyle y=y_{n}^{1},

we have

β€–un+1βˆ’xn+1‖≀\displaystyle\left\|u_{n+1}-x_{n+1}\right\|\leq β€–(1βˆ’Ξ±n)(unβˆ’xn)+Ξ±n(Tunβˆ’Tyn1)β€–\displaystyle\left\|\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left(u_{n}-x_{n}\right)+\alpha_{n}\left(Tu_{n}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right)\right\| (8)
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+Ξ±nβ€–Tunβˆ’Tyn1β€–\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\left\|Tu_{n}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+Ξ±nΞ΄β€–unβˆ’yn1β€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|u_{n}-y_{n}^{1}\right\|+
+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–.\displaystyle+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|.

Using (4) with x:=un,y:=yn1x:=u_{n},y:=y_{n}^{1}, we have

β€–unβˆ’yn1‖≀\displaystyle\left\|u_{n}-y_{n}^{1}\right\|\leq β€–(1βˆ’Ξ²n1)(unβˆ’xn)+Ξ²n1(unβˆ’Txn)β€–\displaystyle\left\|\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left(u_{n}-x_{n}\right)+\beta_{n}^{1}\left(u_{n}-Tx_{n}\right)\right\| (9)
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–unβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|u_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ²n1β€–Tunβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Tu_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ²n1Ξ΄β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+2δβn1β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle+\beta_{n}^{1}\delta\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+2\delta\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|
=\displaystyle= (1βˆ’Ξ²n1(1βˆ’Ξ΄))β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}(1-\delta)\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ²n1β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–(1+2Ξ΄).\displaystyle+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|(1+2\delta).

Relations (8) and (9) lead to

β€–un+1βˆ’xn+1‖≀\displaystyle\left\|u_{n+1}-x_{n+1}\right\|\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+ (10)
+Ξ±nΞ΄(1βˆ’Ξ²n1(1βˆ’Ξ΄))β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle+\alpha_{n}\delta\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}(1-\delta)\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ±nΞ²n1Ξ΄β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–(1+2Ξ΄)+\displaystyle+\alpha_{n}\beta_{n}^{1}\delta\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|(1+2\delta)+
+Ξ±nΞ΄β€–unβˆ’ynβ€–\displaystyle+\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|u_{n}-y_{n}\right\|
=\displaystyle= (1βˆ’Ξ±n(1βˆ’Ξ΄(1βˆ’Ξ²n1(1βˆ’Ξ΄))))β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\left(1-\delta\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}(1-\delta)\right)\right)\right)\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ±nΞ΄β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–(Ξ²n1(1+2Ξ΄)+2Ξ΄).\displaystyle+\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|\left(\beta_{n}^{1}(1+2\delta)+2\delta\right).

Denote by

an\displaystyle a_{n} :=β€–unβˆ’xnβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|
Ξ»n\displaystyle\lambda_{n} :=Ξ±n(1βˆ’Ξ΄(1βˆ’Ξ²n1(1βˆ’Ξ΄)))βŠ‚(0,1),\displaystyle=\alpha_{n}\left(1-\delta\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}(1-\delta)\right)\right)\subset(0,1),
Οƒn\displaystyle\sigma_{n} :=Ξ±nΞ΄β€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–(Ξ²n1(1+2Ξ΄)+2Ξ΄).\displaystyle=\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|\left(\beta_{n}^{1}(1+2\delta)+2\delta\right).

Since limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–=0,T\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|=0,T satisfies condition ZZ, and xβˆ—βˆˆF(T)x^{*}\in F(T), from (4) we obtain

0\displaystyle 0 ≀‖unβˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀‖unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xβˆ—βˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x^{*}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀(Ξ΄+1)β€–unβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž.\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left\|u_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty.

Hence limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’Tunβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-Tu_{n}\right\|=0; that is Οƒn=o(Ξ»n)\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right). Lemma 1 leads to limnβ†’βˆžβ€–unβˆ’xnβ€–=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|u_{n}-x_{n}\right\|= 0 .

We will prove now that if multistep iteration converges then Mann iteration does. Using (4) with

x:=yn1,\displaystyle x=y_{n}^{1},
y:=un,\displaystyle y=u_{n},

we obtain

β€–xn+1βˆ’un+1‖≀\displaystyle\left\|x_{n+1}-u_{n+1}\right\|\leq β€–(1βˆ’Ξ±n)(xnβˆ’un)+Ξ±n(Tyn1βˆ’Tun)β€–\displaystyle\left\|\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left(x_{n}-u_{n}\right)+\alpha_{n}\left(Ty_{n}^{1}-Tu_{n}\right)\right\| (11)
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ±nβ€–Tyn1βˆ’Tunβ€–\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\left\|Ty_{n}^{1}-Tu_{n}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ±nΞ΄β€–yn1βˆ’unβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|y_{n}^{1}-u_{n}\right\|+
+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–.\displaystyle+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|.

The following relation holds

β€–yn1βˆ’un‖≀\displaystyle\left\|y_{n}^{1}-u_{n}\right\|\leq β€–(1βˆ’Ξ²n1)(xnβˆ’un)+Ξ²n1(Txnβˆ’un)β€–\displaystyle\left\|\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left(x_{n}-u_{n}\right)+\beta_{n}^{1}\left(Tx_{n}-u_{n}\right)\right\| (12)
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–Txnβˆ’unβ€–\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Tx_{n}-u_{n}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–Txnβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Tx_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+
+Ξ²n1β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–\displaystyle+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–Txnβˆ’xnβ€–.\displaystyle\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Tx_{n}-x_{n}\right\|.

Substituting (12) in (11), we obtain

β€–xn+1βˆ’un+1‖≀\displaystyle\left\|x_{n+1}-u_{n+1}\right\|\leq (1βˆ’Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+ (13)
+Ξ±nΞ΄(β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ²n1β€–Txnβˆ’xnβ€–)+\displaystyle+\alpha_{n}\delta\left(\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Tx_{n}-x_{n}\right\|\right)+
+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–\displaystyle+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|
≀\displaystyle\leq (1βˆ’(1βˆ’Ξ΄)Ξ±n)β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–+Ξ±nΞ²n1Ξ΄β€–Txnβˆ’xnβ€–+\displaystyle\left(1-(1-\delta)\alpha_{n}\right)\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\alpha_{n}\beta_{n}^{1}\delta\left\|Tx_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+
+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–.\displaystyle+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|.

Denote by

an\displaystyle a_{n} :=β€–xnβˆ’unβ€–\displaystyle=\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|
Ξ»n\displaystyle\lambda_{n} :=Ξ±n(1βˆ’Ξ΄)βŠ‚(0,1)\displaystyle=\alpha_{n}(1-\delta)\subset(0,1)
Οƒn\displaystyle\sigma_{n} :=Ξ±nΞ²n1Ξ΄β€–Txnβˆ’xnβ€–+2Ξ±nΞ΄β€–yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–\displaystyle=\alpha_{n}\beta_{n}^{1}\delta\left\|Tx_{n}-x_{n}\right\|+2\alpha_{n}\delta\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|

Since limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–=0,T\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|=0,T satisfies condition ZZ, and xβˆ—βˆˆF(T)x^{*}\in F(T), from (4) we obtain

0\displaystyle 0 ≀‖xnβˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀‖xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xβˆ—βˆ’Txnβ€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x^{*}-Tx_{n}\right\|
≀(Ξ΄+1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty

Note that Ξ²ni∈[0,1),βˆ€nβ‰₯1,1≀i≀pβˆ’1\beta_{n}^{i}\in[0,1),\forall n\geq 1,1\leq i\leq p-1, and use (4) to obtain

0\displaystyle 0 ≀‖yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|
≀‖yn1βˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xβˆ—βˆ’Tyn1β€–\displaystyle\leq\left\|y_{n}^{1}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x^{*}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|
≀(Ξ΄+1)β€–yn1βˆ’xβˆ—β€–β‰€(Ξ΄+1)[(1βˆ’Ξ²n1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ²n1β€–Tyn2βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left\|y_{n}^{1}-x^{*}\right\|\leq(\delta+1)\left[\left(1-\beta_{n}^{1}\right)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{1}\left\|Ty_{n}^{2}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ΄β€–yn2βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\delta\left\|y_{n}^{2}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–yn2βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|y_{n}^{2}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+(1βˆ’Ξ²n2)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ²n2β€–Tyn3βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left(1-\beta_{n}^{2}\right)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{2}\left\|Ty_{n}^{3}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–Tyn3βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|Ty_{n}^{3}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[2β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ΄β€–yn3βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[2\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\delta\left\|y_{n}^{3}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[2β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–yn3βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]…\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[2\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|y_{n}^{3}-x^{*}\right\|\right]\ldots
≀(Ξ΄+1)[(pβˆ’2)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–ynpβˆ’1βˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[(p-2)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|y_{n}^{p-1}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[(pβˆ’2)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+(1βˆ’Ξ²npβˆ’1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ²npβˆ’1β€–Txnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[(p-2)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left(1-\beta_{n}^{p-1}\right)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\beta_{n}^{p-1}\left\|Tx_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[(pβˆ’1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+β€–Txnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[(p-1)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\left\|Tx_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
≀(Ξ΄+1)[(pβˆ’1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–+Ξ΄β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–]\displaystyle\leq(\delta+1)\left[(p-1)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|+\delta\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\right]
=(Ξ΄+1)β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–[(pβˆ’1)+Ξ΄]β†’0 as nβ†’βˆž,\displaystyle=(\delta+1)\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|[(p-1)+\delta]\rightarrow 0\text{ as }n\rightarrow\infty,

Hence limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’Txnβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-Tx_{n}\right\|=0 and limnβ†’βˆžβ€–yn1βˆ’Tyn1β€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|y_{n}^{1}-Ty_{n}^{1}\right\|=0 that is Οƒn=o(Ξ»n)\sigma_{n}=o\left(\lambda_{n}\right). Lemma 1 and (13) lead to limnβ†’βˆžβ€–xnβˆ’unβ€–=0\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|=0. Thus, we get β€–xβˆ—βˆ’un‖≀‖xnβˆ’unβ€–+β€–xnβˆ’xβˆ—β€–β†’0\left\|x^{*}-u_{n}\right\|\leq\left\|x_{n}-u_{n}\right\|+\left\|x_{n}-x^{*}\right\|\rightarrow 0.

Theorem 3 and Corollary 1 lead to the following result.
Corollary 2. Let XX be a normed space, DD a nonempty, convex, closed subset of XX and T:Dβ†’DT:D\rightarrow D an operator satisfying condition ZZ. If the initial point is the same for all iterations, Ξ±nβ‰₯A>0,βˆ€nβˆˆβ„•\alpha_{n}\geq A>0,\forall n\in\mathbb{N}, then the following are equivalent:
(i) the Mann iteration (1) converges to xβˆ—x^{*};
(ii) the Ishikawa iteration (5) converges to xβˆ—x^{*};
(iii) the iteration (7) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.
(iii) the Noor iteration (6) converges to xβˆ—x^{*},
(iv) the Krasnoselskij iteration (2) converges to xβˆ—x^{*}.

Acknowledgment. The author is indebted to referee for carefully reading the paper and for making useful suggestions.

References

[1] V. Berinde, On the convergence of the Ishikawa iteration in the class of quasi contractive operators, Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae LXXIII(2004), 119-126.
[2] V. Berinde, M. Berinde, The fastest Krasnoselskij iteration for approximating fixed points of strictly pseudo-contractive mappings, Carpatian J. Math. 21(2005), 13-20.
[3] S. Ishikawa, Fixed points by a new iteration method, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 44(1974), 147-150.
[4] M. A. KrasnoselskiJ, Two remarks on the method of succesive approximations, Uspehi Mat. Nauk. 10(1955), 123-127.
[5] W. R. Mann, Mean value methods in iteration, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 4(1953), 506-510.
[6] M. A. Noor, New approximation schemes for general variational inequalities, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 251(2000), 217-229.
[7] B. E. Rhoades, Fixed point iterations using infinite matrices, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 196(1974), 161-176.
[8] B. E. Rhoades, A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 226(1977), 257-290.
[9] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, On the equivalence of Mann and Ishikawa iteration methods, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003(2003), 451-459.
[10] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of the Mann and Ishikawa iteration for non-Lipschitzian operators, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 42(2003), 2645-2652.
[11] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between the convergences of Ishikawa and Mann iterations for asymptotically pseudocontractive map, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 283(2003), 681-688.
[12] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of Mann and Ishikawa iteration for a Lipschitzian psi-uniformly pseudocontractive and psi-uniformly accretive maps, Tamkang J. Math., 35(2004), 235-245.
[13] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between the convergences of Ishikawa and Mann iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive in the intermediate sense and strongly successively pseudocontractive maps, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 289(2004), 266-278.
[14] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between Mann-Ishikawa iterations and multistep iteration, Nonlinear Analysis 58(2004), 219-228.
[15] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between the Krasnoselskij, Mann and Ishikawa iterations, Revue d’analyse numerique et de theorie de l’approximation πŸ‘πŸ”(2006)\mathbf{36}(2006), to appear.
[16] B. E. Rhoades, Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence between the TT-stabilities of Mann and Ishikawa iterations J. Math. Anal. Appl. 318(2006), 472-475.
[17] Ş. M. Şoltuz, The equivalence of Picard, Mann and Ishikawa iterations dealing with quasi-contractive operators, Math. Comm. 10(2005), 81-89.
[18] X. Weng, Fixed point iteration for local strictly pseudocontractive mapping, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 113(1991), 727-731.

2007

Related Posts