Abstract
Authors
Radu Precup
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science and Institute of Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, Babes-Bolyai, University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis, Romanian Academy, Romania
Andrei Stan
Tiberiu Popoviciu Institute of Numerical Analysis, Romanian Academy, Romania
Department of Mathematics, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Wei-Shih Du
Department of Mathematics, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung 824004, Taiwan.
Keywords
control problem; moving singularity; differential equation; lower and upper solutions; bisection algorithm; fractional differential equation; numerical simulation
Paper coordinates
R. Precup, A. Stan, W.-S. Du, Control of Semilinear Differential Equations with Moving Singularities, Fractal and Fractional, 9 (2025) no. 4, art. no. 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract9040198
About this paper
Journal
Fractal and Fractional
Publisher Name
MDPI
Print ISSN
Online ISSN
google scholar link
References
[1] Torres, P.J. Mathematical Models with Singularities: A Zoo of Singular Creatures; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015. [Google Scholar]
[2] O’Regan, D. Theory of Singular Boundary Value Problems; World Scientific Publishing: River Edge, NJ, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
[3] Callegari, A.; Nachman, A. A nonlinear singular boundary value problem in the theory of pseudoplasitc fluids. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1980, 38, 275–282. [Google Scholar]
[4] Gingold, H. Rosenblat, S. Differential equations with moving singularities. SIAM J. Math. Anal 1976, 7, 942–957. [Google Scholar]
[5] Gingold, H. Introduction to differential equations with moving singularities. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1976, 6, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[6] Fila, M.; Takahashi, J.; Yanagida, E. Solutions with moving singularities for a one-dimensional nonlinear diffusion equation. Math. Ann. 2024, 390, 5383–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[7] Nicolescu, M.; Dinculeanu, N.; Marcus, S. Manual de Analiză Matematicăa (II); Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică: Bucureşti, Romania, 1964. (In Romanian) [Google Scholar]
[8] Haplea, I.Ş.; Parajdi, L.G.; Precup, R. On the controllability of a system modeling cell dynamics related to leukemia. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[9] Precup, R. On some applications of the controllability principle for fixed point equations. Results Appl. Math. 2022, 13, 100236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[10] Coron, J.M. Control and Nonlinearity; AMS: Providence, RI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
[11] Coddington, E.A. An Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]
[12] Precup, R. Ordinary Differential Equations; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
[13] O’Regan, D.; Precup, R. Theorems of Leray-Schauder Type and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
[14] Ciarlet, G. Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
[15] Le Dret, H. Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
[16] Gronwall, T.H. Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations. Ann. Math. 1919, 20, 292–296. [Google Scholar]
[17] Pachpatte, B.G.; Ames, W.F. Inequalities for Differential and Integral Equations; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
[18] Rudin, W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis; MacGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
[19] Parajdi, L.G.; Precup, R.; Haplea, I.S. A method of lower and upper solutions for control problems and application to a model of bone marrow transplantation. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 2023, 33, 409–418. [Google Scholar]
[20] Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
[21] Kilbas, A.A.; Trujillo, J.J. Differentiale equations of fractional order: Methods, results and problems-I. Appl. Anal. 2001, 78, 153–192. [Google Scholar]
[22] Benchohra, M.; Hamani, S.; Ntouyas, S.K. Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional order and nonlocal conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71, 2391–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
[23] Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Mathematics in Sciences and Engineering; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; Volume 198. [Google Scholar]
Paper (preprint) in HTML form
Control of semilinear differential equations with moving singularities
Abstract.
In this paper, we present a control problem related to a semilinear differential equation with a moving singularity, i.e., the singular point depends on a parameter. The particularity of the controllability condition resides in the fact that it depends on the singular point which in turn depends on the control variable. We provide sufficient conditions to ensure that the functional determining the control is continuous over the entire domain of the parameter. Lower and upper solutions technique combined with a bisection algorithm is used to prove the controllability of the equation and to approximate the control. An example is given together with some numerical simulations. The results naturally extend to fractional differential equations.
1. Introduction and preliminaries
Differential equations are crucial in solving practical problems in many scientific fields, such as physics, chemistry, biology, economics, and engineering, etc., modeling many real-world processes. However, the complexity of these phenomena often introduces various parameters that can significantly influence the outcome. A particularly intriguing problem in this context is identifying the parameters that ensure a specific quantity (e.g., density, energy) related to the solution of the differential equation reaches a desired value. This challenge naturally leads to a control problem.
Our study has two strong motivations.
- (a):
-
The first motivation concerns differential equations with moving singularities, which frequently appear in nonlinear models from applied sciences, such as physics and mathematical biology [1].
- (b):
-
The second one relates to the control of such models, aiming to reach a desired state of the process. For example, if the state variable represents a density, one might be interested in controlling its cumulative value or average. This corresponds precisely to our control problem in Section 2.
Mathematical models expressed through equations with singularities include the Briot-Bouquet equation, which has applications in complex analysis, specifically in the theory of univalent functions; equations arising in Michaelis-Menten kinetics, modeling oxygen diffusion in cells; the Thomas-Fermi equation in atomic physics; and the Emden-Fowler equation, in the study of phenomena in non-Newtonian fluid mechanics [1, 2, 3].
Inspired by the investigation in [4, 5, 6], this paper will explore the following problem
(1.1) |
Here, is a function that possesses a singularity in the first variable, influenced by the third one, that is, for each , there exists such that
Throughout this paper, we use to denote the unique solution to problem (1.1) for a given . Since the singularity point varies with , the differential equation (1.1) is said to be with moving singularity.
For each , we consider the functional ,
(1.2) |
where the integration over the noncompact interval is understood in the usual sense (see, e.g., [7]),
Our goal in this paper is the following control problem:
Problem (control problem).
Find such that
(1.3) |
where is a given value.
The particularity of the controllability condition resides in the fact that it depends on the singular point which in turn depends on the control variable. To establish sufficient conditions for the existence of a solution to this control problem, we first guarantee that the mapping ,
(1.4) |
is well-defined and continuous on . Then, we are able to use a lower and upper solution argument to guarantee the existence of a with the desired property (1.3). Moreover, by bisection algorithm, we have a method of approximation of the value
Control problems on a fixed interval that require to find a parameter in order to achieve a specific controllability condition are well-documented in the literature (see, e.g., [8, 9, 10]). The novelty of this paper lies in determining such a parameter where each solution is defined on a different interval. This approach requires a more refined analysis and leads to more complex problems.
The main assumptions we use in our analysis are
-
(h1)
For each and , there exists a constant such that for all and for all , we have
-
(h2)
The mappings
are continuous. Additionally, the map is continuous for , , and .
In the next lemma, we show that assumptions (h1), (h2) are sufficient to guarantee the existence of a unique solution of problem (1.1).
Lemma 1.1.
Under assumptions (h1) and (h2), for each , there exists a unique solution of problem (1.1. Moreover, this solution satisfies the integral equation
(1.5) |
for all
Proof.
Let . For each , we consider the initial value problem on the cut-off domain,
(1.6) |
From assumption (h1), the mapping is Lipschitz continuous with the Lipschitz constant . Therefore, problem (1.6) has a unique solution (see, e.g., [12, 11]). The conclusion follows immediately by letting and using the uniqueness of the solution on each interval . Relation (1.5) can be easily deduced by taking the integral in (1.1) from to ∎
Example A.
The model for is given by
Clearly, there is a singularity at . However, when the first variable is restricted to a compact interval with , the function is Lipschitz continuous with the Lipschitz constant. If we set , the unique solution of the problem (1.1) is
Remark 1.1.
Without imposing further assumptions beyond (h1) and (h2), we cannot generally expect to be well-defined and continuous on . For instance, consider the case where
Clearly, both assumptions (h1) and (h2) are satisfied. Straightforward calculations yield
for each . Consequently,
This implies that for , but
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the original results on the controllability of equations with moving singularities. Before establishing the main result (Theorem 2.6), we derive several auxiliary results concerning the continuous dependence of solutions on the control parameter and the continuity of the control functional with respect to the control variable. In Section 3, we provide a theoretical algorithm for obtaining the solution of the control problem using the method of lower and upper solutions. We also provide an example that illustrates the applicability of the obtained results. Finally, in Section 4 we suggest a possible extension of our approach to fractional differential equations with moving singularities.
In the following, we present some well-known results from the literature that will be used throughout this paper. The first result is the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem (see, e.g., [13, 14]).
Theorem 1.2 (Arzelà-Ascoli theorem).
A subset , where is the supremum norm, is relatively compact if and only if it is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous, that is, there exists with
and for every , there exists such that
The next lemma provides an alternative condition to ensure the convergence of a sequence based on the behavior of its subsequences (see, e.g., [15, Lemma 1.1]).
Theorem 1.3.
Let be a topological space, and let be a sequence in with the following property: there exists such that from any subsequence of , a further subsequence can be extracted that converges to . Then the entire sequence converges to .
Theorem 1.4 (Grönwall inequality).
Let . If there exists a constant such that
then
3. Approximate solving of the control problem
Starting from the lower and upper solutions one can approximate by using the following algorithm. For a similar use of this method, we refer the reader to [19].
Algorithm (Bisection algorithm).
Step 0 (initialization): .
Step compute
-
If then and we are finished;
-
If then set and and repeat Step with
-
If then set and and repeat Step with
Stop criterion: if then (with error ).
We note that this step-by-step algorithm iteratively approximates the control solution. At each step, based on the obtained feedback, either the subsolution or the supersolution is improved.
Theorem 3.1.
Under assumptions (h1)-(h3), the bisection algorithm is convergent to a solution of the control problem.
Proof.
If the algorithm does not stop after a finite number of steps, then it generates two bounded and monotone (so convergent) sequences and which in addition satisfy
(3.1) |
(3.2) |
From (3.1), the two sequences have the same limit denoted while from (3.2), in virtue of the continuity Theorem 2.5, we obtain
Hence as desired. ∎
Example B.
A typical example of function satisfying conditions (h1)-(h3) is
(3.3) |
where . Clearly, . If in addition we take , we obtain the unique solution of problem (1.1),
Therefore,
which is well-defined and continuous on .

We conclude this example with some numerical simulations for the function defined in (3.3), with . Our aim is to determine such that . The exact value is known to be . For the lower and upper solutions of the control problem, we take and , respectively, while the tolerance is chosen to be .
In the Figure 1, the blue curve represents the error between and , where at each step is while the orange curve represents the difference between the calculated value of and the exact value . After 18 iterations, the approximate value of the control is found to be
In Figure 2, the graph of is plotted for the last three values of obtained from the bisection algorithm (those corresponding to the lowest error in the previous figure). We see that for , the graph of the function almost overlaps with the graph of .

Remark 3.1.
The conclusion of Theorem 2.5 clearly remains valid under assumptions (h1)-(h3), if instead of the functionals we consider the functionals
and instead of we correspondingly take
Moreover, we can extend this result to type functionals of the form
where . In this case, if we replace (h3) by condition
-
(h3’)
There exists a constant such that, for all , one has
for all and all , where and the map is continuous.
4. Extension to fractional differential equations
The above results can be generalized to fractional differential equations with moving singularities. Such problems more accurately describe various physical, biological, or medical processes (see, e.g., [20, 21, 22, 23]). Therefore, our results related to problem (1.1) can be extended to the following problem:
where is the Caputo fractional derivative and . As shown in the literature, the above problem is equivalent to the Voltera integral equation
Note that, in our case, the control problem remain unchanged, i.e., find such that
Since our entire analysis is grounded in the integral form of the Cauchy problem, we can easily extend the proof steps to address this more general case. The flexibility of the integral formulation allows for the adaptation of our methods without significant modifications. By imposing conditions similar to those outlined in (h1) and (h2), we can rigorously establish the controllability of the problem.
5. Conclusions
The analyzed control problem in this paper is atypical in several aspects: (a) it refers to equations with singularity; (b) the singularity itself depends on the control variable; (c) the controllability condition involves the moving singularity. All these aspects make the analysis much more complex and adapted to the specifics of the problem. The working techniques can also be taken into account for the investigation of other types of singular equations and controllability conditions including singular partial differential equations (see, e.g., [6]). We believe and anticipate that the ideas and techniques used in this article will have the high degree of suitability for the specifics of each individual problem in future research.
References
- [1] Torres, P.J. Mathematical Models with Singularities: A Zoo of Singular Creatures; Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, 2015.
- [2] O’Regan, D. Theory of Singular Boundary Value Problems; World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ,. USA, 1994.
- [3] Callegari, A; Nachman, A. A nonlinear singular boundary value problem in the theory of pseudoplasitc fluids. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 1980, 38, 275–282.
- [4] Gingold, H. Rosenblat, S. Differential equations with moving singularities. SIAM J. Math. Anal 1976, 7(6), 942–957.
- [5] Gingold, H. Introduction to differential equations with moving singularities. Rocky Mountain J. Math. 1976, 6(4), 571–574.
- [6] Fila, M; Takahashi, J; Yanagida, E. Solutions with moving singularities for a one-dimensional nonlinear diffusion equation. Math. Ann. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-024-02882-0.
- [7] Nicolescu, M; Dinculeanu, N; Marcus, S. Manual de analiză matematicăa (II); Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică: Bucureşti, Romania, 1964. (In Romanian)
- [8] Haplea, I.Ş; Parajdi, L.G; Precup, R. On the controllability of a system modeling cell dynamics related to leukemia. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1867.
- [9] Precup, R. On some applications of the controllability principle for fixed point equations. Results Appl. Math. 2022, 13, 100236.
- [10] Coron, J.M. Control and Nonlinearity; AMS: Providence, 2007.
- [11] Coddington, E.A. An Introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations; Dover: New York, 1961.
- [12] Precup, R. Ordinary Differential Equations; De Gruyter: Berlin, 2018.
- [13] O’Regan, D; Precup, R. Theorems of Leray-Schauder Type and Applications; CRC Press, 2002.
- [14] Ciarlet, G. Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications; SIAM: Philadelphia, 2013.
- [15] Le Dret, H. Nonlinear Elliptic Partial Differential Equations; Springer: Berlin, 2018.
- [16] Gronwall, T.H. Note on the derivatives with respect to a parameter of the solutions of a system of differential equations. Ann. Math. 1919, 20(4), 292–296.
- [17] Pachpatte, B.G.; Ames, W.F. Inequalities for Differential and Integral Equations; Academic Press, 1997.
- [18] Rudin, W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis; MacGraw-Hill, 1976.
- [19] Parajdi, L.G; Precup, R; Haplea, I.S. A method of lower and upper solutions for control problems and application to a model of bone marrow transplantation. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 2023, 33(3), 409 - 418.
- [20] Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives: Theory and Applications; Gordon and Breach Science Publishers: Yverdon, 1993.
- [21] Kilbas, A.A.; Trujillo, J.J. Differentiale equations of fractional order: methods, results and problems-I. Appl. Anal. 2001, 78, 153–192.
- [22] Benchohra, M.; Hamani, S.; Ntouyas, S.K. Boundary value problems for differential equations with fractional order and nonlocal conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71(7-8), 2391–2396.
- [23] Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Mathematics in Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 198; Academic Press: San Diego, 1999.